HIENVN

Thanks C1ay, Although this Einstein's equation is 101 years old, but it is still new to me!

Thanks you for your attention to my thread. I am looking for my documents to answer somebody in Science Forums, which an answer to your is my main point. Because my English skill is no good and my experience in Science Forums is lack when compare with all members in these Forums, I have spent a long time to learn English and experience of all members in these forums before I write my thread. I currently focus on your post “Explain Mass,” with inertia is a main point for some my new threads, will coming soon in Science Forum. I wish you would help me to clear about this inertia that you have a right question and you may have a right answer. I have viewed your Public Profile with all your post and I am surprised about your knowledge of science. I would to learn all your post to feedback for all my thread or post in the future. All the best, HIENVN

You may absolutely believe on "The Final Theory," which this theory can't fail by definition! Please comeback to the scientific purpose of Science Forums, in which we can talk about science better than just believe on a name of a theory. You can know a lot of "The Final Theory," and then I have a request to you, "Please tell me, how many theories are using in The Final Theory?"

I think Li Zifeng is right, "Math can't properly represent for physics in some case," I will explain to you, if you would like to read what I will write.

You have right in my concept. May you explain to me about mass conservation? Because I just know energy conservation. I would like to exchange idea with you (and somebody) in this forum. I have to go my work right now, see you later.

Hi, Coldcreation and everybody in this forum of the unified field theory. I am a new member of Hypography and I would like to engage in this discussion that the unified field theory should be a advance theory of the 21st century. Almost scientists not only know Einstein as is the author of unified field theory, but they also know Einstein rejected the value of quantum theory since 1920, which is a year that he proposed unified field theory. Although I have found out some defeats of quantum theory, but I did not strongly reject quantum theory such as Einstein did. However, when we play a game we must to obey the rules of this game; therefore, we must to obey the rule of Einstein is reject the value of quantum theory if we want to discuss his unified field theory. Carlitto display a unified field theory in a manner of quantum theory when he using four quantum force numbers that do not in the idea of Einstein in his proposed unified field theory. I would like to have a question to every body in this forum, which: "Could somebody or me display a unified field theory that not include any quantum theory?" I am waiting opinions of everybody in this forum. Thanks to everyone, HIENVN

All scientists are known Einstein’s equation and they can explain this equation in many ways that they like. With me, this energy E shows amount exclusive energy of matter M, in event this matter is not disappeared.

The practice is never stopping while the universe exists, but mystery will be stopped if scientists find out a single secret of phenomena. You should consult some theories about secret of phenomena, such as Unified Field Theory (UFT), Theory of Everything (TOE) and The Final Theory (TFT) to have an estimate of this secret.

General Relativity Theory will fail if nobody improves it. In a statement at Sweden, 1923, Einstein confirmed some disadvantage of his relativity theory and he wished to improve it by relating this theory to electromagnetism and gravitation.

I voted physics because physics is still having some mysteries that attracted me, and because I like Albert Einstein who is the great physician too.

In my opinion, Einstein was right when he said he was wrong. However, almost scientists would like to say Einstein was wrong when he said he was wrong! These scientists are base on what they observed in their laboratories and in the universe. Einstein is not only said he was wrong but he also spent a long time (1920 -1945) to study for a theory that he named “Unified Field Theory,” which he hope will prove a wrong of quantum theory and a lack of his relativity theory. However, Einstein could not establish this unified field theory and this was a proof that almost scientists said Einstein was wrong when he rejected the value of quantum theory and his own relativity theory. Einstein knew he is wrong in his last life, because he supported for quantum theory and relativity theory that some of their defeats may cause some great mistakes for the future scientists. -Quantum Theory: Einstein supported for this theory with his study for photon (Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921), but he rejected the value of this quantum theory, because this theory expresses the non-continuousness of the universe while he mind universe is continuous. In my opinion, quantum mechanics used the exclusive term “Quanta” to describe the energy emit from a heat object. This description is not enough to describe all the interaction of the universe. -Relativity Theory: Einstein established this theory (in 1905 and 1915), but he said this theory is lack in his lecture in 1923, when he came to Sweden to receive for his 1921’s Nobel Prize for Physics. In my opinion, this relativity theory is lack because it is not include “energy” that is an important element of the universe. A great mistake is scientists around the world still use relativity theory to study for gravitational waves, which are the waves that Einstein confirmed in a manner of his general relativity theory in 1915.

Gravitational waves are a subject that scientists around the world currently pay attention to these waves, which also is my consideration for a long time. Einstein really deal with gravitational waves in his general relativity theory in 1915 (or 1916?) that recent scientists are trying to discover these waves in a prediction that they call “the prediction of gravitational waves in 1916’s Einstein general relativity theory,” with a lot of gravitation group such as LISA [Home Page] http://lisa.jpl.nasa.gov/ , which stands for The Light Interferometer Space Antenna, the Light Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory LIGO [Home Page] http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/, etc… In my study to Einstein’s life and work, the prediction of Einstein in 1916 maybe wrong, because the general relativity theory has some defeats that Einstein confirmed in 1923, when he come to Sweden to receive the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921. This award was not recognized his famous relativity theory. In my opinion, the discovery of gravitational waves should be progressed if scientists around the world study these waves in a direction of unified field theory that Einstein introduced in 1920.

In Einstein’s opinion, the space is not in quanta! The space should be in continuoussness. “Quanta” disclosed a lack of quantum mechanics to the universe that Einstein disclaimed this “quanta”; because this “quanta” shows an interruption of interaction in the universe that Einstein cannot think so. The interaction of the universe must be continuous in order to obey a single law of universe that Einstein proposed in his last life. Quantum theory may be accepted in the scope of atoms and this theory will false in the scope of universe

In the science, math just is a tool to describe phenomena, which these phenomena was confirmed by scientists who found out the rule or law of these phenomena by their observations in their experiments or in the nature. An excessive application of math will bypass some important phenomena, and sometime this use will cause a great loss for scientists who use this math. Albert Einstein spent almost 25 years for his proposed unified field theory and he failed in this theory. Because he used math to looking for a single secret of phenomena that he believed this secret exist in the universe!

“The Final Theory” should be Einstein’s unified field theory, because Einstein proposed a single secret of phenomena that he could not establish in his last life. If a single secret of phenomena is introduced to the scientists, then the scientists may base on this single secret to solve the whole universe.

When I write something in the Science Forums, I have readied some proof for what I wrote. I am preparing my first new thread on this Science Forums to answer somebody about Einstein’s idea that I just begging to understand it. I would like to invite you visit my new post that will come soon on this Forums; my first post will have a title “Einstein and a Single Secret of Phenomena,” that has a relation to the work of your Einstein@home. Thanks you for your regard of my thread to the post of “The Final Theory.”

“The Final Theory” should be Einstein’s unified field theory, because Einstein proposed a single secret of phenomena that he could not establish in his last life. If a single secret of phenomena is introduced to the scientists, then scientists may base on this single secret to solve the whole universe.

Gravitational waves may move faster or slower than light; or these waves may move equal to light. Because nobody knows about gravitational waves, which are not discover yet, then I think your question is so far to have a right answer.

Yes, it's a crazy world! According to Dr. Daniel Greenberger, “Einstein said that if quantum mechanics is right, then the world is crazy. Well, Einstein was right. The world is crazy.”

You may in the way of a Unified Theory of two scientists ( one is an American and one is an Pakistan) that received an Award of Nobel Prize for Physics about 30 years ago. This Unified Theory is still far to the Einstein's Unified Field Theory, because Unified Theory just limit in an atom while Unified Field Theory go to the universe. However, We can disscuss together for your model and I wish that will learn form your experience. Because my Enlish skill is not good, my response to you will be very slow.

In general, the Law of Conservation of Energy is right. However, what recent scientists mind the meaning of "Energy!" As an amateur scientist that just begin to study for Einstein's Unified Field Theory since 2005, I would like to tell that the universe has two types of energy are "external energy" and "internal energy." The Law of Conservation of Energy just right when this Law is applied for each type of above mentioned energy. In my study, "internal energy" and "external energy" has a curved relationship that scientist may use this relationship to take out energy from the universe to serve for human life.

Hi, Tormod I think you should not hungry with Josephine about some meaning of relativity theory. I confirm with you that relativity theory is a lack theory that Einstein anounced in 1923. If you want to know more about Einstein's idea for his relativity theory, please contact me at email address hidsaxe@msn.com Thank you Hien Nguyen

In 1921, Einstein rejected the value of quantum theory. He rejected his own relativity theory in his famous lecture at Stockholm-Sweden in 1923, when he received the Nobel Prize for Physics that the Royal Science Academy of Sweden gave to him in 1921 that not for his relativity theory. In 1923, Einstein confirmed the inadequacy of his relativity theory and proposed a better theory, which he called the unified field theory. I know you have spent a long time to study for relativity theory. But I think you will sucessful if you study for Einstein's unified field theory. You can exchange email with me hidsaxe@msn.com, I am studying for unified fied theory (since 2005) and we can successful in this theory.

The Universe as a Living Entity because all matters of the universe always exchange energy together by the means of gravitational waves. This is a living picture such as people need energy (food..) to exist. If have a day all matter in the universe don't exchange their energy, we will have a "death universe." This is a single secrect of universe that human must to know.

You have mistake from a condition of "Far away from meddling influence of gravity." The universe is covered by gravitational waves, which are the cause of gravitational waves; therefore, your experiment can not happen.