Jump to content
Science Forums

Cmb And The Construction Of Galaxies Using Unruh Effect And Hawking Raditation


Recommended Posts

OK, I added the section back into the theory about charge quantization using charge with something like the Stefan-Boltzmann law. Which explains that the charge of the photon may add up to a greater energy than the Planck energy.

 

The reason I did that is that it explains the nucleon mass and the charge of the electron. It uses mechanical advantage principles to explain the differences in energies of charge and mass. I also indicated that we might not be dealing with Unruh temperature comparisons as much as a black hole entropy defined by Stephen Hawking.

 

I didn't remove anything, I just added some supplemental equations. Some things I need to work out in the theory is how the Unruh temperature relates to black hole entropy instead. Also I need to work out the mechanical advantage concepts and derive both. So please be advised it is a little unfinished.

Edited by devin553344
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Its seems to me that the much vaunted Casimir Effect may a lot of fuss about nothing. It appears to be well predicted by relativistically corrected van der Waals forces between the plates, i.e. nothin

What do you mean by "anyone else"?

I have constructed a theory that may be interesting to some readers. The units all check out and the values equation to within .1%.   The theory basically states that Einstein left some unfinished wor

LOL

 

This thread is a load of BS, but funny!

Yeah, isn't it? Bad enough for a person to blither on about the Unruh effect when they don't know Newton's Shell Theorem, or why the CMBR is universal. But shovelling in an equation for the current in a diode, in the middle of a "paper" about cosmology, takes us to a whole new level of surreality - knocks Dubbelsox into a cocked hat.  :winknudge:

 

Still, as so often, I learn from some of these madhouse threads. Now I know what the Unruh Effect is and why it is so tiny as to be negligible for most purposes (with a freebie in the form of the Shockley Diode equation, though I don't think I'll remember that one as electronics is not my scene).  

 

Time for Flummoxed to put on his biological protection suit and delve into the pit again, for more nuggets?  

Edited by exchemist
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its the Unruh Hawking effect, they both discovered it, didnt they? :) Black body radiation. 

No I don't think so. Seems it is also known as the Fulling Davies Unruh effect. But not Hawking, so far as I can see. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect

 

I'm intrigued as to how they propose to measure it experimentally. The article speaks of accelerations of the order of 10²⁶ m/sec². 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No I don't think so. Seems it is also known as the Fulling Davies Unruh effect. But not Hawking, so far as I can see. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect

 

I'm intrigued as to how they propose to measure it experimentally. The article speaks of accelerations of the order of 10²⁶ m/sec². 

 

Well, that’s just slow as molasses compared to Planck acceleration: 5.67 x 10^50 g

 

I’m more intrigued to learn how the electron makes use of mechanical advantage. Gears? levers? what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that’s just slow as molasses compared to Planck acceleration: 5.67 x 10^50 g

 

I’m more intrigued to learn how the electron makes use of mechanical advantage. Gears? levers? what?

 

Mostly the mechanical advantage is Planck length squared for the black hole instead of Unruh temp energy, which relates to entropy. I'm still examining that. But I can calculate the mass and electric field of the electron, proton and neutron. But yes I'm still working out ideas to derive the theory correctly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that’s just slow as molasses compared to Planck acceleration: 5.67 x 10^50 g

 

I’m more intrigued to learn how the electron makes use of mechanical advantage. Gears? levers? what?

These Planck times, distances and accelerations are not physical things though. They are just theoretical extremes, beyond which current models cease to define the quantities concerned. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...