Jump to content
Science Forums

devin553344

Members
  • Content Count

    538
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

devin553344 last won the day on July 5 2019

devin553344 had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About devin553344

  • Rank
    Explaining

Recent Profile Visitors

563 profile views
  1. I have finished my theory and made a complete outline of all the basic stable particles including the neutron. It maps the forces as a wave force and reverse amperage.
  2. There is a slight typo in this file, the electron gravitational degrees of freedom is 9, where the proton is 12. Also the neutron can be described with this theory also, using charge radius of 1.00559957187091E-15 meters and 10 degrees of freedom. Here's the corrected file:
  3. I have been working on the magnetic moment equation to unify that with the charge and charge radius of the stable particles (electron and proton). I have finished it. This theory unifies, matter, electric charge, magnetic moment, gravitation. It does this via the wave-diode equality using the Shockley diode equation, it also uses the Peltier effect of reverse thermal flow. Here is the file: 20201001 Wave-Diode Theory.pdf
  4. I had some problems with the theory since electrons have no apparent charge radius, I found the charge radius of the electron is the electron wavelength. I worked out the equations to support the measured charge radius of the proton and the wavelength of the electron. This is a wave-diode equivalence theory. It states that waves behave like diodes with p-n junctions which provides an electric charge as a reverse biased amperage. The Shockley diode equation is used to describe the different forces. There is also a reverse amperage heat conducted in reverse of the electric charge via the Pe
  5. Andrew, it would appear that in order to understand electric force, you must first understand how it works. Electric force is a function of electric charge. Without electric charge force does not exist. In fact without an imbalance in charge, there is no force to even consider. Which is why I cannot consider your idea. Not to mention the fact that the electric escape energy (force) is subtracted or added to the mass of the parts of the electrons and protons. Which is why there is no additional energy floating around either. So there's no force for your idea. Calculations? Look at hydrogen
  6. I think you're missing the point, how is it that the sun, planets, moons all attract, but none repel, so your idea is that there is some charge to the sun, planets and moons. Have you worked out any math or calculations? Probably not cause then you would see that your idea is invalid.
  7. I have some new equations, I have been examining the math and looking to see if the math will support my idea. Basically a wave is also a diode. Therefore the wave-particle duality should support diode physics and work with the Shockley diode equation. What I found is this: Charge radius: rc = 4r/(2pi) Where rc is the charge radius of the particle (for the proton it's 8.412E-16 meters), r is the wavelength of the particle. Electric charge: Ke^2/rc^4 = hc/r^4 * exp(-(hc)/(kb)) Where K is the electric constant, e is the elementary charge, h is the Planck constant, c
  8. I am proposing a Peltier effect for the gravitation, I will model only the proton, but basically a heat is conducted by the reverse bias amperage of the diode which goes into the Shockley diode equation to calculate a secondary reverse bias amperage for gravitation: Again the Proton gravitation is: Gm^2/r^5 = hc/r^5 * exp(-hc/(Ke^2) * rC^5/r^5) Where G is the gravitational constant, m is the proton mass, r is the wavelength of the proton, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, K is the electric constant, e is the elementary charge, rC is the charge radius of the proton
  9. I'm working on a better solution using the same idea and have concluded that the temperature relates to the Boltzmann constant and the Wien displacement constant: Ke^2/rC^5 = hc/r^5 * exp(-9/2*hc/(hc)) Where K is the electric constant, e is the elementary charge, rC is the charge radius of the particle, h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, r is the wavelength of the particle.
  10. I've updated the PDF in the OP with the new magnetic moment calculations. I've been working on them for about a week. I found that they might relate to charge radii of the electron, proton and neutron and have 2 degrees of freedom instead of 3 or 4.
  11. I have been studying theory for about 5 years now and concluded that charge may be a hill of pressure (space-time) and matter a valley of pressure. Both exist in a wave form with positive and negative components created a diode-like p-n junction. And if that is the case then perhaps the Shockley diode equation can be used to describe the reverse-bias amperages that are involved in such hills and valleys. I found that the electron represents 3 degrees of freedom while the proton appears to represent 4 degrees of freedom. The 5 equations that describe matter, electromagnetic, strong force and gr
  12. I have finished a new idea that appears to unify all of the force except the weak nuclear force (I need to research that more to understand it). Here is the PDF file:
  13. I'm adjusting the electron to be basically a 5 dimensional n-sphere (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N-sphere): hc/(8/3 * π^2 * (re + re)^5) = Ke^2/re^5 Where h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, re is the electron wavelength, K is the electric constant, e is the elementary charge. It's close but slightly off, and it allows the two times the wavelength to be compressed down to the wavelength, created a charge pressure of the wavelength size and a vacuum of mass of the wavelength. The amount it is off appears to relate to an angular kinetic energy similar to the slight off of th
  14. I've updated the pressure-vacuum balance equations for the electron particle and proton particle. The correction is in the pdf file in the OP in post #1.
×
×
  • Create New...