Because it's the truth.
I've seen your posts, its full of crap, then you bit-ch and whine that no one ''will dispute your claims, or falsify them'' but what gives you such a massive ego that people should? If I saw a genuine post, with more than an ounce of intellect behind it, I would almost certainly participate. But you are like a broken record, you cry for attention, but when people have given you the attention, you constantly repeat false claims. This is not an incentive for anyone to bother with you.
Now - I have had enough of these swings and roundabouts, you need to show some humility that your knowledge of physics is seriously lacking. One last statement from me, how many times have people said to you, that you wish to appear more intelligent than the greatest scientists alive? - because this is a statement I have only used once on this forum to explain the psychology behind the crank. Perhaps do yourself a favor, stop deluding yourself and go through the hard process everyone else has to do to truly understand the complexities behind the theories of Einstein which you so insidiously ignore.
You never gave Einsteins Special Relativity a seconds thought, you just learned the math parrot fashion. Without stopping to consider if its the work of a sane person or not.
I read up to the first postulate and realised that it's impossible to continue reading any further, and a major error had already been introduced into the hypothesis.
I asked Einstein to fix his half-truth error of the first postulate, but he never replied. The hypothesis must be dead for him.
Of course, I did actually read the rest of the paper but had the same problem with Postulate number two.
Now, how easy should it be for you to explain why the postulates are in fact, sound rational claims, contrasting my statements that they are half-truths, which are often used as a means of deception?
So my post is full of crap? Where exactly, point by point are my statements wrong, rationally and logically speaking, in my post #2?
Exactly which of my statements caused you to conclude that they were "without an ounce of intellect?"
Don't just make stuff up, and make wild statements about my ego or motives when they have naught to do with the questions at hand. You can't just say that I'm wrong, without justifying that claim with a valid reason.
I don't see any reasoning at all in your posts.
Which of my statements is "crap" and why is it crap?
You neglected to address this in your rant.
Saying its crap because you don't agree with it is NOT evidence that it is crap.