Maine farmer Posted March 23, 2017 Report Share Posted March 23, 2017 I recently annoyed someone with a post about the Wizard of Oz. Although I was trying to provide some levity, there was an actual chemistry question there. Is there no room in education for that sort of laid back, and even possibly fun approach to teaching science? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrKrettin Posted March 23, 2017 Report Share Posted March 23, 2017 Considering the amount of woo crap posted, your Wizard of Oz post was positively scientific. Why did somebody object? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maine farmer Posted March 23, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 23, 2017 It was proclaimed a "waste of time" It could be that my sense of humor just left a bitter feeling .(note my post about jokes being dangerous). On the subject of fiction in science education, I recall a college engineering class with a textbook problem with Superman getting shot, and we had to calculate the energy he absorbed from having the bullets bounce off of him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exchemist Posted March 23, 2017 Report Share Posted March 23, 2017 (edited) I recently annoyed someone with a post about the Wizard of Oz. Although I was trying to provide some levity, there was an actual chemistry question there. Is there no room in education for that sort of laid back, and even possibly fun approach to teaching science?Who says there is no one in chemistry with a sense of humour? : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsole :) It's even ring-shaped...... Edited March 23, 2017 by exchemist Maine farmer 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigD Posted March 24, 2017 Report Share Posted March 24, 2017 Who says there is no one in chemistry with a sense of humour? : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsole :)Arsoles are aromatic. Add a CH to an arsole and it becomes arsinine. :D I don’t think any comedic creativity is involved, though, as these funny names come from just applying standard nomenclature rules when adding a bit of arsenic to a benzene ring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exchemist Posted March 24, 2017 Report Share Posted March 24, 2017 (edited) Arsoles are aromatic. Add a CH to an arsole and it becomes arsinine. :D I don’t think any comedic creativity is involved, though, as these funny names come from just applying standard nomenclature rules when adding a bit of arsenic to a benzene ring.Yes I know. I was, er, yer know, joking. :) This is an interesting molecule. Evidently there is enough p-orbital overlap to give some pi-bonding (very slightly shorter bond length than C-As single bond) and some aromatic properties (e.g. ring current), in spite of the large size of a 4p orbital compared to the 2p ones on carbon. But as the Diels-Alder reaction shows, it is a sort of halfway house. I don't understand the conflicting information about its boiling point. It is described as both a liquid and a gas and the BP data gives a range. It is said that it decomposes on heating, but at what temperature and to give what products is not explained. Edited March 24, 2017 by exchemist Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maine farmer Posted March 25, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 25, 2017 (edited) I just came across a joke today. " How do tell a chemist from a plumber? Ask him (or her) to pronounce 'unionized'." Edited March 25, 2017 by Farming guy CraigD, hazelm and DrKrettin 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rumobrit111 Posted June 20, 2017 Report Share Posted June 20, 2017 I just came across a joke today. " How do tell a chemist from a plumber? Ask him (or her) to pronounce 'unionized'."lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hazelm Posted August 20, 2017 Report Share Posted August 20, 2017 There seem to be people who truly do not comprehend humor. Apparently those genes never developed. It's a serious handicap -- for the rest of us who want to share. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wiseshopper Posted July 30, 2018 Report Share Posted July 30, 2018 It's actually nice to incorporate science in fiction sometimes. Since science needs visuals and imaginations to portray the theories and laws, learning it through fiction will definitely be a helpful avenue. It also takes away the boredom into learning the concepts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hazelm Posted July 30, 2018 Report Share Posted July 30, 2018 (edited) Fact: I learned a lot of science from reading science fiction. Sensible SF, I must add. Ben Bova, Greg Bear, Asimov and on and on and on. Just skip the monsters and read the good stuff. Moreover most learning is better when taught with humor and fun. Don't let the brow-beaters get to you. Enjoy. And share all your good jokes with us. Edited July 30, 2018 by hazelm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larinika Posted June 23, 2019 Report Share Posted June 23, 2019 (edited) Remember the stories of Jules Verne. Once they seemed fantastic. But today, much has become a reality. Edited June 23, 2019 by larinika Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loveandsonship Posted January 16, 2021 Report Share Posted January 16, 2021 Clarke's 3 Laws? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loveandsonship Posted January 16, 2021 Report Share Posted January 16, 2021 (edited) The pseudo-natural phenomenon of television or radio is really just a magic trick/optical illusion. Edited January 16, 2021 by loveandsonship Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.