DiscovererOfNewKnowledge

OK you guys, I'm downloading the GIMP image working program and should be able to come out with some better explanations of exactly what's going on for you. I still maintain that you should be able to think about it on your own and get it, but I do understand that it can be a bit difficult to convey the full expression without my displaying the phenomenon to you exactly, which is what I did practically in this photo! http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3284/2860971015_5eb00fe77f.jpg?v=0 BY-NC-ND

Yes, yes, this is because of muscle contractions in the eye. These are not nearly as important as the idea of the diagram and the idea that one perceives things with one eye as the amount taken up in the visual field---- that is the key idea and that remains true. Judging depth happens in both eyes for sure, but it is not nearly as important with one eye, nor does the fact that you can judge depth a bit change the idea of the "amount of perceptual field" key concept.

OK, if you can't see that, then you aren't looking. It's the basic model of how much of the visual field of one eye gets taken up by two objects- those two objects being a bisected line segment. Then, specifically, we set a ratio of the angles to describe the ratio of the perceptional aspects of each line segment. Then, specifically, I discovered that the arc lengths happen to be in golden ratio. I'm sorry if it's hard to figure it out, but it would be good to try and grasp it on your own. When we then fold the radii onto each other, the phenomenon happens that we transform two hexagons into two pentagons exactly.

Our visual perception is 2D when we only look with one eye. The amount of space taken up in the perceptual field is due to ratio of angles at which light from two objects would enter the eye or be blocked from entering the eye. I would not say how it works in 3D. I'm only referring to how it works with one eye, but I could postulate some further ideas in 3D, but would prefer not to do so.

Yes, That is quite interesting, and I'm sure it relates to the diagram. However, however, the most interesting part of my diagram is the interrelatedness of the two hexagons, as well as their duel transformation into a pentagon. HA! also, the interrelatedness of perception, thus the title Geometric Patterns of Perceptions. I hope to be able to upload a new image with appropriate labels soon so that it'll make it more easier to understand what I'm doing. Hope you get a little bit of understanding out of it at least. It's quite common sensical, and you should really try to work it out for yourself, seeing as though it was discovered by a flash of intuition.

I post them in this forum to publicize the discovery and protect my right to be acknowledged as the first Earthly discoverer.

So, when we fold the radii onto each other, we see another expression of the Golden Ratio--- that being a regular pentagon. It only looks like a regular pentagon, however, and is actually a pentagon that comes from turning the vesica picis of the radii extending to the eye into metatron cubes, and then folding them onto each other, thus creating a cone.

So, I am back and able to discuss my discovery with you if you like. In regard to the perception aspect, as said in the paper, one perceives any two angle measures entering the eye as amounts of space that take up the perceptual field. So, the arc lengths are just a happy occurence of Golden Ratio. and it shows and proves that the Golden Ratio is present in the patterns of geometry which arise from viewing two equal line segments in a 2:1 ratio. This is interesting, because never before has it been shown that the golden ratio can be described as being the ratio of two whole numbers. I have proven in someways that it can be. I also would like to say that it is possible that with the application of group theory, the diagram could be turned into a quantum computer, but I would like to say that nobody is authorized to derive any further work on my discovery without first consulting me and getting my permission at powerinthelines@gmail.com

Yes, I'm sorry about that, however, this is an old version of the paper I'm writing and still requires a lot of redrafting. It was the quickest way to get the ideas across. One perceives the two equal line segments at the given angles I mention to be in a 2:1 ratio with each other. This is because the angle measures are acually in this ratio. The arc lengths that can be drawn are thus related to the golden ratio. When you fold up the radii, you get a conic of 5 intersecting equilateral triangles. I'll expound on this more when I get back from class. gotta run! peace ya'll

I have a 6 dimensional theory as to how photons get created. Take a sine wavelength.... Rip it in half until you get to the x axis then tear along the x axis in both directions then fold it up into a little packet----- that packet is a dS of space and is the way in which photons have both particle and wave duality. When the photon is in wave form, it is traveling. When it is in packet form, it has folded up in order to knock a certain electron out of orbit. WHAT DO YOU THINK??????!!!!! Am I right, Am I right?

Nobody is to tamper with these ideas without my consent. I will easily give consent to other people as long as the e-mail me about it and give credit where credit is due. That credit being to me. What do you mean, you can't copyright a geometric construction? Of course you can. It's like copyrighting any proof, paper, invention or idea. In any event, I'm the first to discover it, so give credit where credit is due. I only posted this knowledge after considerable goading into doing so. I have already told several other people in person about this idea and that I discovered it.

REal Golden on Flickr - Photo Sharing! Please note that these images are hosted on flickr, and that they are subject to the creative commons licensing of BY-NC-ND You are free: to Share — to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work Under the following conditions: Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3127/2860835751_81c98c44c5.jpg?v=0 http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3090/2860835743_33a7224d8f.jpg?v=0 http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3284/2860971015_5eb00fe77f.jpg?v=0 Please see my website http://www.myblogband.com and find me under piano listing under musicians for contact, also my website parkeremmerson.com is interesting. <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/88x31.png" /></a><br /><span xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" property="dc:title">Geometric Patterns of Perception</span> by <a xmlns:cc="http://creativecommons.org/ns#" href="http://hypography.com/forums/physics-and-mathematics/16193-geometric-patterns-of-perception-parker-emmerson.html" property="cc:attributionName" rel="cc:attributionURL">Parker Matthew Davis Emmerson</a> is licensed under a <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/">Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License</a>.<br />Based on a work at <a xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/30549435@N07/2860835743/in/photostream/" rel="dc:source">www.flickr.com</a>. ----- If it doesn't show up---- this is to say that this work is mine and not to be tampered with or distributed, and it is attached to the Creative Commons agreement of many different countries across the world and subject to the rights therein. Some have said this work cannot be copyrighted. I disagree, but am inclined to at least ask that credit be given to its discoverer: Parker Matthew Davis Emmerson Although this is a geometric construction and kind of mathematical proof, I constructed it, and thus I argue that it is applicable to copyright law. No distribution, sale, or derivative work may be done without sole permission of Parker Matthew Davis Emmerson. powerinthelines@gmail.com I am happy to discuss and allow work to be done on it under certain conditions, I just want to make sure it is protected and does not fall into malicious hands. I can copyright the diagram because I am also copyrighting the mechanism in which one folds the diagram. It transcends geometry to become art, which is copyrightable. Please view the above link for access to the diagrams, etc. A study of Golden Ratio Perception and Introduction to the coming paper Geometric Patterns of Perception By Parker Emmerson Through History, there have been many ways of portraying the Golden Ratio. In this paper, I am going to outline how the Golden Ratio plays into our everyday perception of reality. We are also going to go on a journey through Mathematics and Geometry to discover if there is any relation of our perception of reality on a daily basis. Please consult the Attached diagrams for a more in depth understanding of the symbology. The Science of this paper is in the power of Observation and the art of sacred geometry. It is close to pure science in that is is a direct response to inspiration and a science of the mind. The observation is philosophically spoken by saying that sacred geometry is a perspectival emanation of our reality. Some Background Information: R1=√(x^2+h^2) R2=√((x+l)^2+h^2) R3=√((x+2L)^2+h^2) Let us also note that: θ2=s/R=y/R2=y/√((x+l)^2+h^2) θ1=s/R=ϕy/R1=ϕy/√(x^2+h^2) It might be stated then that Theta 2= 1/2 Theta 1 Our first Postulate: λ=ϕ(ϕy)=L This creates an analogous relationship of y and ϕ That is like this: y: ϕy:: ϕy: (ϕ (ϕy)) The trigonometric relations which follow our diagram of 2:1 arc perception of two equal line segments for the angle θk are: tan(θk)= h/(L+x) = ϕy/(r2-r1)= ϕy/√(L^2-(ϕy)^2) sin(θk)= h/r2 = ϕy/L cos(θk)= L+x)/r2 = (r2-r1)/ ϕy = (√(L^2-(ϕy)^2))/ϕy) These trig relations show us that: R2-R1= √(L^2-(ϕy)^2) From this, we can definitively show that Theta K is constant and that it is equal to 38.17… degrees so long as our relation of L= ϕ (ϕy) stays the same. θk=38.17314 that is to say that: (sin(θk)*L)/y=ϕ; (sin(θk)*ϕ(ϕ y))/y=ϕ ϕy= sin(θk)*ø(øy) 1/ϕ= sin(θk) ϕ=1/ sin(θk) Now let us examine the other thetas, B, and T. tan(θ:)= h/x sin(θB)= h/√(((2L+x)^2)+h^2) cos(θB)= x/√(h^2+x^2) tan(θT)= h/(2L+x)=y/√(L^2-(y^2)=y/(R3-R2) sin(θT)=h/√(((2L+x)^2)+h^2)=y/L cos(θT)=(2L+x)/√(L^2-(y^2)) Theta T= 22.45 degrees We may then take radius R1 and fold it onto R2, then fold R2 onto R3, and the phenomenon which is therein seen is that not only do the outer hexagons described by the visica piscis which are constructed around each radius, respectively, transform into regular pentagons inscribed in a conic at the angle where 5 equilateral triangles combine to form a cone or 5-sided pyramid, but the inner hexagons do as well. Thank you, and sorry if I deprived anybody out there of discovering this on your own. Sincerely, Parker Emmerson powerinthleines@gmail.com I maintain copyright on these ideas so that proper use of them is made and advances are taken with precaution. I do not claim that I am the only creator of this. I believe that there is a divine power out there and that He is responsible for the gift of knowledge, the protection of truth, and the creation of the universe.

I will now make the post of the diagram here, and in the physics discussion forums. TO ALL OF THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN DENIED THE RIGHT TO DISCOVER THIS ON THEIR OWN, I AM TRULY SORRY. some people want to know just to collect knowledge. What they don't realize is that this will never lead them to any true knowledge or discoveries. They shall only have moderate access to the ability to understand the intuitive nature of what is herein laid out. The link below will take you to the diagram of GOLDEN ARC PERCEPTION. I reserve all rights to the images and the ideas presented, and no other may derive other work from the diagrams or concepts without my express permission. Flickr: poweringthelines' Photostream

This is just my 10th post so I can post the links I really want to post

I believe I have developed a diagram that begins to show how the beings might use the chemical structure of the compound interacting with our brain to transmit information to us through quark symmetries and reactions. Thus, the natural attitude is transcended through this structure of folding that I have discovered and copyrighted on flickr.... as soon as I get 10 posts, I'll post the link and the information. I belive the very chemical structure of the DMT allows the beings to unfold in dimensions and then collapse back into the dimension from which they came when we interact with the substance.

OK bucko, I'll tell you my idea, but it'll spoil the fun of figuring it out yourself, in your own way, in your own time, if that's what you'd really like... I can post it to the world, and then everyone will know the model I discovered. I'll post it under a creative commons license of no derivative as soon as I get enough posts to do so. Sorry to spoil the fun! Parker Emmerson

Hey man, check out my paper down below and tell me if you like it. I think there is a definite, clear difference between metaphysics and religion. In reality, this reality, the natural attitude toward this reality, we see life being the primary religion. We wake up every day, we go to work, we transform our lives in this way or that, we effect each other. Metaphysics is that aspect of life in which we are called to something within and without the object of physicality. It is a phenomenology of existence and subject object relations. It is tied to religion however in that is is sometimes the way that we attain spirituality out of our religious practices. It is transformation. It deals with the spiritual body and it's transcendence of the physical world. Religion just means waking up in the morning to go to your life as it is in the natural attitude. This, of course, through the spirit can find the way to bring the religious spirituality of everyday stuff to the focus of your life, thus bringing body to the spirit.

THIS IS THE START OF MY METAPHYSICS PAPER I POST IT UNDER THE A CREATIVE COMMONS LICENSE WHICH I WILL POST ONCE I GET 10 POSTS. I hereby state that this work is mine and may not be changed or altered in any way. On the Metatronic, Geometric, Pseudo-Physicalities of Divine Proportion: The Phenomenological Underpinnings of a New Quantum Posit and the Physics of Consciousness How can I exist without the preconception of certain metaphysical ideas which are founded in the construction of certain specific functionalities of the mind within the geometric object-subject relations for spatio-temporal frameworks? In this paper, I will show how, indeed, it would be impossible for me to exist without the metaphysical universe, that being the totality of all possible worlds, or thought perceptions in which the physical universe of objects within the spacetime matrix is able to be effected by certain mind capacities in relation to the natural worldview. In essence, this means that I would either have to cut these functions of the mind away if I were to presume the physicality of the electron, the particle, etc., or I would have to let go It is not evidential that the object exists outside of the geometries of energy and sheer transfer in spontaneity of essences. These metaphysical ideas, primarily, are based on the posit of that which we will refer to as “The Golden Ratio spacetime collapse-time extension,” hereto referred as Golden Arc Spacetime, or just Arc Spacetime. I would also quickly note that the chemical DMT and other tryptamines, which are produced naturally in the human brain, have a similar structure to this diagram of the Golden Arc. In this way, we may begin to discuss the way in which the essence of the geometries are inherent in the nature of the Golden Ratio and begin to correlate shamanic experiences to the physical realm. Take for instance, this image of the chemical structure and compare it to the discovery I made regarding folds of Divinely Proportionate arc lengths. The shamanic experience tells us of how many experience time and space in a new way, archetypes of the collective unconscious, ability to inensely interact and perceive the manifestation of mana, and many other psychedelic phenomena. Quark symmetries share the some of the same geometry present in both the chemical DMT, and Golden Arc Diagrams. We see two interactions going on in the diagram, whoever An understanding can possibly be attained by comparing quark symmetry geometries to the chemical reactions taking place in the brain’s engaging in psychedelic experience through this geometric formation. In the new metatronic quantum posit, they would essentially be correlated through a transcendence and setting aside of our everyday world view that objects truly exist. The material for this new metatronic quantum posit is derived solely from the innate intuition of mind, regardless of the objects it may use to describe the map of consciousness. The new metatronic quantum posit allows us to see the structures of relation of subject to object within the realm of pure consciousness. The argument is thus: the sheer fact that I can conceive of an alternative spacetime geometry for the electron and positron charge exchange within two atoms is enough to utterly disprove the necessary existence of an electron in common quantum and classical terms. For these models do not even find the destination they were hoping to find. It does not negate the idea of a charge, nor does it negate the validity of the electron as a valid model of science which gives us access to certain ideas and knowledge. It does, however, prove false the determined necessity of the electron for the transfer of energy essence. A quantum leap, in the new Metatronic physicality suggests a jump in energy levels would be correlated to the folding of three radii in direct proportion to the Golden Ratio arc lengths outlined by these radii when placed in relation to the two equal objects. Thus, the energy escaping in the form of light, or other essential geometry would then be somehow stored in higher dimension. Thus, the geometries of essence show a drop in Energy level and subsequent release of energy in current quantum physical terms through the sine wave tie. It shows us how the multiplicity of the atoms does not necessarily exist, and it brings us to totality and unity. We however do not just want to place doubt and skepticism. Just as Husserl searches for consciousness, we shall exclude all of the physics and the theoretical. The Golden Arc Spacetime is no theory at all. It is a simple posited axiom and demonstratable model of how electrons are not particles or waves, but simply geometries of energy, or, to exclude physics, geometries of it’s own structural existence and being; that which is spirit and body. Energy levels and “electron transfer” in essence, are now described as folds which occur at the Golden Ratio arc lengths in proportion with two equal objects. One could understand that this Golden Arc science is the purest kind of science. It is not even based on empiricism, but more it is based on a science of thought and mind. Of course, it is easiest to reach our destination by means of empiricism and observation, however, it would not be necessary that one have to perceive the nature of the diagram with tactility or vision in order to have access and knowledge of it’s relationships. This is because it is as close to the pure science as has been found, because it requires only that one deliberate in the functions of the mind and the folds of spatio-temporal being. Evidence of the accuracy, necessity, and destiny of the Golden Arc Spacetime is inherent within the inherent, but attached formal description of the the way in which one may fold two equal line segments at Golden Ratio arc lengths. The Golden Arc Spacetime geometry is the essence of consciousness. This is because not only does it provide the framework for all valid metaphysical discussions, it is sheer proof and geometric relation of the subject-object interaction. For instance, the subject, or subjectivity is present in the idea and point in fact that the angles derived from the intersection of the radii extending end point of the two line segments can be related to the angles at which one would perceive said equal line segments at some ratio (note: this ratio is not Golden Ratio). This provides a geometric outline of perception of measure, thus perception of man if we say that “man is the measure of all things.” To say it another way, the diagram on one hand shows us how the eye perceives, while at the same time, it’s implications are that two dimensional projections of three dimensional objects in two point perspective can be uniquely and specifically folded to transform into the matching of objects used in the construction of the projections to each other in the form of a regular pentagon. We are able to transform from a hexagon (a two dimensional projection of three dimensions at two point perspective) to a pentagon only at the angles which are a part of Golden Arc Spacetime perception/objectivation in regard to equality of two objects.

Thanks for the info

Hey guys, I think in order to get a grasp of infinity, a new mathematics should be developed to account for infinity withing cyclic group theory. In essence finding the right regression formula to take us deep into the infinity of the numbers 1, 2, 3, then showing how much infinity is necessary to reset the cycle of the group, this will show us how infinity can be tied in the ALPHA and OMEGA. Hope that helps with the infinity in finite space sort of thing.

I mean honestly, what do they think this is going to do? Let's do it faster, faster, faster.... really, they just need to put these things in the right structure and run them around so that they collide at the right angles in the right proportions to get the effect they are looking for. I do think the data should take years to sort through and I hope I can get my hands on a bit of it, although, the geometries will be poorly understood for years.

Listen, buster, I got the knowledge, you don't. If I tell everyone what my idea is, it won't be any good, they'll just think they know what it means, but will never have intuited themselves. I was just introducing myself, is my claim that I am a person, not a computer to be doubted??? Hmm... I wonder if it could be. In any event, this monologue should express my distaste for your comments. LISTEN BUSTER----- don't treat my claims that I have knowledge that you don't as being unsubstantial--- don't even attempt to suggest that they are or are not unsubstantial.... I'll have you know that they are the most brilliant work of geometry in this century so far, and when I get the right creative commons license, I might be inclined to post them, but for now, I've got my poor man's copyright, and I've told plenty of well known scientists about my knowledge, and they all agree it's valid. If you don't want to know, be a cat and get skinned and don't e-mail me. you can't even say if they are or are not, so drop dead of your own accord in your own time, and leave me out of it. You are totally lame man, you think science is this and that and the evidence by perception.... get over it, mine is a science of the mind, thus I'll keep my knowledge in this very mind, and not bother showing it to you I can say that I have knowledge that you don't, and I don't have to tell you what it is. Obviously, if you are going to get all punky about whether or not my claim is substantiated, you better have some claim of your own that it isn't, otherwise get out of my post and don't come back. I don't share my ideas on the internet, because people rip ideas off on the internet all the time. Also, they are not ideas that are to be known by the average scientist. They would blow your mind and you would turn to drivel. No, no I'm really just playing with you, and it's my wacky attitude that throws you off. Don't be thrown off, just keep to yourself and figure it out on your own, if you can.... That way, it's more fun, that way, it's truly enlightening. I shall repeat: If I tell everyone what my idea is, it won't be any good, they'll just think they know what it means, but will never have intuited themselves

So, I'm a physics student at Marlboro College. I am also the discoverer of fascinating new science phenomena. You would probably like to know, but I'm keeping the knowledge to myself for now. If you want to know, you can e-mail me and we'll set up a non-disclosure agreement. Powerinthelines Mwahahaha! We shall travel in time by the end of the century. THE OMEGA POINT THEORY ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jesus is probably already back on Earth! Peace Galactica, Parker