Jump to content
Science Forums

Who's Afraid of a Solar Flare?


Recommended Posts

Last month, the sun went haywire. Almost every day for two weeks in early September, solar flares issued from a giant sunspot named "active region 798/808." X-rays ionized Earth’s upper atmosphere. Solar protons peppered the Moon. It was not a good time to be in space.


lefthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/iss_thumb.jpg[/img]Or was it?


During the storms, something strange happened onboard the International Space Station (ISS): radiation levels dropped.


"The crew of the ISS absorbed about 30% fewer cosmic rays than usual," says Frank Cucinotta, NASA's chief radiation health officer at the Johnson Space Center. "The storms actually improved the radiation environment inside the station."


Scientists have long known about this phenomenon. It's called a "Forbush decrease," after American physicist Scott E. Forbush, who studied cosmic rays in the 1930s and 40s. When cosmic rays hit Earth's upper atmosphere, they produce a shower of secondary particles that can reach the ground. By monitoring these showers he noticed, contrary to intuition, that cosmic ray doses dropped when solar activity was high.


righthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/forbush_thumb.jpg[/img]The reason is simple: When sunspots explode, they often hurl massive clouds of hot gas away from the sun. These clouds, called CMEs (coronal mass ejections), contain not only gas but also magnetic force fields, knots of magnetism ripped away from the sun by the explosion. Magnetic fields deflect charged particles, so when a CME sweeps past Earth, it also sweeps away many of the electrically-charged cosmic rays that would otherwise strike our planet. This is the "Forbush decrease."


Wherever CMEs go, cosmic rays are deflected. Forbush decreases have been observed on Earth and in Earth orbit onboard Mir and the ISS. The Pioneer 10 and 11 and Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft have experienced them, too, beyond the orbit of Neptune.


A single CME can suppress cosmic rays for a few weeks. Sustained solar activity can suppress them for a much longer time: "2005 has been a surprisingly active year on the sun," notes Cucinotta. Since January, astronomers have counted 14 powerful X-class solar flares and an even greater number of CMEs. As a result, "the crew of the ISS has absorbed fewer cosmic rays all year long."


This whole story is ironic because flares and CMEs are themselves sources of deadly radiation. CMEs, in particular, cause "proton storms." En route to Earth, CMEs race through the sun's outer atmosphere, plowing through the hot gas at speeds exceeding a million miles per hour. Protons caught in the path of a CME can be accelerated to dangerous energies.


No astronaut wants to encounter a swarm of high-energy solar protons. Severe storms are literally sickening; exposure causes vomiting, fatigue and low blood counts. Without medical attention, an astronaut suffering from radiation sickness could die. Now for the good news: few solar protons are able to penetrate the hulls of NASA spaceships. As long as astronauts stay inside, they're safe.


Cosmic rays are different - and worse. Cosmic rays are super-charged subatomic particles coming mainly from outside our solar system. Sources include exploding stars, black holes and other characters that dwarf the sun in violence. Unlike solar protons, which are relatively easy to stop with materials such as aluminum or plastic, cosmic rays cannot be completely stopped by any known shielding technology.


Even inside their ships, astronauts are exposed to a slow drizzle of cosmic rays coming right through the hull. The particles penetrate flesh, damaging tissue at the microscopic level. One possible side-effect is broken DNA, which can, over the course of time, cause cancer, cataracts and other maladies.


No one knows all the things cosmic rays might do to humans. "We haven't been in space long enough," says Cucinotta.


Except during brief trips to the Moon forty years ago, he explains, astronauts have never been fully exposed to galactic cosmic rays. Close to Earth where the ISS orbits, crews are protected not only by their ship's hull, but also by Earth's magnetic field and the gigantic solid body of Earth itself. A 6-month trip to Mars, far from these natural shields, is something new. What are the long-term risks? How much shielding is needed to keep astronauts safe? NASA researchers are grappling with these questions.


One thing is clear. "Reducing exposure is a good thing," he says.


The sun can help. Every 11 years, solar activity reaches a fever pitch called Solar Max. It last happened in 2000; future episodes are due around 2011 and 2022. During Solar Max, CMEs are produced daily, and the solar wind blows knotty magnetic fields through the inner solar system as a matter of routine. These fields provide a measure of extra protection for trips to the Moon and Mars, dropping cosmic ray fluxes in the biologically dangerous energy range 100 MeV to 1000 MeV by 30% or more. Mission planners of the future might actually schedule long trips through the solar system to coincide, roughly, with Solar Max, thus taking advantage of this decline in cosmic rays.


Maybe solar flares aren't so bad after all.


Source: Science@NASA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

few solar protons are able to penetrate the hulls of NASA spaceships

You go. Uncle Al will stay under 760 torr of atmospheric pressure equal to the shielding from a 90+ cm thickness of lead (without pair formation from beta rays grazing heavy nuclei, followed by gamma ray emission). How many NASA "spaceships" have lead walls 35+ inches thick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The observation that high energy protons can cause an immediate physical health effect shows how important hydrogen bonding is to the continuiity of living state. Its disruption within the body by a shower of protons causes immediate holistic impact on cells and entire multicellular organisms. The long term effect of cosmic rays on the DNA shows the stability of the DNA molecule due to covalent bonding. The hydrogen bonding is more weak and more fundamental to the real time stability and activity of the entire cell and the entire multicellular organism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you not just energise an insulated high-temp superconducting magnetic coil around the ship? Yes, it would be tricky (due to the magnetic field) but it would provide a deflection system.


Also, what if the solar event focuses the beams onto you, rather than bends them away? Will you suddenly be like an ant under a magnifiying glass?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You didn't mention my favorite phenominon attributed to solar flares! (I hope i'm still up to date on this ;) ) The Northern Lights! :) Which have been quite spectacular this year I might add! (Usually we only get green waves and pulsations but this year we got purple, red, and orange as well!!!!!!! Which looks marvelous over Lake Erie and the lights of Long Point, Canada! :) Which is a peninsula 16 miles to the north of here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you not just energise an insulated high-temp superconducting magnetic coil around the ship? Yes, it would be tricky (due to the magnetic field) but it would provide a deflection system.


dont know about this one but there is work been done on cold plasma's to work as shielding from radiation and they are hoping one day even projectiles!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...