Jump to content
Science Forums

Bigotry, is there a fair test for it?


Larv

Recommended Posts

A drama is being played out here in the green state of Washington. Our new “everything-but-marriage” law, fully legalizing same-sex domestic partnerships, is being challenged by the religious right via Referendum 71. They think there are all sorts of good reasons for not allowing same-sex domestic partnerships, including religious reasons. They give voice to those who feel same-sex domestic partnerships threaten traditional marriage.

 

I know such a person, Ralph, and he believes that the homosexuals are the real bigots. And I know homosexuals who believe that Ralph is the real bigot. So who is the real bigot?

 

There ought to be a fair test for bigotry. Couldn’t bigotry be simply defined as an expression of intolerance for another person’s point of view?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being intolerant of bigotry is not itself a form of bigotry, and to suggest otherwise shows a deep misunderstanding of the way the term "bigotry" is used in our vernacular.

But, IN, how do you know which form of bigotry is actually bigotry? What test can you come up with that identifies true bigotry?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

okay Larv,

no matter what type of spin you are now putting on it, this is the same old stuff of the other threads.Is there no end to this madness?

OK, pam, then close it down. I didn't intend to propagate more madness. I intended only to follow up on CriagD's suggestion.

 

btw: I'm unclear about this so-called spin. The only spin on bigotry that's been spun has come from those who are emotionally intolerant of opposing points of view

Link to comment
Share on other sites

okay larv,

let me check out craigs suggestion, i would hate to assume anything;)

pamela, this new thread is not really that close to what CraigD was talking about; he's into public-attitude statistics concerning the acceptance of legalizing gay and lesbian relations. I see it all as a matter of tolerance v. intolerance on both sides of the issue. Hence I started this thread on testing for bigotry.

 

Please shut it down if you think is it just creates more madness; there's been plenty of that already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn’t bigotry be simply defined as an expression of intolerance for another person’s point of view?

 

Yep.

 

As far as testing for bigotry, I'm not sure there's a good method for that. But here's a shot at it. :hihi:

 

Suppose you came up with a list of ten highly contentious issues (abortion, death penalty, etc.) and then used that list to generate simple questions such as "How do you feel about this issue". The people being tested could respond on a scale of 1-5 (strongly disagree-strongly agree). Those that answered 1 or 5 could be seen as showing a strong predilection. But it still wouldn't show bigotry. You'd have to use that sample of people to devise another test. Perhaps it could be a computer program that shows images or text and then the person could type in a word they associate with the image or text (images and text would depict situations related to the original contentious issues). The word choices would have to be limited to something like 12 with words such as: hate, love, like, dislike, relate, can not relate, etc. Again, the extremes would be measured and a corresponding "level of bigotry" could be assigned. It would probably be a bell curve.

 

But what would that really tell us?

"Bigot" is such a subjective word. What defines "intolerance"? We all know it when we see it, but how do we pin it down to a black or white scenario?

 

I don't think anyone can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no simple formula, as what matters most is the subject of the intolerance. Yes, many of us are intolerant of logical fallacies, poor/unsupported arguments, and the spread of falsehoods and misinformation. However, there is good reason for that.

 

Bigotry is more about people being different from yourself, and about casting them with all sorts of negative connotations and false attributes. Usually, bigotry applies to people who are hateful, xenophobic, and jingoistic... as those emotions they feel are not grounded in any solid reasoning nor rationality.

 

The point is the subject of the intolerance, and what is motivating it.

 

 

Being intolerant of lies is a good thing, and has a recognizable and practical purpose underlying it.

Being intolerant of violence or rape is a good thing, as that too has a recognizable and practical purpose underlying it.

It is these recognizable and practical purposes informing the intolerance which prevent it from being called bigotry.

 

Bigotry is when one is intolerant for no practical reason... usually just something like "they" are "different." Bigotry is most often felt toward foreigners and immigrants, like the Mexicans for example. It was (and sometimes still is) found in the feelings whites had toward blacks. Today, it is often found among heterosexuals and the feelings they hold toward homosexuals.

 

It's about the fact that these folks are being intolerant for no real practical purpose. They are being intolerant because "they" are "different." It's bigotry because it tends to be informed by jingoism and xenophobia, or some religiously motivated worldview, and has no real rational purpose underlying it.

 

But... intolerance which has a practical and justifiable purpose is NOT bigotry... not by any means. Just because I'm intolerant of lies, hate speech, and ignorance does not make me a bigot, since that intolerance has a justifiable and practical purpose informing it.

 

 

Just some thoughts for you to consider. :hihi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defining "bigot" in google returns the following:

 

  • a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own
  • one who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; one who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion ...
  • bigotry - the intolerance and prejudice of a bigot
  • bigoted - blindly and obstinately attached to some creed or opinion and intolerant toward others; "a bigoted person"; "an outrageously bigoted point of view"
  • bigoted - Being a bigot; biased; strongly prejudiced; forming opinions without just cause
  • bigotry - intolerance toward those of different creeds or religious affiliations
  • bigotry - The rigid intolerance of ideas or persons seen as different.

 

...which clearly shows that, yes, a homosexual can very well be a bigot, as well.

 

If you are prejudiced (a heterosexual being prejudiced against homosexuals, or a homosexual being prejudiced against heterosexuals) and intolerant without just cause, then, yes - you're a bigot.

 

Consider a homosexual caught with his hands in the cookie jar at work. He's tried for theft. He objects, because the judge, the prosecutor and the jury are heterosexuals and will be biased against him. His sexuality has nothing to do with the crime he is tried for, and will have no bearings as to the technicalities of the case. Yes - he is a bigot.

 

But so what? I fail to see the mystery here.

 

In as much as one gets black racists, one gets homosexual bigots and hypocrites, too.

 

The term "bigot", however, is being used too easily without considering the meaning of it. In many instances, those who bandy the term about are as intolerant and prejudiced as those they accuse of it. It has devolved into a knee-jerk reaction to taint the opposition's argument. So before you go about calling somebody a bigot, think very carefully about your own position and assumptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...which clearly shows that, yes, a homosexual can very well be a bigot, as well.

This is true and already well demonstrated in other threads.

 

The term "bigot", however, is being used too easily without considering the meaning of it. In many instances, those who bandy the term about are as intolerant and prejudiced as those they accuse of it. It has devolved into a knee-jerk reaction to taint the opposition's argument. So before you go about calling somebody a bigot, think very carefully about your own position and assumptions.

My bolding to emphasize the truth in this statement. I've seen more heterophobia than homophobia on these threads, especially when it comes down to therapies psychologists have available to treat confused adolescents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen more heterophobia than homophobia on these threads, especially when it comes down to therapies psychologists have available to treat confused adolescents.

 

So, you are now suggesting that people who argue for the accurate representation of what a scientific study is stating regarding the lack of effectiveness of a given treatment program are "bigoted" and they are "heterophobic" for doing so?

 

Interesting. Good to know. Thanks for calling that to my attention. I never knew that the drive for accuracy and academic integrity were the same as bigotry against heterosexuals. I guess you learn something new everyday. :ohdear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, you are now suggesting that people who argue for the accurate representation of what a scientific study is stating regarding the lack of effectiveness of a given treatment program are "bigoted" and they are "heterophobic" for doing so?

 

Interesting. Good to know. Thanks for calling that to my attention. I never knew that the drive for accuracy and academic integrity were the same as bigotry against heterosexuals. I guess you learn something new everyday. :ohdear:

Infinite, there is no scientific study that proves that ALL trouble adolescents who question their sexualities are always gay. There is ostensively a gray area, a gap, wherein troubled adolescents flounder between their hetero tendencies and their homo tendencies. If you are so absolutely certain that ALL troubled adolescents who are uncertain about their sexual orientations are, in fact, gay or lesbian then please provide proof for your position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Infinite, there is no scientific study that proves that ALL trouble adolescents who question their sexualities are always gay.

<...>

If you are so absolutely certain that ALL troubled adolescents who are uncertain about their sexual orientations are, in fact, gay or lesbian then please provide proof for your position.

 

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for, on my behalf, capitalizing the word which clearly demonstrates how you are arguing against a blatant strawman. It is much appreciated. :ohdear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for, on my behalf, capitalizing the word which clearly demonstrates how you are arguing against a blatant strawman. It is much appreciated. :ohdear:

And I would like to compliment you for your clever smilies and utterly avoiding my challenge. Gaps or no gaps, Mr. Infinite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, it might just be me but I am having trouble following this conversation. As defined earlier in this thread, a bigot can be

a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from his own.

 

Why would homosexuals be bigots? All they want is fair treatment and rights to marry, just like everbody else has. Isnt this country supposed to promote Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness? I mean, it says it in the constitution (which we dont seem to follow anymore...) and if living your life married to the same gender will make you happy, go right ahead. This country also grants us liberty right? Freedom right? So when somebody denies you the right to marry just because they read a book that was written thousands of years ago (and we dont even know if it was intented to be non-fiction!) and then they decide they are right and everybody else is wrong. The people who want what they are told they can have are not bigots, they are just people who want to live their lives in happiness. And who are you to say that they cant?

 

 

I think you are posting under a misconceptiion here... :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...