Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

I looked at several threads about using browns gas as a supplement to give a car better gas mileage but it seems no sure yes or no to this mileage booster was given. The Internet is full of adds to use browns gas generated on board you car as you drive to give huge mileage boosts. To me it looks a lot like perpetual motion. Has any definitive answers been found for this? Steven Harris seems to the main proponent of this idea, he has impressive credentials, is he on the up and up?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

why do you think i have a doctorate in industrial process control get your calculator we will work through this this calculation is for an engine that displaces twice its capacity per revolution and h

dc current will electrolize water ac wont you will also need a large variable resistor and a heap of hight wattage globes to adjust the dc current through the fuel cel to ground

Just a little bit more on my rant:)   the average sedan or voupe has a base hp of anywhere between 110-130 hp and unless you peg your tach often you'll only use the peak hp 1% of the time so as far a

It is perpetual motion.

 

Using energy from the car to produce hydrogen costs the vehicle useful energy. Putting that energy back into the engine in the form of the hydrogen you produced is completely pointless. You're bound to loose efficiency in all the steps needed. Gasoline is already an efficient fuel. Why would you use it to make electricity then use the electricity for electrolysis that makes excess heat then use the electrolysis product as fuel for the engine? I don't get it. :(

 

Did you notice if any of the websites making these claims addressed this?

 

~modest

Link to post
Share on other sites
It is perpetual motion.

 

Using energy from the car to produce hydrogen costs the vehicle useful energy. Putting that energy back into the engine in the form of the hydrogen you produced is completely pointless. You're bound to loose efficiency in all the steps needed. Gasoline is already an efficient fuel. Why would you use it to make electricity then use the electricity for electrolysis that makes excess heat then use the electrolysis product as fuel for the engine? I don't get it. :(

 

Did you notice if any of the websites making these claims addressed this?

 

~modest

 

A couple seemed to be saying the browns gas improved combustion enough to make gas mileage claims but most didn't give any specifics other then huge gas mileage. I'm taking a real beating on this trying to explain why it's not possible then you google it and your see hundreds of links to people saying huge gas mileage increases. Hard to get through to them. So far I've seen no sites that counter this stuff at all it seems they are getting a free ride scamming people.

Link to post
Share on other sites
A couple seemed to be saying the browns gas improved combustion enough to make gas mileage claims but most didn't give any specifics other then huge gas mileage.

 

Interesting that the same people who claim HHO doesn't explode also claim it "improves combustion". It does exactly opposite things depending on which extraordinary claim is being made :(

 

I'm taking a real beating on this trying to explain why it's not possible then you google it and your see hundreds of links to people saying huge gas mileage increases.

 

Probably all written by the same person. Someone who sells the HHO generators perhaps.

 

Hard to get through to them. So far I've seen no sites that counter this stuff at all it seems they are getting a free ride scamming people.

 

Trust the experts:

 

Brown's Gas information

 

Notice they're not trying to sell anything.

 

~modest

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm confused. Do you mean a six stroke motor using HHO? Like supplementing Brown's gas for water in a six stroke? Or, do you mean to compare a six stroke to HHO? Or, perhaps you mean just to comment on the extra efficiency of a six stroke.

 

I will say HHO is diametrically different from a six stroke in that the six stroke uses waste heat to increase efficiency whereas an HHO generator takes its energy directly from the electrical system of the car (basically from the car's fuel).

 

~modest

Link to post
Share on other sites

why use a cylinder type engine with heaps of moving parts when you can have down to 2 moving parts and perfect balance no need for oil and fuel because water and hydrocloride are reversable reactions when split with dc current and with a correctly engineered system you can get up to 2 million % efficient go to the soilinspection site to download the doc

Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm confused. Do you mean a six stroke motor using HHO? Like supplementing Brown's gas for water in a six stroke? Or, do you mean to compare a six stroke to HHO? Or, perhaps you mean just to comment on the extra efficiency of a six stroke.

 

I will say HHO is diametrically different from a six stroke in that the six stroke uses waste heat to increase efficiency whereas an HHO generator takes its energy directly from the electrical system of the car (basically from the car's fuel).

 

~modest

 

 

Sorry, I changed horses in mid stream, I was thinking about how silly the whole run your car on water thing is then it occurred to me that there was an engine whose power is supplemented by water, the six stroke motor! No silly HHO required and a real efficiency increase.

Link to post
Share on other sites
why use a cylinder type engine with heaps of moving parts when you can have down to 2 moving parts and perfect balance no need for oil and fuel because water and hydrocloride are reversable reactions when split with dc current and with a correctly engineered system you can get up to 2 million % efficient go to the soilinspection site to download the doc

 

How about providing some specifics on that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is how it all works

1 amp for 1 hour makes 6 litres of gas at 1 bar

1 litre of water makes 2039 litres of water gas

1 cc of gas has an expansion ratio of 1729/1

combustion temperatures: 6000 deg C to 600,000 deg C for water

thus proves the alternator can supply adequate power to make gas to burn and recirculate

soilinspection

Link to post
Share on other sites
here is how it all works

1 amp for 1 hour makes 6 litres of gas at 1 bar

1 litre of water makes 2039 litres of water gas

1 cc of gas has an expansion ratio of 1729/1

combustion temperatures: 6000 deg C to 600,000 deg C for water

thus proves the alternator can supply adequate power to make gas to burn and recirculate

soilinspection

 

No, it takes more energy to make browns gas than you get from burning it. You can't get something for nothing. What you are proposing is no different than using a battery to run an electric motor to turn a generator to charge the battery. Can't work, perpetual motion is not possible.:doh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

toyota said it invalidated the 2nd law of themodynamics it only needs headlight current to make the gas which turns back into water or hydrocloride after detanation with a spark, this causes heat electrolysis in a fuel cell makes the gas, you circulate everything in a sealed loop with a gas noble gas, download it and work it out

Link to post
Share on other sites
toyota said it invalidated the 2nd law of themodynamics it only needs headlight current to make the gas which turns back into water or hydrocloride after detanation with a spark, this causes heat electrolysis in a fuel cell makes the gas, you circulate everything in a sealed loop with a gas noble gas, download it and work it out

 

You are talking nonsense, you cannot get more out of the gas than you put into it, not even most of what you put into it. At every step of the process you loose power.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do you think i have a doctorate in industrial process control get your calculator we will work through this this calculation is for an engine that displaces twice its capacity per revolution and has been proven to be 73% eficient as i was a design after i had finished my design the same but had a compression stroke the displacement is 1 litre we want to turn the engine at 3,000 revs so we displace 6,000 litres of gas out of the exaust. So we take the expansion ratio of 1729 and divide that into 6,000 gives you 3.47litres of water gas which is a current flow of approxamately 40 amps to produce the whole effect. it all in the water powered engine download on the soilinspection site

Link to post
Share on other sites
why do you think i have a doctorate in industrial process control get your calculator we will work through this this calculation is for an engine that displaces twice its capacity per revolution and has been proven to be 73% eficient as i was a design after i had finished my design the same but had a compression stroke the displacement is 1 litre we want to turn the engine at 3,000 revs so we displace 6,000 litres of gas out of the exaust. So we take the expansion ratio of 1729 and divide that into 6,000 gives you 3.47litres of water gas which is a current flow of approxamately 40 amps to produce the whole effect. it all in the water powered engine download on the soilinspection site

 

Look Dr. I don't care if you are Einstein you cannot change the laws of nature. What you are proposing is no different than using a battery to run a motor to turn a generator to charge the battery. It's just another way to show perpetual motion and perpetual motion is not possible. For your idea to work you have to add energy somewhere along the line.

Link to post
Share on other sites
why do you think i have a doctorate in industrial process control get your calculator we will work through this this calculation is for an engine that displaces twice its capacity per revolution and has been proven to be 73% eficient as i was a design after i had finished my design the same but had a compression stroke the displacement is 1 litre we want to turn the engine at 3,000 revs so we displace 6,000 litres of gas out of the exaust. So we take the expansion ratio of 1729 and divide that into 6,000 gives you 3.47litres of water gas which is a current flow of approxamately 40 amps to produce the whole effect. it all in the water powered engine download on the soilinspection site

 

No one is saying water doesn't have the available energy to run a vehicle. You missed the point entirely. Liberating the hydrogen from water costs energy. Water is not readily usable as a source of chemical energy. As a Dr. and someone who graduated middle school, you should know this. And, you should recognize it is the problem. MTM made this abundantly clear.

 

~modest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...