Jump to content
Science Forums

Did ecletron ever die ???


quatumrulesoverall

Recommended Posts

Does it exist inside the nucleus ? Or where is it found ??? Would it affect any properties of the whole atom ????

 

It's not part of an atom. It exists by itself... as far as humans know.

Perhaps in some other dimension or something atoms have positrons instead of electrons, but obviously it doesn't matter since it would all be speculative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everthing in this world has a beginning and then an end? Would in at any moment in time electron be considered as die ???

Waiting for all of your reply.

According to the Standard Model, I don’t think an electron can transform into any combination of particles that doesn’t include an electron, so my answer would be “an electron can’t ‘die’”.

 

As several previous posts have noted, an electron and its antiparticle, a positron, can interact to produce a 2 photons, and at some energies, also particles with mass, such as mesons.

So, is positron just another theory, and yet has not been seen?
Positrons have been observed in large numbers. They’re fairly easy to detect, due to the characteristic emission of 2 photons with frequencies in the gamma (2.4*10^18 + hz) range when one collide and annihilate with an electron.

 

This is discussed more in "’Antimatter factories’" in operation now and other posts in the recent thread 7204.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

… everything should have been cleared since according to some scientists the no of positron is equivalent as no of electrons.
Why the universe contains anything but energy in the form of photons is one of the deep mysteries of physics.

 

Early theories suggested that the presence of matter rather than antimatter was due to random quantum fluctuations and luck – that the universe is just as likely to be made of antimatter as matter. The current best theory to explain how this came about, charge-parity symmetry violation.

 

Along with other symmetry violations, CP violation is an important theory. It won the 1980 Nobel Prize in Physics. Although the theory accurately predicts experimental observations, and roughly accounts for the presence of matter in the universe, it’s yet to be integrated into the fundamental formalism of quantum mechanics. The ongoing search for a “Theory of Everything”, which has generated such theories as string theory and holographic theory, is an attempt to fix this and other failings of current theories of quantum mechanics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the beginning of everything there was a little bit more matter compared to antimatter. Matter, antimatter ratio : 1+10^(-7) : 1

 

One can "produce" an electron and a positron by colliding gamma rays or two electrons in high speed.

For example if you collide two electrons e-,e- you could end up with e-,e- and e-,e+ (e+ being the positron). It may seem strange that e-,e+ comes up from nothing, but as matter is closely connected to energy (special relativity E=mc^2) some of the energy turns into e-,e+.

 

Positrons are used in some medical diagnostic devices as the PET scan (Positron Emission Tomography)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...