Jump to content
Science Forums

Plastic Spaceships


C1ay
 Share

Recommended Posts

After reading this article, you might never look at trash bags the same way again.

 

lefthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/plastic_spaceship_thumb.jpg[/img]We all use plastic trash bags; they're so common that we hardly give them a second thought. So who would have guessed that a lowly trash bag might hold the key to sending humans to Mars?

 

Most household trash bags are made of a polymer called polyethylene. Variants of that molecule turn out to be excellent at shielding the most dangerous forms of space radiation. Scientists have long known this. The trouble has been trying to build a spaceship out of the flimsy stuff.

 

But now NASA scientists have invented a groundbreaking, polyethylene-based material called RXF1 that's even stronger and lighter than aluminum. "This new material is a first in the sense that it combines superior structural properties with superior shielding properties," says Nasser Barghouty, Project Scientist for NASA's Space Radiation Shielding Project at the Marshall Space Flight Center.

 

To Mars in a plastic spaceship? As daft as it may sound, it could be the safest way to go.

 

Less is more

Protecting astronauts from deep-space radiation is a major unsolved problem. Consider a manned mission to Mars: The round-trip could last as long as 30 months, and would require leaving the protective bubble of Earth's magnetic field. Some scientists believe that materials such as aluminum, which provide adequate shielding in Earth orbit or for short trips to the Moon, would be inadequate for the trip to Mars.

 

Barghouty is one of the skeptics: "Going to Mars now with an aluminum spaceship is undoable," he believes.

 

righthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/particle-production_thumb.jpg[/img]Plastic is an appealing alternative: Compared to aluminum, polyethylene is 50% better at shielding solar flares and 15% better for cosmic rays.

 

The advantage of plastic-like materials is that they produce far less "secondary radiation" than heavier materials like aluminum or lead. Secondary radiation comes from the shielding material itself. When particles of space radiation smash into atoms within the shield, they trigger tiny nuclear reactions. Those reactions produce a shower of nuclear byproducts -- neutrons and other particles -- that enter the spacecraft. It's a bit like trying to protect yourself from a flying bowling ball by erecting a wall of pins. You avoid the ball but get pelted by pins. "Secondaries" can be worse for astronauts' health than the original space radiation!

 

lefthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/ethylene.jpg[/img]Ironically, heavier elements like lead, which people often assume to be the best radiation shielding, produce much more secondary radiation than lighter elements like carbon and hydrogen. That's why polyethylene makes good shielding: it is composed entirely of lightweight carbon and hydrogen atoms, which minimizes secondaries.

 

These lighter elements can't completely stop space radiation. But they can fragment the incoming radiation particles, greatly reducing the harmful effects. Imagine hiding behind a chain-link fence to protect yourself in a snowball fight: You'll still get some snow on you as tiny bits of snowball burst through the fence, but you won't feel the sting of a direct hit from a hard-packed whopper. Polyethylene is like that chain link fence.

 

"That's what we can do. Fragmenting -- without producing a lot of secondary radiation -- is actually where the battle is won or lost," Barghouty says.

 

Made to order

Despite their shielding power, ordinary trash bags obviously won't do for building a spaceship. So Barghouty and his colleagues have been trying to beef-up polyethylene for aerospace work.

 

That's how Shielding Project researcher Raj Kaul, working together with Barghouty, came to invent RXF1. RXF1 is remarkably strong and light: it has 3 times the tensile strength of aluminum, yet is 2.6 times lighter -- impressive even by aerospace standards.

 

righthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/Raj_Kaul_thumb.jpg[/img]"Since it is a ballistic shield, it also deflects micrometeorites," says Kaul, who had previously worked with similar materials in developing helicopter armor. "Since it's a fabric, it can be draped around molds and shaped into specific spacecraft components." And because it's derived from polyethylene, it's an excellent radiation shield as well.

 

The specifics of how RXF1 is made are secret because a patent on the material is pending.

 

Strength is only one of the traits that the walls of a spaceship must have, Barghouty notes. Flammability and temperature tolerance are also important: It doesn't matter how strong a spaceship's walls are if they melt in direct sunlight or catch fire easily. Pure polyethylene is very flammable. More work is needed to customize RXF1 even further to make it flame and temperature resistant as well, Barghouty says.

 

The Bottom Line

The big question, of course, is the bottom line: Can RXF1 carry humans safely to Mars? At this point, no one knows for sure.

 

Some "galactic cosmic rays are so energetic that no reasonable amount of shielding can stop them," cautions Frank Cucinotta, NASA's Chief Radiation Health Officer. "All materials have this problem, including polyethylene."

 

Cucinotta and colleagues have done computer simulations to compare the cancer risk of going to Mars in an aluminum ship vs. a polyethylene ship. Surprisingly, "there was no significant difference," he says. This conclusion depends on a biological model which estimates how human tissue is affected by space radiation--and therein lies the rub. After decades of spaceflight, scientists still don't fully understand how the human body reacts to cosmic rays. If their model is correct, however, there could be little practical benefit to the extra shielding polyethylene provides. This is a matter of ongoing research.

 

Because of the many uncertainties, dose limits for astronauts on a Mars mission have not been set, notes Barghouty. But assuming that those dose limits are similar to limits set for Shuttle and Space Station flights, he believes RXF1 could hypothetically provide adequate shielding for a 30 month mission to Mars.

 

Today, to the dump. Tomorrow, to the stars? Polyethylene might take you farther than you ever imagined.

 

Source: [email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really enjoyed this article C1ay, this is what I call thinking out of the box. At least for me it seemed like a revolutionary idea. Even if the trip to Mars needs to be put off for a while, this material may come into popular use with our current space missions. Considering that this plastic is so much lighter, launching vehicles into orbit would become a much easier task.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to wonder, by this logic, why the lighter metals aren't considered? Lithium plates would do a great job as radiation armour, by the logic of this arguement. Strength matters very little in reality in space - you hit a big thing, you die, you hit a lot of small things at great speed, you die. You patch small holes as they happen. And they aren't going to get wet if you wrap them in this polythene beforehand, and deep sapce is quite dry, just like Mars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

last step is creating a viable magnetic field for deflecting those higher energy field. sheild technology is well on its way.

 

sci-fi says superconducting magnetic coils are the answer, but we've yet to find a way to create universal magnetism (magnetism beyond the electron, gravity, something that also acts on the static non charged objects (perhaps charging them without adversly affecting their nature), a superconducting magnetic coil, a directional gravity field generator. a side benefit would be antigravity. if we can create such a gravity coil we can solve dozens of problems. namely gravity on a spaceship not based on centripetal force but opposing feild coils inside/below/within deck plating (pulling down on one side and neutral on the other lest one is to sit on the ceiling).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strength matters very little in reality in space - you hit a big thing, you die, you hit a lot of small things at great speed, you die.

 

A space ship is exposed to incredible forces during launch and landing - and also when doing orbit insertions etc. They need to be extremely strong indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

possibly simply because they could insulate heat and not become rigid and brittle from the cold of space, they would however like the metals melt at some high temperature, mixing in some heat resistant materials like ceramics or carbon could provide heat resistance while conserving the remarkable weight saving vs metals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...