Southtown Posted December 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 6, 2009 Perpetual acceleration toward causality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 Perpetual acceleration of complexity, from the infinite to the infinitesimal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 In a sea of potential, relative areas of entropy become nodes (entities) in a matrix of reciprocity, and causality becomes relative to interaction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 The orthogonal axis of in/out expanding by infinite multiplicity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 relative outer vacuum, relative inner complexity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 complexity times complexity is manifest as increased quantization vector toward interaction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 I don't think I'm getting any traffic. Cuz I sure as hell know you guys can shut me down, or ask the right questions, at least to make me think. I've acquired a taste for sharp critizism. Please... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 One theory is the reciprocal of the other, and reality is perspective. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 7, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 Which theory you ask? Why, the only 'other' certainty is 'anti' certainty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snoopdogg Posted December 7, 2009 Report Share Posted December 7, 2009 It’s not perspective your searching for, it is perception. Energy, Space and Time, do not co-exist or interact with each other, they are all simply the same thing. Perspective comes from viewing things from different origins; however perception is the ability to view things all together. Southtown 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Quantization is the aftermath of entropy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 It’s not perspective your searching for, it is perception. Energy, Space and Time, do not co-exist or interact with each other, they are all simply the same thing.You may be right. lol Actually, I would say that they all appear simultaneous from any singular frame of reference. Perspective comes from viewing things from different origins; however perception is the ability to view things all together.All interaction happens between and amongst disparate frames of reference. ...even within the entities. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Quantization exists as imperceptible past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 Perceptible violation of continuity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted December 30, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 If only I hadn't looked... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawcat Posted December 30, 2009 Report Share Posted December 30, 2009 nothing can be fully described which is not described in terms of birth and death, or coming into (relative) existence and out.ST Well, there is an exception. I can fully describe the bottle on my table without knowing anything about is birth or death. I can fully describe my hair without knowing its birth or death. I can fully describe assets, liabilities and profits of a company without knowing its birth or death. Snapshots in time describe things fully without any need for knowing birth or death.Conversely, I may not know anything about something if I only have information about its birth or death.Now, if you want to say: no life can be fully described withoutif not described in terms of birth and death; then I may agree. If theory of eventuality is a theory of events, and if events are durations, and if durations describe life, and if life must contain birth and death, then eventuality rests on birth and death. Southtown 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southtown Posted January 4, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 4, 2010 Well, there is an exception. I can fully describe the bottle on my table without knowing anything about is birth or death. I can fully describe my hair without knowing its birth or death. I can fully describe assets, liabilities and profits of a company without knowing its birth or death. Snapshots in time describe things fully without any need for knowing birth or death.Conversely, I may not know anything about something if I only have information about its birth or death.Now, if you want to say: no life can be fully described withoutif not described in terms of birth and death; then I may agree.Well there is an exception ... lol Being perceived and being described are precisely two separate things (practically reciprocal ... relatively speaking.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.