Jump to content
Science Forums

Agricultural recycling


Ganoderma

Recommended Posts

before thinking big, i am thinking we could put our heads together for some processes that will elimate waste and focus it into something useful, but start small in a garden setting.

 

i see food production (plant) as we only take one thing out....corn (seed), potato (root), lettuce (leaves) etc.

 

there is a lot of waste that is often thrown out or burned (yuck!).

 

so we have this big plant,lets take corn for a second. we got a few cobs of corn off it but we now have a fairly woody stem, a bunch of leaves and the roots. i see a lot of locked up energy in there that is jsut going to be "wasted".

 

 

what i aim for is some kind of system, lets think of something, that takes up around 10% or less of teh growing space and turns green energy (waste material of plants) into brown energy (compost? fertilizer, soil additives).

 

i am thinking for now not concern about climate etc, work on that later. but for focus on trying to convert waste material into soil/poo or whatever that can be thrown back out into the field....doesn't even have to be good nutrition, just not bad....add to the soil at the very least. the goal is to stop wasting and burning, and reuse it in the garden/farm.....without attracting pests. and hopefully in a timely fashion without large surface area requirements.

 

 

leaves seem rather easily taken care of as they are eaten up by animals and fungus fast. but the cellulose heavy things like stems and roots (very hard) are often slow to break down. i have played a bit with mushrooms to break down these parts faster, but was a little disappointed in the final result (still rather woody and takes a long time for other organisms (bug) to break down further).

 

my personal belief is that if a system like this can eventually be refined to little space, fast turnover and efficiency, than self sustained agriculture that is lighter on the planet is probably an easy task.

 

thoughts?

 

 

 

some random links sort of related.

recycling wood

http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/library/frbc1996/FRBC1996MR19.pdf

 

National Compost Trials: British Columbia Use of Organic Composts in Horticultural Production Systems

Composting Council of Canada

 

 

basic gardener type thing

http://www.westchestergov.com/pdfs/ENVFACIL_BackyardComposting.pdf

 

Compost Microorganisms

Compost Microorganisms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

before thinking big, i am thinking we could put our heads together for some processes that will elimate waste and focus it into something useful, but start small in a garden setting.

...

leaves seem rather easily taken care of as they are eaten up by animals and fungus fast. but the cellulose heavy things like stems and roots (very hard) are often slow to break down. i have played a bit with mushrooms to break down these parts faster, but was a little disappointed in the final result (still rather woody and takes a long time for other organisms (bug) to break down further).

 

thoughts?

 

This is my first year with corn, and I have the stalks laid on the bare garden soil to start composting and control erosion. Tough stuff aright. The root balls and lower stems of my sunflowers, which I have grown several years, also don't break down very fast. Nonetheless, I don't care to pay for the yard debris service so it is all still in the "takes-long-to-break-down-pile", which I keep separate from several smaller compost piles I use for the leafy goods from the garden and yard.

 

My thought at the moment is to grind it up before composting. :doh: That's another cost for a machine, cost to run it, pollution if it's gas driven, and maybe not enough oomph if it's electric. Not sure what's on the market, just throwing out the idea. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, that is certainly a good idea, and it is done a lot. there was a place where i lived in canada that turned wood debris (fallen trees, pruned trees etc) into soil within 4 weeks. it used a few things, mostly grinding and heat....but like you say its using a lot of energy itself, which i want to avoid when possible.

 

i am trying to setup an experiment with oyster mushrooms and chopsticks (bamboo) and see how much it actually breaks down in XX days, by volume and dry weight. but that takes time, so after christmas.

 

i was thinking that a multi processed unit would be a must. for example, first you need to dry it (that takes up a lot of space), but once dried i was thinking perhaps a mushroom culture (good money in that as well), then when they are spent try that parabolic trough (sp?) that you posted a while ago, but on a big scale. grinding may be the best option i think, which means energy used....perhaps solar is enough to power, not sure....a wood grinder just sounds expensive, so i have not looked into it lol. for my experiments out kitchen blender gets good use;)

 

What are some things that are known to break down cell structures in a big way?

heat

UV

freezing (best done while plants are still green)

mechanically crushing/grinding

 

more ideas?

 

 

another link for a little more info

http://www.davidsuzuki.org/files/dos_donts1_rev1_(2).pdf

 

 

WOW! this is really cool!

Beetles That Break Down Wood Might Provide Key to Biofuel Research - Renewable Energy World

"This fungus has genes that then make enzymes," explained Hoover, whose team's findings appeared in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "We have been able to detect messages from the [fungal] DNA, which get translated into enzymes."

 

i should ask the kids to bring home some asian long horns to play with B)

 

 

 

http://www.fungifun.org/mushworld/Oyster-Mushroom-Cultivation/mushroom-growers-handbook-1-mushworld-com-chapter-5-6.pdf

 

http://www.pjbs.org/pjnonline/fin196.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

While I love composting, when we are talking about more stubborn agriwaste and even waste timber, I've got a much faster system that can even turn some cardboards and other materials into both a soil enchancement AND some biofuels. Chuck it all in a biochar cooker.

 

EVERY local government area should turn all their biowaste into a local biochar cooker, if for no other reason than they could generate enough fuel to run their fleet of trucks.

 

Helps solve global warming, improves the soil EXTREMELY quickly, reduces water and nutrient loss from the soil, adds a "coral reef of the soil" for microorganisms and fungi to grow in which in turn sequesters heaps of Co2 into the soil, and finally... produces some VITAL liquid fuels. Even though oil has crashed under $40 USA this situation will not last. The geology of oil production has not changed, and we will be facing oil shortages within the decade.

 

For more on Biochar see this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that thought crossed my mind as well. what kind of system do you propose?

 

i have also just realized the huge amount of post harvest pine apples, which have NO use it seems, they just dry and burn the plants.

 

i am wondering if there is perhaps a way of making a portable or mobile system of this "biochar" cooker, one that can be taken farm to farm....because lets face it, hauling millions of truckloads of agriwaste is just not realistic.

 

edit. i have been reading a bit now and found this neat bit.

 

http://www.biochar-international.org/projectsandprograms/memberprojects.html

Josh Frye raises a lot of chickens in his poultry operation – as many as 800,000 birds a year. A lot of chickens means a lot of chicken poop to dispose of, along with a lot of propane to keep the chicks warm in the winter - on the order of 30,000 gallons a year. So when a buddy of his, Matt Harper, suggested they take a road trip to Illinois to see a gasifier that would turn poop into heat, Josh was very interested.

 

i guess i should also mention my wifes parents own a large pig farm, so should the right things come along, i have quite a lot of crap to play with :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry I missed this last week....

While I love composting....

Helps solve global warming, improves the soil EXTREMELY quickly, reduces water and nutrient loss from the soil, adds a "coral reef of the soil" for microorganisms and fungi to grow in which in turn sequesters heaps of Co2 into the soil, and finally... produces some VITAL liquid fuels.

 

googled: "coral reef of the soil"

 

Hey! I just googled this and it seems this is a phrase you coined!

 

I think it is very descriptive and easily lends a very intuitive grasp of the potential for biochar.

 

I'm going to start using that phrase when I try to explain biochar to folks.

...if that's okay? :hyper:

===

 

...of course now I'm suspecting that the real coral reefs are probably releasing a lot of CO2 as they bleach.

...all the more reason to build up our terrestrial "coral reefs." :)

 

~ ;)

 

p.s. ...and great idea. I think the mobile pyrolysis units have a lot of potential!!!

...except where trash trucks can ferry stuff to a central location.... :shrug:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just read this (i gotta go to work i 20 mins :):(;):()

 

http://www.biochar-international.org/images/Flier_2.2_production.pdf

Gasification and pyrolysis production systems can be developed

as mobile or stationary units. Small scale gasification and pyrolysis

systems that can be used on farm or by small industries are

commercially available with biomass inputs of 50 kg/hr to 1,000

kg/hr. At the local or regional level, pyrolysis and gasification units

can be operated by co-operatives or larger industries, and have

processed up to 8,000 kg of biomass per hour.

 

8,000 KG/HR is quite frankly an incredibly impressive number. but it doesn't give other figures about that system like how big it is.

 

i also think that 50kg/hr for a portable unit is quite fair. setup up a unit at a farm for a day or 2, let them dispose of all their gunk, and move down the road to the next farm....sounds pretty sweet to me! but i am having trouble finding the general concept of how this works and how to build one (the ones for sale are REALLY expensive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

i guess my jars of mold i have growing are not really that useful as i originally though LOL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

One thing I think is missing in the "environmental" approach to agriculture is the value of crop wastes. Do a search for the nutrient value of hay removed from grasslands, as these are the most documented effects of total crop removal from the local environment. The notion that you can remove all of the biomass created in a season without detrimental effect on the soil health is flat out wrong.

 

Hard to decompose products like corn stalks and stover can be reintroduced to the soil after composting, but this is relatively expensive. A more efficient way is to use this material as supplemental feed to livestock, and to reincorporate their waste back into the field crops. There are of course many variables in this approach, and no one solution fits all applications.

 

Ultimately, I think the notion that effective cropland management without livestock is flawed at its root, and trying to maintain a nutrient recycling regimine without livestock is economically inefficient. There are, however, instances of people using no animals and animal wastes to produce a wide range of plant products, but I'm not convinced of their large scale reliability. That may very well be an inappropriate view on my part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nah, this knowledge is all over the sustainability world. It's just big business doesn't necessarily recognise the longer term costs but even big agricultural players are starting to realise they need to change their ways.

 

Anyway, we are going to be forced to because we are slowly running out of phosphorus.

Agriculture

 

Peak phosphorus: readings | Energy Bulletin

 

But you make a good point about integrating cattle. Check out Cam McKellar's Australian experimentation.

Landline - 10/10/2004: Biological farmers look back to the future . Australian Broadcasting Corp

 

Then google the book "The Omnivore's dilemma" which suggests other ways to incorporate cattle into a crop farm for a few years, and then you can grow crops there for a few years. It's about intelligently switching markets, but how this works out in practice in an economy is another question. Could it be that individual farms have to get together to co-ordinate who is going to grow what? Communities co-ordinating this way? Or are massive agribusinesses going to corner this method first, simply because they have the money to invest in switching one farm to "growing cows" (as they say here in Australia) and another to growing crops?... and then back again after a few years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even hard to decompose products are good for the soil. It adds air gaps in the soil that are beneficial to a good root system. Over time they will slowly decompose. That is why bark mulch is often added to potting soils. It is not there for nutrients, but aeration. It makes it harder to compact the soil and helps the soil retain water. But as time goes on, it also breaks down to add soil amenities.

 

One approach, that is not often used, is to find the fastest growing plants that can grow on the worse land. These are often weeds. We might be able to compost this material, if we can kill the seeds, and use the weed compost, to enrich other soil that is used for food crops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was thinking of that as well Hydrogenbond. I have looked into a few and found that Desmanthus (illinoensis) seems like a good candidate for this. it grows really fast, and is a legume (nitrogen fixing) so is good for soils. one problem i find with many recovery/crop rotation plants is they are generally fairly woody in the stem/roots....hard to decompose...if your worried about that aspect. like you say, its good to have chunks in there. last year i experimented with woody stems in soils and found it attracted a fair bit of pest animal species (namely slugs/snails).

 

i have not tried larger animals, but animals certainly have a place. so far i have only experimented with caterpillars, snails, worms and various insect species. results were not good enough. larger animals like pigs/goats/cows etc could be useful BUT pigs, for example, dont digest wood.... cows/goats seem better with cellulose containing things (grass), but sill i find it not that great.

 

one thing i have been wanting to experiment with (i know i talk a lot about it here) is using mushrooms to break down the wood. the application to real life seems hard, but on paper i found it to be a pretty effective use of things.

 

basically i was thinking have your plant waste divided in two (or more) groups. leafy and woody. make the woody into mushroom crops (sell/eat/compost the fruiting fungus). use the leafy bits as food for higher animals. take left over (spent) mushroom waste (mushroom manure) and give it to various decomposing insects/worms etc (make your choices). take the good leafy waste from earlier, and take the feeder insects/worms and mix them together for a fish feed. i am thinking aquaculture here. the left over water, animal waste and excess mushroom manure can all be put back out into the fields.

 

thoughts on that? i realize cost is high, and realistic application has many problems....but it seems, to me, to be fairly efficient as far as waste management goes.

 

the above posts on a composter that you can wheel to the farm seems much more feasible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biochar can be formed from most organic wastes, cooked up to produce fuel and the miraculous Biochar which permanently sequesters Co2 in the soil, and then it:

* Makes the soil more efficient with water

* Minimises nutrient loss

* Encourages nitrogen fixing microfungi to grow in the soil, multiplying both the Co2 stored in the soil and the micro-organisms in the soil.

* Returns the soil to a healthy ecosystem.

 

Biochar is then added to a mix of chicken manure and other goodies that you composting types already know about and the results are quite miraculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ya, they are quite amazing. but there is still probably need for animals at some point in the cycle....whether the tiny fellas in the soil are enough, or the bigger hogs are needed, i am not sure.

 

you got me reading into the biochar more seriously, but it just seems to me that it would still leave soils lacking various things, if the only system used was that. chicken poop and that seem like a good mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ya, they are quite amazing. but there is still probably need for animals at some point in the cycle....whether the tiny fellas in the soil are enough, or the bigger hogs are needed, i am not sure.

 

you got me reading into the biochar more seriously, but it just seems to me that it would still leave soils lacking various things, if the only system used was that. chicken poop and that seem like a good mix.

 

Absolutely!

 

Just adding char to dirt will not make rich soil (even if it is chicken-activated char).

 

Lots more organic matter needs to be added, just like the regular soil amendment process.

Bolstered in many ways by the char--as Eclipse shows, the beasties then turn that into rich soil; more quickly and more efficiently than would happen without the fascilitated beasties--and a soil more bio-available to the plants--than would happen with an "un-charred" soil.

 

...or words to that effect, I think. Does that make sense?

 

...gotta run.

~ ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spot on Essay! :naughty:

 

Soil is a mixture of 'stuff'. An imbalance in any direction can create problems.

 

Ganoderma, I too believe that mushrooms/fungi are the key to breaking down 'stubborn' material. I'm very much interested in your trials! The climate here in Georgia is significantly different than Taiwan, but fungi plays the same role everywhere.

 

It would be interesting to see results from an experiment that involved a culmination of smashed woody debris and char added to a native soil. It would be a difficult experiment in terms of quantifying input and output, but it would yield, imho, very interesting results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a layer of aged wood chips (about four inches thick) in pathways between vegetable beds to prevent erosion, water evaporation, and for weed control. Some years ago, I seeded the pathways with Stropharia rugosoannulata (also known as garden giant, wine cap stropharia, and many other common names). I also use a six inch layer of straw mulch over the beds themselves, and I do not till. After a year, I found mycelium filaments throughout both the pathways and the beds themselves. I get mushroom caps in shaded areas in the spring and fall, and by winter time, I remove the top layer of wood chips from the pathways and dig out a nice inch layer of decomposed peat-like substrate that I mix with redworm castings to make container soil, if needed. Otherwise, I just place it on top of the beds under a new straw layer. Then I replace the left over wood chips, and add more wood chips to bring it back up to four inches.

 

I learned about Stropharia rugosoannulata from Growing Gourmet and Medicinal Mushrooms by Paul Stamets in which he claims this fungus in a wood chip bed is capable of filtering bacteria from manure laden run-off water. I have not tried it on a pile of wood chips removed from the garden, as I have always assumed the runoff and leaching of nutrient rich water from the garden was helping the fungus. It is however, a far more forgiving fungus than most, and it survives both the few cold snaps here in the winter and the unbearable summer heat.

 

I do not use corn stalks, cobs, tomato vines, and other woody vegetable garden waste in the compost pile, I just feed them to the neighbors cows, and grab a small amount of manure in return. The majority of my compost is made from horse manure that I receive for free (if you don't count labor to remove it from the stalls). This is also the source of my straw, as horses are generally fed a higher quality hay than other animals, and are just as sloppy, so waste hay is common in the stalls. The owner of the stalls used to burn this straw twice a year. The wood chips I get for free from a local landscaping company.

 

I have not yet tried biochar, and I don't need it in my current gardens, but I am toying with the idea of starting a test plot with biochar soon. Tilling wood chips into native soil usually is not recommended, unless you plan on a higher than normal nitrogen fertilizer regimine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason biochar works so well is that it creates all that fungi and micro-organisms... it acts like a "coral reef of the soil".

 

Eclipse Now: Replenish the soil

 

I even read that in the Amazon, where it was practiced for thousands of years, the locals know to use the terra-preta soils as a fertiliser and yet leave the last third of it always! The biochar activated soil is so rich in nutrients and organic life that if it is left there, and forest matter falls on top, come back in a few years and much of that life has moved up into the new matter and soil, 'recharging itself' so to speak.

 

Did I already say to watch ABC's Catalyst on Biochar? Moving fast... sorry if I'm repeating myself... gotta run somewhere else....

Catalyst: Agrichar – A solution to global warming? - ABC TV Science

 

...because in another forum "Someone on the internet is wrong!" :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...