Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Research Indicates A Spherical Universe


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3093 posts

Posted 05 November 2019 - 09:48 AM

https://newscienti.s...6wq0N6hltekceDs



This new evidence is in contrast to a flat universe, it seems we could be looking at a new revolution which models a universe more like a ball with an almost even distribution of matter. This could simplify cosmology in several ways.

Edited by Dubbelosix, 05 November 2019 - 09:48 AM.


#2 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 05 November 2019 - 12:02 PM

I would have told you that simply by the fact that there is a particle horizon, there must be a sort of discrepancy in Planck metrics. Or you could say the universe has a particular age which is not supported by observation as of late.

However, there's a difference between a curved universe and a closed universe. I do have a model ya know, you don't loop back to the other side of the universe in it.

Edited by OverUnityDeviceUAP, 05 November 2019 - 12:08 PM.


#3 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3093 posts

Posted 05 November 2019 - 12:10 PM

Told me what exactly? I don't need to come to you for anything. Besides, I have always stated that homogeneity could be an illusion. Or just simply wrong.

#4 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 05 November 2019 - 12:25 PM

Told me what exactly? I don't need to come to you for anything. Besides, I have always stated that homogeneity could be an illusion. Or just simply wrong.

That evidence suggests the universe is not flat...rather simply than what is used in your article, by the fact that light that reaches us has a cutoff point and we dont see an infinite universe without a "particle horizon", I would say it was a matter of common sense.

#5 GAHD

GAHD

    Eldritch Horror

  • Administrators
  • 2713 posts

Posted 05 November 2019 - 04:25 PM

That evidence suggests the universe is not flat...rather simply than what is used in your article, by the fact that light that reaches us has a cutoff point and we dont see an infinite universe without a "particle horizon", I would say it was a matter of common sense.

You obviously have no idea what flat vs (+/-)curved means in this context... You're talking a temporal thing, which has no bearing on overall curvature. The CMBR horizon's existence doesn't tend towards any of the edges of the gauge.



#6 OverUnityDeviceUAP

OverUnityDeviceUAP

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 223 posts

Posted 05 November 2019 - 04:33 PM

You obviously have no idea what flat vs (+/-)curved means in this context... You're talking a temporal thing,

You misunderstand, and even if you understood what I meant you should know that space and time are apart of the same object so it again applies to the horizon, a word which I even used.

How can "discrepancy in a Planck metric" even apply to anything other than length or volume planck units??? Lol. The issue is that space beyond an horizon is not sending light at us.

Anyway, I think of our vacuum and our c as more of a body of land in an ocean of different altogether higher than radio vacuum density so I don't like a curved universe although there being different vacuum densities or wavelengths out of the spectrum like quantum tunneling.

Edited by OverUnityDeviceUAP, 05 November 2019 - 04:51 PM.