Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

The Theory of Eventuality


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#35 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 05 December 2009 - 11:40 PM

Perpetual acceleration toward causality.

#36 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 06 December 2009 - 10:50 PM

Perpetual acceleration of complexity, from the infinite to the infinitesimal.

#37 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 06 December 2009 - 10:52 PM

In a sea of potential, relative areas of entropy become nodes (entities) in a matrix of reciprocity, and causality becomes relative to interaction.

#38 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 06 December 2009 - 10:54 PM

The orthogonal axis of in/out expanding by infinite multiplicity.

#39 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 06 December 2009 - 10:55 PM

relative outer vacuum, relative inner complexity.

#40 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 06 December 2009 - 10:57 PM

complexity times complexity is manifest as increased quantization vector toward interaction

#41 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 06 December 2009 - 11:01 PM

I don't think I'm getting any traffic. Cuz I sure as hell know you guys can shut me down, or ask the right questions, at least to make me think. I've acquired a taste for sharp critizism. Please...

#42 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 06 December 2009 - 11:14 PM

One theory is the reciprocal of the other, and reality is perspective.

#43 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 06 December 2009 - 11:15 PM

Which theory you ask? Why, the only 'other' certainty is 'anti' certainty.

#44 snoopdogg

snoopdogg

    Thinking

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts

Posted 07 December 2009 - 12:50 PM

It’s not perspective your searching for, it is perception. Energy, Space and Time, do not co-exist or interact with each other, they are all simply the same thing. Perspective comes from viewing things from different origins; however perception is the ability to view things all together.
  • Southtown likes this

#45 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 29 December 2009 - 10:11 PM

Quantization is the aftermath of entropy.

#46 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 29 December 2009 - 10:19 PM

It’s not perspective your searching for, it is perception. Energy, Space and Time, do not co-exist or interact with each other, they are all simply the same thing.

You may be right. lol

Actually, I would say that they all appear simultaneous from any singular frame of reference.

Perspective comes from viewing things from different origins; however perception is the ability to view things all together.

All interaction happens between and amongst disparate frames of reference.

...even within the entities.

#47 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 29 December 2009 - 11:13 PM

Quantization exists as imperceptible past.

#48 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 29 December 2009 - 11:14 PM

Perceptible violation of continuity.

#49 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 29 December 2009 - 11:15 PM

If only I hadn't looked...

#50 lawcat

lawcat

    Explaining

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 768 posts

Posted 30 December 2009 - 03:28 AM

nothing can be fully described which is not described in terms of birth and death, or coming into (relative) existence and out.
ST


Well, there is an exception. I can fully describe the bottle on my table without knowing anything about is birth or death. I can fully describe my hair without knowing its birth or death. I can fully describe assets, liabilities and profits of a company without knowing its birth or death. Snapshots in time describe things fully without any need for knowing birth or death.
Conversely, I may not know anything about something if I only have information about its birth or death.
Now, if you want to say: no life can be fully described withoutif not described in terms of birth and death; then I may agree.

If theory of eventuality is a theory of events, and if events are durations, and if durations describe life, and if life must contain birth and death, then eventuality rests on birth and death.
  • Southtown likes this

#51 Southtown

Southtown

    differentiating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1922 posts

Posted 03 January 2010 - 11:07 PM

Well, there is an exception. I can fully describe the bottle on my table without knowing anything about is birth or death. I can fully describe my hair without knowing its birth or death. I can fully describe assets, liabilities and profits of a company without knowing its birth or death. Snapshots in time describe things fully without any need for knowing birth or death.
Conversely, I may not know anything about something if I only have information about its birth or death.
Now, if you want to say: no life can be fully described withoutif not described in terms of birth and death; then I may agree.

Well there is an exception ... lol Being perceived and being described are precisely two separate things (practically reciprocal ... relatively speaking.)