The mass value is one when?

[Diamonds]

Is there an Universal mass that represents value 1 or one. If there is such a mass it must be one of the particles that exists and are known to us. 

An Electron is the first particle that occurs in my mind.  But its mass is 0.511 not one. But why not to think then that Two different electrons are allways joined together many ways and TWO Electrons are the universal mass representing as value 1 or one. 

E = mc^2 

m = 1 = 2 electrons

m = 1/2 = 1 electron

How can two separate particles that neglect each other be considered as to create this universal mass which value is as one.

Has the nature made it impossible that there ever exists the mass which value is exactly as one.

Are there ways that two electrons belongs together somehow? This I must find out first. 

Entanglement, spin ????? 

Now this idea may be a ridiculous but anyway I feel need to find out if any mass can be considered as being in all cases one in E = mc^2.

Of course if you feel that any 1 kg mass will do then do not answer pointing out that. It is not what I am seeking. 

 

 

[OceanBreeze]

22 hours ago, Diamonds said:

Is there an Universal mass that represents value 1 or one. If there is such a mass it must be one of the particles that exists and are known to us.

No, to your question but there is something even better!

Max Planck introduced what became later known as the Planck constant. At the end of the paper, he proposed the base units that were later named in his honor. The Planck units are based on the quantum of action, now usually known as the Planck constant, which appeared in the Wien approximation for black-body radiation. Planck underlined the universality of the new unit system, writing:

...” it is possible to set up units for length, mass, time and temperature, which are independent of special bodies or substances, necessarily retaining their meaning for all times and for all civilizations, including extraterrestrial and non-human ones, which can be called "natural units of measure".

While the values of Planck units are not 1, they are based only on the universal constants G , h, c and kB His definitions differ from the modern ones by a factor of 2 π because the modern definitions use ℏ [hbar ] rather than h .

I believe this is as close as you will come to finding a Universal Mass, as well as a Universal length, and many other Universal Units. Although their values are not One, they possess even more remarkable traits!

Since the Planck units are defined exclusively in terms of four universal physical constants: c, G, ħ, and kB; Expressing one of these four physical constants in terms of Planck units yields a numerical value of 1.

They are a system of natural units, defined using fundamental properties of nature (specifically, properties of free space) rather than properties of a chosen prototype object. Originally proposed in 1899 by German physicist Max Planck, they are relevant in research on unified theories such as quantum gravity.

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units

[Diamonds]

I am not sure if this mystery in mathematics that I happened accidentally to find has something to do with this thread?

Yang-Mills existence and mass gap

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang–Mills_existence_and_mass_gap

 

[Diamonds]

Here is a little bit of text from that article:

In quantum field theory, the mass gap is the difference in energy between the vacuum and the next lowest energy state. The energy of the vacuum is zero by definition, and assuming that all energy states can be thought of as particles in plane-waves, the mass gap is the mass of the lightest particle

The main article concerning that is MASS GAP.

 

 

[Diamonds]

This too occurred in my mind:

Numbers and constants having endless amount of decimals for instance pii, c, 1/3, 2/3 are actually more precisce than numbers like 3, 30, 300 and so on. 

They are unique in values and foundations to everything. 

If there are objects with speed then the speed must be unique and c and pii and 1/3 are just that. If the speed is 30 km/s that is not an unique speed but .....

I can not with my lousy english give you more philosophy of that. There are more but I can't explain it. 

Between 3 to 30 there are infinite amount of numbers but only one of them is pii. That is why pii is Exact number but 3 is not. Pii is unique. 

It is not coincidence that Quark has charges like 1/3 and 2/3. They just are even more exact than 2/5 =0.4 or 2 would be. Unique value is more exact than any other value. 

 

 

[Diamonds]

If spaceship moves at the speed of 4 km/s that is not its exact speed ever. 

But if spaceship moves 3.1415926..... km/s that is its very exact speed. 

An Electron in its orbit must always move at unique ie exact speed for instance 2234 2/3 km per second but it can never move at the speed that is not exact for instance 2234 2/5 km per second. 

This may have something to do with quantum mechanics? No speed and place is known at the same time?

 

 

[Diamonds]

Are we living in the simulation?

If an Electrons speed must all the time be an exact speed and values like 1/4 and 1/5 and 2/5 are not allowed .. ..

All moving objects in the universe must have an unique speed. For instace photons = c 299792.458....

Never is there allowed speeds that are not unique , speeds like 250000, 2000, 100 and so on. 

If objects speed happen to get near 100 there must be some way to prevent that. Speed can not be but of an unique value.