Jump to content
Science Forums

P-forms


sanctus

Recommended Posts

No, a p-form takes p vectors as arguments and, I seem to remember (sheeeeeeesh 'twas a good while ago!) it is by definition antisymmetric for exchange of any two of them:

 

[math]F(v_1, v_2, v_3, v_4...) = -F(v_1, v_3, v_2, v_4...)[/math]

 

Therefore, if your manifold is n dimensional (4, perhaps?) then you could say it's like a function [math]\norm f:\, \Re^{np} \rightarrow\, \Re[/math]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your welcome Sanctus.

 

Well, Alon, it has been creeping "downward" if you know what I mean. When I took it, yes, it was a Ph. D. course shared with the degree ones so I was able to choose it as a fourth year course. Another such course I took was field theory based on functional methods and including QCD, the recomended textbook was Ramond.

 

In past decades quantum mechanics was "usually" a Ph. D. course but it has long been compulsory in the third year, just like special relativity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nowadays SR, is the first course with classical mechanics in your first year in physics.

i take physics and maths in my uni, but for those who take only physics can choose to take intro to general realtivity, i guess it just covers tidbit of this extraordinary theory, ill try squeezing someday intro to GR if i can. (but the schedule is already tight, i think it would be shame to have a bsc in physics and maths but not having done any course on GR).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alon, I'm now donig my last semester before finishing the courses for the master in physics, after I've got the paper to write (no idea of how you call it in english).

The GR course depends on two things here:

1) because we are not many students it is given only every two years (so there is people doing the bachelor who follow it as well);

2) The prof who gives it is very theoretical (without many intuitive examples), so this scared off quite a few people and makes the course interesting only for those interested in theoretical physics.

 

By the way what is a good book also with the modern approach to GR (I mean as well with the Cartan calculus)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...