Building A Quantum Computer Discuss

[JeffreysTubes8]

Again, it's hormonal. It's not due to some profound notion and awareness of one's own mortality, although aging would have been so for hominoid species when becoming more ingenuitive.

[Vmedvil2]

1 minute ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

Those long-lived animals wouldn't have been as competitive. Have you ever seen Alien? The more aggressive life-forms are more lethal. You wouldn't be in so much of a hurry to challenge an alpha male if you had forever to do so.

That makes sense plus wouldn't there be more competition for food and other resources if you lived longer due to a larger population.

[Vmedvil2]

2 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

Again, it's hormonal. It's not due to some profound notion and awareness of one's own mortality, although aging would have been so for hominoid species when becoming more ingenuitive.

Well I get it is a chemical process and not a conscious process of arising from intelligence of the brain for most species.

Edited August 25, 2021 by VictorMedvil

[JeffreysTubes8]

1 minute ago, VictorMedvil said:

That makes sense plus wouldn't there be more competition for food and other resources if you lived longer due to a larger population.

Living longer=/=larger population. Being higher on the food-chain does.

[Vmedvil2]

5 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

 

I'm more interested to know what your thoughts are on this ingenuitive approach. And it's more on-topic.

You won't see this solution on any of Von Neumann or Freeman Dyson's ideas.

 

You have the same issue that I do in the respect with my Dark Energy warp drive(https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/30754-warp-field-structure-and-warp-drive/), how are you going to concentrate and make your dark energy flow in a linear direction, dark energy effects every point of space equally it does not concentrate into certain areas higher than others. Gravitational waves are ripples in time-space they are not dark energy.

 

Edited August 25, 2021 by VictorMedvil

[JeffreysTubes8]

3 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

You have the same issue that I do in the respect with my Dark Energy warp drive(https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/30754-warp-field-structure-and-warp-drive/), how are you going to concentrate and make your dark energy flow in a linear direction, dark energy effects every point of space equally it does not concentrate into certain areas higher than others.

 

No it doesn't effect it equally, even with a pre-ftl computer and a random fling of dark energy the slipstream's gravity will inevitably favor one direction over the others so long as the mini black holes aren't made in the center of the product of the ship's area and volume.

[Vmedvil2]

2 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

No it doesn't effect it equally, even with a pre-ftl computer and a random fling of dark energy the slipstream's gravity will inevitably favor one direction over the others so long as the mini black holes aren't made in the center of the product of the ship's area and volume.

Yes, you could make electrons "Ride" Gravitational waves, however those aren't dark energy they are in the negative curvature direction then back to zero curvature repeating.

Edited August 25, 2021 by VictorMedvil

[Vmedvil2]

1 minute ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

The only issue is you can't predict what direction you'll go in. So as long as you're far enough between stars systems when you do it you should be okay, because even with imperfect carbon nanotubes an x-structure support frame with an endo-exoskeleton infused along the titanium corridors you can take a pounding by ftl macro-particles.

I think that gravitational waves lose intensity the further away you are from the source, depending on the range of the "Ripple" from the source, wouldn't be very noticeable. They certainly at the ranges you are talking about be wouldn't be a high enough of a Negative curvature versus zero curvature displacement to do much.

[Vmedvil2]

Just now, JeffreysTubes8 said:

The only time positive curvature comes into my interpretation is when dealing with quantum entanglement

Well  I am going off of Einstein's Field Equations/General Relativity I cannot speak for what your model predicts.

[Vmedvil2]

4 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

Especially when you get into positive curvatures, because you're replacing timelines, that is not unlike the many worlds interpretation, only one is favored. So you get certainty in the uncertainty principal, you can find the hidden variable because only reality is picked. But yes you need a stronger computer than what we currently, probably stronger than a Jupiter Computer or a Matrioshka brain if you want to find the favored outcome of quantum states.

Well, what I am talking about is the cosmological constant has a + Sign and the Energy-Stress Tensor has a - Sign when you put them on the same side in General Relativity's equations which makes a positive and negative curvature when you take a Riemann curvature of them.

Edited August 25, 2021 by VictorMedvil

[JeffreysTubes8]

32 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

I think that gravitational waves lose intensity the further away you are from the source, depending on the range of the "Ripple" from the source, wouldn't be very noticeable. They certainly at the ranges you are talking about be wouldn't be a high enough of a Negative curvature versus zero curvature displacement to do much.

Yes but the rate of tugs per moment in the wake, or the "field-rate" would be higher. And again it would cover more ground than the baryonic universe which is why there's a Riemann tensor to it exerted on galaxies.

[Vmedvil2]

22 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

No that's direction of angular gravity, that's how you get the Lagrangian of Earth's orbit where they put satellites. Also important to know when the craft enters other earth orbits post-space age.

I understand that it yields how gravity effects movement however that also says that Dark Energy/Cosmological Constant put stress opposite the direction to energy-mass on objects being it is the opposite force as gravity from energy-mass. It's 1/dx^2 is opposite in value to energy-mass's 1/dx^2.

Edited August 25, 2021 by VictorMedvil

[JeffreysTubes8]

40 minutes ago, JeffreysTubes8 said:

But my model includes it in it's definition of dark energy. Sort of, although the dark energy itself doesn't have such curvatures 

Actually there is one, dark energy can become galaxies with their own SMBH, which is why the universe expands faster and faster and faster, at a slower and slower rate as energy is lost to higher darker states. 

Edited August 25, 2021 by JeffreysTubes8

[JeffreysTubes8]

3 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

I understand that it yields how gravity effects movement however that also says that Dark Energy/Cosmological Constant put stress opposite the direction to energy-mass on objects being it is the opposite force as gravity from energy-mass. It's 1/dx^2 is opposite in value to energy-mass's 1/dx^2.

It doesn't explain dark energy,

only in very rare scenarios 

[JeffreysTubes8]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronovisor

[JeffreysTubes8]

Yes you can get Lagrange points that are above neutral, equitably in every direction but that's not what's causing decreasingly accelerating expansion that's a very specific feature of our universe. 

 

[JeffreysTubes8]

On 8/24/2021 at 8:22 PM, VictorMedvil said:

 

But Yes, now I agree with you with a sufficiently advanced computer you could input the laws of physics and simulate the universe at different times and places. That is kinda the idea behind Mind Uploading(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_uploading) too, to make a physically accurate simulation of the brain in a computer, why couldn't that be applied to larger volumes, there is no reason why it couldn't.

This is why they KNOW, know know, that the Technological Singularity will come. The term "Technological Singularity" originated with the Chronovisor. It really did.

It's more Classical than Cyborgs, Androids, or the more recent term "Mind Uploading" classical like how Beethoven or Mozart or Galileo would think of it.

Or the thinking man classical. Not this cyberpunk BS, "stoicism" is the word for the day.

Say you had a simulation, and you wanted to solve a math problem no one on this Earth has solved, somewhere in those vast parallel calculations of the simulation cosmic redundancy dictates other human histories arise in the number, where by random chance a person that never existed on this planet works on the VERY math problem and you can synergize with his approach and use examples of it to boost your own work on the problem.

This is what they mean when they say "artificial intelligence" this is it's true form, it is stoic artificial intelligence or sentient awareness not indigenous to their programming, just indigenous to the simulation they calculate autonomously. You locate these random examples in alternate human histories with a search running program that categorically locates the anomaly based on criteria, that's your cybernetic mind right there. It just pops up in the numbers and can be played in real D or as an animated rendition whatever floats your boat. You can even use video editing software to view it with a musical soundtrack playing in the background.

You can add your own creative license to real moments in real people's lives, and make movies, chop those moments into nonsequential order, make it look like an innocent committed murder and frame them with real video evidence. The possibilities of a Chronovisor to manipulate and deceive on mass scale is stupendous, and the only valid source of information would be the chronovisor itself!

Edited August 26, 2021 by JeffreysTubes8