HouseKnight1

WEAKEN ISRAEL — WORLDWIDE CONSEQUENCES The Left has managed to inflict colossal harm on Israel and the entire West. Today it became known that Saudi Arabia, on which Israel counted in the confrontation with Iran, broke down and bowed to the ayatollahs. A huge global bloc of China, Russia, Iran, Arab, and other OPEC states was formed and directed against the West. This block controls the world’s oil resources, and most of the industry (China), has an advantage in strategic and tactical weapons (Russia). …………… The West is isolated and weak. By betraying Israel, the West shot itself in the foot, tipped the scales in favor of the enemy, and ended up in isolation. Only Netanyahu’s victory in the civil war imposed on us by the Democratic Party and their agents in Israel will make it possible to at least partially restore the global balance of power.

WEAKEN ISRAEL — WORLDWIDE CONSEQUENCES The Left has managed to inflict colossal harm on Israel and the entire West. Today it became known that Saudi Arabia, on which Israel counted in the confrontation with Iran, broke down and bowed to the ayatollahs. A huge global bloc of China, Russia, Iran, Arab, and other OPEC states was formed and directed against the West. This block controls the world’s oil resources, and most of the industry (China), has an advantage in strategic and tactical weapons (Russia). …………… The West is isolated and weak. By betraying Israel, the West shot itself in the foot, tipped the scales in favor of the enemy, and ended up in isolation. Only Netanyahu’s victory in the civil war imposed on us by the Democratic Party and their agents in Israel will make it possible to at least partially restore the global balance of power.

http://aaronblog.co/2022/10/palestine-is-a-knife-in-the-hands-of-antisemites/ The term «anti-Semites» is not an insult, but a scientific definition of certain individuals and entire population groups. I believe that anti-Semitism is the most widespread and influential ideology in the world. It is enough to consider the decisions of the UN, the policy of the European Union, the Islamic Conference, Iran, etc. Palestine found itself at the epicenter of a global anti-Semitic typhoon. A «peaceful Palestine» is not in sight in the coming decades, especially considering how Palestinian children are raised and taught in schools. Therefore, the majority of Israelis oppose the independence and strengthening of the Palestinian state in the center of Israel. An independent Palestine and peace are incompatible. Since the majority of Israelis support peace, we are against an independent Palestine. …………….. The State of Israel was created to protect the Jews from anti-Semitism, but it turned out that in Israel we are also the target of attacks and assassinations. I rightly compared Palestine to a knife that anti-Semites stuck in the heart of Israel. It turned out to be impossible to negotiate with the Palestinians because the anti-Semites inspire and finance the Palestinians’ war for the destruction of Israel.

WHO BROKE THE OSLO AСCORDS …………… The left is counting that the people of Israel have a bad memory. They are wrong. The Oslo Accords provided for the very independence of Palestine as a result of the «final treaty», but the Palestinians thwarted their implementation. At first, they tried to disrupt Oslo with terror, but this was not enough. The assassination of Rabin, whose main instigator was Yasser Arafat, was also not enough. Yes, I contend that Arafat was the main culprit in the murder of Rabin, and this is based on a cardinal fact: Arafat negotiated ostensible peace and at the same time unleashed the most outright terror against the Jewish population. He was especially fond of killing babies. In doing so, he created a violent conflict within Jewish society, more than intentionally. The result was the assassination of Rabin, who called the victims of Palestinian terror «victims of peace.» ARAFAT MURDERED RABIN. Then, due to targeted terror, the Palestinians helped to defeat Peres, brought Netanyahu to power, but this was not enough. Netanyahu continued to abide by the Oslo Accords. It was he who signed the last of the Oslo Accords in 1998. A year later, Netanyahu was eliminated, Ehud Barak won the elections due to foreign money, but this was not enough. Ehud Barak forced Arafat to negotiate at Camp David in 2000, made far-reaching concessions, including the resettlement of 200,000 refugees in Israel, and agreed to divide Jerusalem and move the capital of Palestine there … But every concession of Barak Arafat met with new, more unacceptable demands. The talks were disrupted by Arafat. His wife, Suha, explained that Arafat had made the decision on the Intifada a year before the Camp David talks. Labor leader Barak explained to the people of Israel that Palestine does not want peace. During the Intifada, Arafat urged the West to bomb Israel the way they bombed Serbia. He really expected to destroy Israel during his lifetime. The Palestinians denounced the Oslo Accords, while Israel continues to abide by them to this day. ……………….. After the Intifada, the Palestinians refused all peace proposals. Olmert and Livni fulfilled the promise given to the Arabs and the United States of a unilateral «disengagement», razed to the ground all Jewish villages in Gaza and three more in the West Bank, and withdrew the IDF from Gaza. Despite this, the «partner» Abu Mazen refused to sign any treaty with Israel. Then he was defeated in the parliamentary elections. Hamas seized power in Gaza. Abu Mazen refused to sign a «final» peace treaty with Israel on terms offered by the Muslim Barack Obama. He then refused to go for Trump’s «Deal of the Century». Trump’s plan differed little from Obama’s. Hamas consistently refuses to recognize Israel’s right to exist and intensively accumulates weapons for the upcoming destruction of Israel, continues to build a system of underground tunnels under Gaza and its environs, entering Israeli territory. Develops a military industry and holds the population of Gaza in the position of hostages. Attempts to soften this line of Hamas, including the proposals of Yair Lapid, the leaders of Hamas shoaled out of the door. They took the war to Israel. They will be satisfied only with the destruction of the Jewish state through genocide or the flight of Jews. And they really hope that Putin, after Ukraine, will unleash his hired killers (“contractors”) on Israel. http://aaronblog.co/2022/04/palestine-wants-not-peace-but-the-destruction-of-israel/

The people of Eastern Europe asked to join NATO in order to protect themselves from the aggression of imperial Russia. How their fears are justified has been convincingly proved by Russia’s current aggression against Ukraine. Ukraine does not need NATO if it is strong enough. As Israel’s experience has shown, nuclear weapons in the hands of a small country are a deterrent against powerful neighbors. If the Ukrainians really acquire nuclear weapons, they will be able to protect all of Europe from the impending Russian occupation. In the 1990s, Ukraine surrendered its nuclear warheads to Russia. Now Ukrainians are very sorry about it. Putin would not have dared to attack a nuclear Ukraine either in 2014 or 2022. The Russian\Soviet yoke in Eastern Europe was supported by the aggression of the USSR. Let us recall the occupation of Hungary in 1956, Czechoslovakia in 1968, and the military coup in Poland in 1981. In 1991, the countries of Eastern and Central Europe freed themselves from the Soviet yoke. These countries have chosen Europe, not their yesterday’s enslavers. In recent years, Eastern European nationalists (Hungary, Austria, Poland) have strengthened ties with Russia to counterbalance the dictates of the Franco-German tandem. Putin destroyed this balance. Due to his aggression, he drove Central and Eastern Europe under the wing of the West. The same goes for Israel. Now we have no choice. Despite the fact that the West betrayed us and sold us out, Putin turned out to be more dangerous than Biden and Europe. Israel needs to focus on itself and on the newly created Middle East alliance. ……………… Polls show that 70% of Russians are Putinoids. Putin started his aggression primarily in order to stay in power, to crush the best part of the Russians, the remained 30%. In order for 70% to change their attitude towards aggression and Putin, Russia needs to inflict a military defeat. And for this, it is necessary to provide Ukraine with comprehensive assistance: economic and military. There is no need to fight instead of Ukrainians, they do it better than cowardly Europeans. We must give them the necessary weapons. First of all, air defense systems and aircraft. ………….. Israel gave up all the territories occupied in 1967 and received a war of annihilation and terror as a thank you. The worldwide anti-Semitic pandemonium against the Jewish state is simply a continuation of eternal anti-Semitism. In the case of Russia, the opposite is true. Russia is the largest state in the world in terms of territory. And this is not enough for them. They set out to take over Europe and then the Middle East. Then world domination shines on them. Now the Europeans have suddenly found themselves in the shoes of the Israelis: Russia wants to destroy them. Russian atrocities in Ukraine are quite deliberate. So they show Europe what awaits them if they dare to resist. Europeans are obliged to help Ukraine, otherwise, they will face the Russian yoke. I hope Europe wakes up from both fear and anti-Semitism.

http://aaronblog.co/2022/02/recognition-of-jewish-settlements-is-the-way-to-peace/

First, let’s discuss «settlements» from the point of view of the Geneva convention. The case of the West Bank does not fall under the definition of the Geneva Convention, paragraph 49, which speaks of the occupation by one «power» of the territory of another «power». Until 1993, when a “Power” called the Palestinian Authority was created with the consent of Israel, Israel did not occupy the territory of another “Power”, that is the territory of another state. Jordanian control over the West Bank, not recognized by any state in the world, ended in 1967. Then Israel became the only «power» in the West Bank, and that’s when we created the settlements. That is, Israel had the legal right to settle its citizens in this territory, until 1993, the moment when we created the Palestinian Authority or the second «power» in this territory. Israel has not established any new settlements since 1993. Moreover, on its own initiative, our «Power» liquidated three settlements in the West Bank and more than a dozen Jewish settlements in Gaza. This is what the Jewish “Disengagement” looked like, which provoked a new attack of aggressiveness among the Palestinians and all anti-Semites. Further, according to the Oslo peace treaty, half of the territory of the West Bank, where all Jewish settlements are located (zone «C»), should remain under the jurisdiction of Israel until the signing of a new agreement between the parties. Thus, after 1993, Israel does not violate the Geneva Convention. Even if the Jewish settlements were not legal in the first place (which I dispute on the basis of an accurate, literal interpretation of paragraph 49 of the Geneva Convention), the Oslo Accords provided a legal basis for the continued existence and development of these settlements. Only a new treaty between Israel and Palestine can change the status of Jewish settlements. The only question is whether the destruction of Jewish settlements will really lead to peace. As we have already seen, the unilateral «disengagement» and the forcible transfer of the Jewish population lead not to peace, but to war. The absence of a mention of settlements in the Oslo treaties means that the Palestinians did not demand the demolition of these settlements. The demand for the transfer of Jews is a new demand, that is, a violation of the concluded agreement. In fact, the Palestinians do not hide this truth. According to the rules of Islam, all agreements with «infidels» are invalid in advance and Muslims are obliged to violate them. As we know, the “international community” adopted other laws. If the Palestinians did not demand the expulsion of the Jews from Palestine in the treaty they signed, then by default they recognized the Jewish right to live here. ……………… Now let’s discuss the «occupation». Anti-Semites claim that Israel is «occupying» the West Bank. Hamas claims that Israel is occupying all of Israel’s territory, including Tel Aviv and Haifa, not to mention Jerusalem. The Israeli ultra-right believe that Palestine occupies some part of Israel in zones A and B. Israel and Palestine are parts of the same small country. The boundaries are not precisely defined and are a matter of dispute. Does international law consider the settlement of a disputed territory an occupation? I have never seen such a statement anywhere. The creation of settlements in the disputed territory does not fall under paragraph 49 of the Geneva Convention. If we began to evict the population from disputed territories such as Crimea, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, South Sakhalin, and the Kuriles, Kashmir, Arunachal Pradesh on the border of China and India, Western Sahara, Gibraltar, Ceuta, Melilla, Northern Cyprus, Atacama (Chile and Bolivia disputed territory), Guyana, West Irian, etc., about 20 million people would have to be transferred. …………. According to international law, third countries are obliged to consider the border between states to be the dividing line that the disputing parties established in the LAST treaty they signed. In our case, such an agreement was signed by Yasser Arafat and Benjamin Netanyahu in 1998. The temporary, but at the same time the most legal border between Israel and Palestine runs along the line separating zones A and B from zone C. This border was established in the last treaty signed by Israel and Palestine. Therefore, Israel OWNS Area C, even if only temporarily. The state cannot occupy its own territory. Anti-Semites have no legal basis to call Israel an occupier. It’s just another blood libel. The Trump administration has recognized the legitimacy of Jewish settlements in the West Bank. Trump has proven he is not an anti-Semite. Now it’s Biden’s turn. As for Europe, everything is clear. Most of today’s Europeans are descendants of those who supported Hitler’s anti-Semitic policies. Today, millions of Europeans use the property that they inherited as a result of the genocide or the expulsion of Jews from Europe. Seen in this light, Europe’s demand to «return to the 1949 borders», that is, to carry out the transfer of Jews, looks especially immoral. Another thing is that it is time to resolve the issue of the status of the Palestinians living in zone C. They must be given the rights of residents of Israel and thus the accusations of apartheid should be dropped. The Palestinians can convincingly prove their desire for peace only by recognizing the right of Jews to live in this country, including the West Bank. Just as Israel recognized the right of 2.5 million Arab citizens of Israel to live in our country. If the Palestinians ever want peace, they can prove it by recognizing the Jews of Judea and Samaria as citizens of Palestine.

PEACE IN EXCHANGE FOR THE TERRITORY, OR MONEY IN EXCHANGE FOR WAR? «Adopting 3 Middle East Drafts, General Assembly Calls for Launching Credible Talks on Final Status Issues, Respecting Historic Status Quo of Jerusalem Holy Sites» “By further terms, it also called upon Israel to cease all unilateral actions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and called upon all States not to recognize any changes to the pre‑1967 borders and not to render aid or assistance to illegal settlement activities. Also adopted was a resolution titled “Jerusalem”, in which the Assembly reiterated its determination that any actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, to impose its laws, jurisdiction, and administration on the Holy City of Jerusalem are illegal” GILAD MENASHE ERDAN (Israel) “The three resolutions the Assembly will vote on have only one purpose — to demonize Israel,” he said, calling it an annual package of vicious anti-Israel resolutions against Israel and promoting a false version of the Palestinians. Year after year, precious time, effort, and resources are wasted instead of focusing on the world’s most pressing issues. « …………… What did the UN General Assembly decide in these resolutions? The call for 1967 borders strictly violates the UN Charter. According to international law, the legal border between the states constitutes the line signed by BOTH INVOLVED SIDES in their LAST agreement. Such LAST AGREEMENT was signed by Netanyahu and Arafat in 1998 (Wye Plantation agreement). This agreement outlaws the so-called “1967” or “1949” lines. Adopting illegal «lines» instead of a legal border, established due to the Oslo agreement, the UN violates its own Charter. Thus, at the heart of these, like most other UN decisions about Israel, lies iniquity and the Big Lie, which all mankind has become accustomed to considering as the Law. Just the Oslo agreements confirm the legality of «actions taken by Israel» in Jerusalem, and the legality of the Jewish settlements of the West Bank. Now, let’s start with the terminology. They took a decision on the «question of Palestine». In fact, the problem is not with the Palestinians, but with Israel, which for 75 years has been subjected to defamation and attempts of destruction. The «question of Palestine» has long been resolved the way the Palestinians themselves and their patrons, the anti-Semites of the entire planet, desired. Namely, the State of Jordan was first created Palestinian State, which was separated from Palestine in 1922 with the clearly formulated goal of ensuring the national rights of the Arabs of Palestine. A few Jews were evicted from there. Already in 1946, this state gained independence and managed to take part in two aggressions against Israel (in 1948 and 1967). Let me remind you that during the first peace talks between Israel and the Arabs in 1992 («Madrid Conference»), a joint Jordanian-Palestinian delegation was created. Oslo’s separate accords violated this principle of Palestinian-Arab unity. The current relationship between Palestinians and the non-Palestinian population of Jordan is an internal Jordanian affair. Why should the state of Jordan, created on the territory of Palestine, be ethnically clean of all non-Palestinian elements, be they Bedouins, Arabs-immigrants, Circassians, and Christians? Second, the Oslo process created a de facto second Palestinian state that included the West Bank and Gaza. The Israel Defense Forces were withdrawn from most of this state. The Palestinians and their patrons abused the peacefulness of the people of Israel and tried to destroy the Jewish state by the method of an all-out terrorist war, which they called the «Intifada». The State of Israel was forced to re-occupy the state of Palestine we had created. Israel’s attempt to appease the UN and the anti-Semites through a unilateral withdrawal from Gaza led to the creation of a third separate Palestinian state with its terrorist authorities independent of the government in Ramallah. Thus, the Palestinians already have three states. Two of these states, the West Bank and Gaza, are actively fighting to destroy Israel. Moreover, they are waging a war, not at their own expense. All their expenses are covered by «donors». The cannon fodder for this war is provided by an organization created by the UN 74 years ago to help then-real Palestinian refugees. Since then, Palestinian refugees have largely died out, and their multiplied descendants are raised and educated by anti-Semites for the sole purpose of destroying Israel. Note that Israel has solved on its own the problem of Jewish refugees, more numerous than the Palestinian refugees known to the whole world. A quarter of a century ago, the first and oldest Palestinian state, Jordan, signed a peace treaty with Israel and established a «cold peace» with us. The other two Palestinian states refuse to reconcile on any terms, demanding the destruction of the Jewish state. There is a strong impression that the Palestinians consider it beneficial for themselves to parasitize due to the war of destruction. As they fight, billions of «aid» continue to flow into the accounts of Mahmoud Abbas and Hamas. They prefer money in exchange for war over «peace in exchange for territory». ……………… The issue of recognizing the state of Palestine remains controversial for a few reasons. Most of the UN member states recognized Palestine. But according to the UN Charter, an independent state must first confirm its economic viability. Two out of three Palestinians (West Bank and Gaza) do not meet this criterion. Despite huge economic aid, the Palestinians are unable to provide their own food and other needs on their own. In addition, due to the split, it is unclear how many Palestinian states should be recognized as “independent”. The demand for recognition of Palestine’s independence by Israel was put forward during the Obama presidency. Then Barack Obama advised Mahmoud Abbas to withdraw this requirement. Why? Because the proclamation of Palestinian independence in the context of the continuing occupation would not change anything in reality. The Palestinians themselves provoked the Israeli occupation by their rejection of the peace and their aggressive behavior. They could have lost their main trump card: the ability to pretend to be Israel’s victim and demand extensive financial «help». That is why the Israeli government should consider the possibility of formal recognition of the State of Palestine within the boundaries stipulated by the 1998 agreement, that is, the latest of the Oslo agreements. At the same time, until the signing of a peace treaty, the status quo will remain, namely: Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and restrictions on Gaza will continue. …………… What can the Israeli «government of change» do under these conditions? First, to finally begin to resist the terrorist aggression of the Palestinians on the territory of Israel. A new round of aggression, which began in May 2021, led to the fact that the Palestinians moved the war to the territory of Israel and involved the Arabs, the citizens of Israel, in their war, against their will. Secondly, take into account the fact that currently, the main pretext for the continuation of the Palestinian aggression is the question of Jerusalem. We must take the initiative on the subject of holy places. Our approach should be based on the principle: holy places are sacred for Jews, Muslims, and Christians. Simultaneously, Jerusalem touches the national feelings of Jews and Palestinians. Three years ago I put forward a concept stating that the responsibility for the holy places should be taken not by politicians and the military, but by representatives of religious confessions. The state, in this case, Israel, can take over security. If peace is established between Israel and Palestine, then the control of security in the holy places can become joint. This idea has already found a response. In May 2021, Erdogan proposed to Putin to launch a joint strike on Israel in order to «liberate Jerusalem.» Putin’s answer was that the question of the holy places of Jerusalem should be decided by representatives of three Abrahamic denominations, not politicians. Now is the time for Israel’s «government of change» to embrace this concept as well. «Internationalisation» of the Holy Places of Jerusalem will get the shape of the cooperation of the «Abrahamic» confessions. http://aaronblog.co/2021/12/un-lie-instead-of-resolving-problem/

“The Netflix platform has released a collection of 32 films under the title “Palestinian Stories”. Most of these works — and according to other sources, the vast majority — were filmed by supporters of the anti-Israeli movement BDS. Not only that, Netflix consulted with BDS on the list of films. Twelve of the filmmakers whose films are in the collection signed a deceitful “Anti-Apartheid” Letter in May, with the traditional accusations of Israel’s lynching, ethnic cleansing, and more." ………… Those who paid for the filming of the «talented» anti-Semitic tapes paid Netflix to distribute them. It is not the poor Palestinians who are waging a war of destruction against us, but the richest people on the planet and their international corporations. As in the days of Hitler, anti-Semitism is once again the ideology of the rich. Now it figures under the name «anti-Zionism» or the “Palestine Cause”. The destruction of Israel is a bogeyman of those who have already seized power over the planet. The Palestinians are just a necessary cog in a huge machine, and they are paid for their role. No, Israel is not digging its own grave. But among us, there are mercenaries of anti-Semitic tycoons, and they are in power in Israel.

All I may answer is to repeat My claims. The fact is that the Palestinian Authority rejects all peace initiatives, be it the Obama/Kerry initiative or the Trump initiative. By the way, Trump's initiative does not so differ from Obama's initiative. HAMAS rejects all peace proposals, claiming annihilation of the Jewish State. The only explanation of such behavior is that Palestine is seeking liquidation of the Jewish State using different methods and obtaining support from different forces of the World Village. Palestine is waging a war with the purpose to annihilate us. The only way to maintain Israel alive is to occupy Palestine. This equation is quite simple.

Aaron blog to: Muxtar Zülfüqar According to the Qur’an (Sura al-Maida 5.21), Moses, on behalf of Allah, ordered the Children of Israel to enter the Holy Land, which Allah himself «intended» for them. Today the Jews are carrying out this order of Allah. So, why are Palestinians and many Muslims opposed to Zionism? After all, the Zionists are doing the will of Allah! … You say that there is no call to kill Jews in the Qur’an. If so, why is it that the Muslims of Palestine are killing Jews since 1200 CE up to this day? Zionism began with the Jews organizing self-defense against constant murder. The first Jew to take up arms for self-defense was Alexander Zeid. We created the State of Israel precisely to protect Jews from murder. The wars that our neighbors have imposed on us have killed 25,000 Israeli soldiers. By the way, 150 of the dead soldiers were Muslims of the Israeli army. A memorial was built for them not far from my house. If we had not defended ourselves, we would have been destroyed long ago. Grand Mufti Amin al Husseini fled Europe after the defeat of his friend Hitler and tried to stage a new Holocaust in the Middle East. It was he who asked Hitler for permission to kill all Jews in the Middle East. Hitler blessed him and promised to help, but his armies did not reach Palestine. Rommel’s army was stopped in Egypt, and Hitler’s other army fled in fear from the Caucasus: they were threatened with encirclement after Stalingrad. Then al Husseini created an army in Palestine but was defeated. Then he staged pogroms in various Arab countries and forced the governments of these countries to enter the war against Israel. We lost 20,000 soldiers, but we survived. Since some of the Palestinians wanted peace with the Jews, the Mufti ordered (exactly ordered) the Palestinians to leave the territory of Israel. 700,000 Palestinians obeyed his orders. Today it is called the Nakba. 200,000 did not submit to the Mufti. Today there are already 2,000,000 Arabs in Israel. These are the Israeli Arabs. 800,000 Jews fled Arab countries from the pogroms and persecutions inspired by Amin al Husseini. Today their descendants are half of Israel’s Jews. The other half are descendants of Jews who managed to escape the Holocaust. Some Jews who fled from Arab countries settled in France and the United States. Most of the Jews in France today are their descendants. Unfortunately, the Palestinians have not abandoned the idea of Amin al Husseini to this day. Not only Hamas but also Mahmoud Abbas do not want to reconcile with Israel and do not accept any peace proposals. They are counting on the help of anti-Semites who seek to arrange a new Holocaust for the Jews.

Mahmud Abbas rejected a 2-state solution proposal by Horovitz (MERETZ anti-Zionist party). Thus, Abbas, like HAMAS, frankly seeks the annihilation of Israel. First, the Palestinians force the occupation, then perform criminal aggression against Israeli people under the pretext of «Israeli Occupation». The «Democrat» Squad promotes this Hitler-like propaganda trick. The Palestinians do NOT have the right to aggression under the pretext of the Israeli occupation that they themselves force. https://aaronblog.co/2021/10/why-does-entire-world-helps-in-ousting-jews/

Islamic beliefs do not necessarily imply enmity towards Israel. As we know, the second hero of the Quran after Muhammad is Moses, who, at the behest of Allah, brought the Children of Israel to their «assigned» land. As the spiritual luminaries of the Salafists of Saudi Arabia concluded, «The Koran does not require the destruction of Israel.» This spiritual ordinance opened the way for the «Covenants of Abraham.» In fact, it condemned the Hamas Charter. The Hamas charter is based not on the Qur’an, but on the Hadiths, not by accident. Hamas substantiates its demand to destroy Israel with a letter that the Caliph sent to the Muslim troops who conquered Syria and Iraq in the 7th century. The Caliph declared these conquered lands to be the property of Muslims. The sultans of Turkey, who declared themselves Caliphs, acted in the same spirit, populating the Holy Land with Muslims and transferring to settlers large tracts of land. Muslim rulers forbade the Jews to emigrate to their homeland. Thus, in the case of Palestine, there is a clear contradiction between the instructions of the Qur’an and Islamic laws based on the Hadith. Muslims believe that in the event of such a conflict, they should obey the instructions not of the Hadith, but of the Quran. Hamas’ goals are illegal from an Islamic point of view. Muslims have the right to disagree with Hamas and support Israel in its struggle for recognition. Moreover, Allah sent three very clear warnings to Muslims for their attempts to destroy Israel. The first warning was the 1948 Nakba. The second was the 1967 Six-Day War (Nahsa). And the third was the Arab Spring, which began in 2011 and has not ended to this day. Many Muslims have decided to submit to the will of Allah and recognize Israel. http://aaronblog.co/2021/09/islam-vs-israel/

Now Israelis are discussing the issue of the participation of Arab parties in the Israeli government. In principle, the entry of minority representatives into government should be encouraged. But why is the majority of Israelis opposed to the participation of Arab politicians in the government? There are good reasons for this: for decades, Arab politicians have called for the destruction of the Jewish state, solidarized with the Palestinian terror, and in general with the war of the Palestinians, Hezbollah, and our other enemies seeking to destroy the Jewish state. The last four-time elections have seen a change in the mood of Arab voters. The destruction of Israel was put aside, maybe temporarily. Now the Arabs want to participate in the life of the state, to join its government. They demand to turn Israel into a «state of all citizens». This desire should be welcomed. Arab politicians, on behalf of their constituents, must openly and bluntly recognize the fundamental right of the Jewish majority: the right to exist as a majority. This means that Arab politicians representing their constituents must recognize the Jews’ right to Zionism. Netanyahu tried to get the Palestinians to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. He prudently passed the Nation Law, which proclaimed Israel a Jewish Zionist state. Having entered the government of the Zionist state, the Arabs de facto recognized this state, including the Law on the Nation. True, at inter-Arab forums, Islamist RAAM leader Mansur Abbas continues to assert that he is waging jihad by his own special methods. But those Arabs who voted for his party voted precisely for the recognition of Israel. At least I have heard this opinion from many ordinary Arabs, not politicians. Let’s hope that in the next elections the share of these voters will increase, and their politicians will accept the wishes of their voters. Hamas launched the 2021 jihad precisely to stop reconciliation between Arabs and Jews in general, and especially reconciliation within Israel. ………… The time has come to reach a compromise with those Arabs in Israel who are willing to put up with the Jews. The common denominator of such a compromise should be the formula «Israel is the Zionist state of all citizens.» Although this slogan looks like a paradox, in fact, we are moving towards this very solution. Whether we like it or not, Arabs are citizens of Israel. If Bennett and Ayelet Shaked’s program on the annexation of «Zone C» is implemented, another half a million will be added to the current two million Arab citizens. In accordance with this formula, Jews recognize the right of Arabs to participate in government, and Arabs recognize the right of Jews to Zionism, in accordance with the Law of Return. Israel recognizes the right of Palestinians to return to Palestine (West Bank and Jordan), and Palestinians recognize the right of Jews to return to Israel. Until now, most Arabs (except for the Druze and some of the Bedouins, Christians, and Muslims) were anti-Zionists, as Arab politicians have repeatedly stated. The politicians imposed an anti-Zionist position on all Arabs, often against their will. Today, most Arabs want to live well in Israel and at this stage are not interested in the destruction of the state, which provided them with equal opportunities for development and self-expression. Refugees from Syria are striving to Europe in order to secure a decent life for themselves. The Arabs of Israel do not need to run anywhere. Europe came to their home in the form of a Jewish state. …………… For decades, Arab politicians have been able to impose their anti-Zionist stance on both the Arabs and the Jewish majority. Once they managed to bring the anti-Zionist government of Rabin to power. This government did not fall, thanks to the support of Arab MPs who passed the Oslo Accords with a majority of 1 vote. In exchange for this support, Rabin stopped aliyah from the former USSR and took drastic measures to discriminate against new immigrants. For example, he stopped housing construction, exacerbating the housing crisis. Rabin received a loan of $ 10 billion specifically for the construction of housing and the arrangement of repatriates and did not spend a single shekel on the stated goals. Then we went to demonstrations against Rabin, and Larisa Trembovler demonstratively married Rabin’s killer, Yigal Amir. I hope Bennett doesn’t follow Rabin’s path. But I am afraid that Lapid will be able to do this when, after the rotation, he becomes prime minister. For the people of Israel, the best solution would be a right-wing «government of change», in which the Likud and current coalition members will participate, but without Lapid and the left-wing parties. …………. The Palestinians, represented by their leaders, have never abandoned the goal of expelling Jews from Palestine through assassinations, war, economic and political pressure. The Palestinian war against the Jews has actually been going on for 800 years. If Arabs want to influence and participate in government, they must abandon anti-Zionism. This is the essence of the «paradoxical», but, actually, realistic solution. The last few days have proved that the Israeli Arabs are making a historic turning point: just the Arabs extradited the two Palestinian terrorists who had escaped from the Gilboa prison. ………….. Islamic beliefs do not necessarily imply enmity towards Israel. As we know, the second hero of the Quran after Muhammad is Moses, who, at the behest of Allah, brought the Children of Israel to their «assigned» land. As the spiritual luminaries of the Salafists of Saudi Arabia concluded, «The Koran does not require the destruction of Israel.» This spiritual ordinance opened the way for the «Covenants of Abraham.» In fact, it condemned the Hamas Charter. The Hamas charter is based not on the Qur’an, but on the Hadiths, not by accident. Hamas substantiates its demand to destroy Israel with a letter that the Muslim Caliph sent to the Muslim troops who conquered Syria and Iraq in the 7th century. The Caliph declared these conquered lands to be the property of Muslims. The sultans of Turkey, who declared themselves Caliphs, acted in the same spirit, populating the Holy Land with Muslims and transferring to settlers large tracts of land. Muslim rulers forbade the Jews to emigrate to their homeland. Thus, in the case of Palestine, there is a clear contradiction between the instructions of the Qur’an and Islamic laws based on the Hadith. Muslims believe that in the event of such a conflict, they should obey the instructions not of the Hadith, but of the Quran. Hamas’ goals are illegal from an Islamic point of view. Muslims have the right to disagree with Hamas and support Israel in its struggle for recognition. Moreover, Allah sent three very clear warnings to Muslims for their attempts to destroy Israel. The first warning was the 1948 Nakba. The second was the 1967 Six-Day War (Nahsa). And the third was the Arab Spring, which began in 2011 and has not ended to this day. Many Muslims have decided to submit to the will of Allah and recognize Israel. ……… .. So, the Islamic Arab party RAAM did not accidentally enter the Israeli government. This event reflects the will of a large group, perhaps the majority of Arab voters. This is not a tactic, but a strategy. True, Professor Keidar believes that this party is a typical jihadist. In his opinion, the purpose of their entry into the government is to fight against the state from within the government. Indeed, a prominent member of the party, Sheikh Salah Raad, is serving a prison sentence for calling for the riot. His successor, Sheikh Khatib, is awaiting trial for similar actions. On the other hand, Islamists are sensitive to the social demands of Muslims. It turned out that their main electoral base seeks to use the advantages of a Jewish democratic state. After the conclusion of the Abraham Accords, Arab politicians received a «carte blanche» to recognize the Jewish state, enter its government and act in favor of their constituents. ………… So, the Islamic party RAAM offered Netanyahu to support his government, and this proposal was accepted. Likud’s ultra-right allies blocked such an opportunity. Bennett decided to take such a step, and that is why he is now the prime minister, and Netanyahu is in opposition. http://aaronblog.co/2021/09/zionist-state-of-all-citizens/