Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

A Generalization Of The Lorentz Ether Interpretation To The Einstein Equations Of Gr

Lorentz ether general relativity

  • Please log in to reply
92 replies to this topic

#86 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3598 posts

Posted 04 December 2019 - 04:46 AM

I did a write up but posted it in a new thread here, I did not want to hijack your thread.

#87 TonyYuan2020

TonyYuan2020

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 167 posts

Posted 22 February 2020 - 03:16 AM

The speed of light we measure on the earth by traditional methods is always constant. Just like a car in the water, the speed of the car is calculated by the distance / round-trip time between point A and point B, which will never change.



We cannot conclude that the speed of light is constant in any inertial reference frame. Like a car in water, its speed relative to the water surface is different from the speed relative to the ground.



Without any hypothesis, we can explain why the interference fringes can not be observed in the Morey experiment by using the conventional physical theory.



http://www.sciencefo...ference-fringe/

Edited by TonyYuan2020, 22 February 2020 - 03:17 AM.


#88 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3598 posts

Posted 22 February 2020 - 10:11 AM

But it's not a constant, even Einstein demonstrated this from general relativity, it is only a true constant as we understand it, in a vacuum. What Einstein didn't seem to accept was that if light was spatially variable, it is also temporally variable which is interesting he could not accept that part, because it meant even his theory was incomplete and believing it is temporally variable also meant it would cause contradictions by the principles he set in place for special relativity.

#89 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3598 posts

Posted 22 February 2020 - 10:13 AM

The temporal variation of light does naturally lead to a tired light theory, something that has attracted the attention of scientists, but because the mainstream is set in its own ways, the theory has often be classed as a nonsense.

#90 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3598 posts

Posted 22 February 2020 - 11:51 AM

What is interesting though is that some believe it will lead to a decay formalism in curved space, but this is only an assumption, for if there is no simpler particle to decay into, then it will not in principle.

#91 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3598 posts

Posted 22 February 2020 - 11:55 AM

The real question then, is whether light truly loses energy, it may just require a new updated model so that there is no true loss of energy, but only appears that way.

#92 Dubbelosix

Dubbelosix

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3598 posts

Posted 22 February 2020 - 04:40 PM

I suppose the tired light probably is a type of deceleration radiation analagous to how the electron experiences the Larmor radiation. I shouldn't hijack this thread any more so will try and write up a better foundation in time.

#93 TonyYuan2020

TonyYuan2020

    Questioning

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 167 posts

Posted 23 February 2020 - 10:25 PM

 

But it's not a constant, even Einstein demonstrated this from general relativity, it is only a true constant as we understand it, in a vacuum. What Einstein didn't seem to accept was that if light was spatially variable, it is also temporally variable which is interesting he could not accept that part, because it meant even his theory was incomplete and believing it is temporally variable also meant it would cause contradictions by the principles he set in place for special relativity.

 

Let's sort out the whole process:
1. Morey's experiment, at that time, scientists could not explain it with Newton's theory.
2. Constant speed of light is applied to Lorentz transformation.
3. Einstein put forward the hypothesis that the speed of light is constant and established special relativity.

But now we can easily explain the Morey experiment with classical physics, and conclude that it is wrong to keep the speed of light constant.

Special relativity is a fallacy under the wrong premise.

Edited by TonyYuan2020, 23 February 2020 - 10:38 PM.




Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Lorentz ether, general relativity