Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Free Bus Tickets From Trump


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Moronium

Moronium

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2894 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 01:53 PM

From El Paso to San Francisco, L.A. or other select places of your choosing if you have broken U.S. law and illegally busted into our country.

 

Any place that has declared itself to be a "sanctuary city" and makes it illegal to even ask about your immigration status.  El Paso, and the like, is full, aint gunna take no more, and aint keepin what they got now, either:

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Friday he is considering releasing "Illegal Immigrants" [in sanctuary cities]

 

"Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only," Trump tweeted. He added that, "The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy - so this should make them very happy!"

 

He told reporters later Friday he was "strongly looking at" the idea.

 

"They're always saying they have open arms. Let's see if they have open arms," he said.

 

 

Trump is "finally" considering the needs and desires of these poor law-breakers, eh?  He's gunna send them to places where they have free housing, free health care, free lawyers, pocket money, free needles, free contraceptives, free heroin shooting zones, free sidewalks to crap on, and damn near everything else an indigent person could ask for.  It's like, Nirvana.  Trump cares!

 

100,000 of them a month can join their homeys.  Seeing as how border patrol spends $4,000 per day on them, this will also benefit the average taxpayer immensely.

 

Many Americans believe they should be nowhere in the country, of course.  But if the laws as they stand say we gotta harbor them somewhere for years, then what better place for them than a good old sanctuary city, ya know?  In the meantime, ICE will get their fingerprints, DNA, and other identifying factors so they can all be rounded up for deportation in a few years.

 

There is the risk of serious danger to the poor aliens, though, I suppose.  Just like the "racist" Mexicans in Tijuana turned on them, places like S.F. might too.  But not likely.  People in S.F. aint racist like that.

 

Then again, Nancy Pelosi, a Bay Area resident, doesn't seem too happy, eh?

 

A White House proposal to release immigrant detainees in San Francisco and other sanctuary cities triggered a fierce backlash Friday from Democrats including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose office called the idea “despicable."

Edited by Moronium, 12 April 2019 - 04:26 PM.


#2 OceanBreeze

OceanBreeze

    Creating

  • Moderators
  • 1036 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 04:00 PM

A White House proposal to release immigrant detainees in San Francisco and other sanctuary cities triggered a fierce backlash Friday from Democrats including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose office called the idea “despicable."

 

I think they should send about 20 busloads of the illegals over to Pelosi's estate in Napa Valley.

There is plenty of room, tennis courts, swimming pools and all the wine they could ever drink.

 

Only one small problem; the whole place is surrounded by a wall.

Pelosi-Zinfandel-Lane-address-concealed-



#3 Moronium

Moronium

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2894 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 04:11 PM

Great idea, Popeye!  Then all those drunken winos wouldn't be bothered by the cops in S.F.  Well, not that they would anyway, but they might have to kill people to get their wine there, so.....



#4 Moronium

Moronium

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2894 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 04:17 PM

Only one small problem; the whole place is surrounded by a wall.

 

 

But, wait....Nancy done said walls are immoral, I thought.  What's up with that?

 

Maybe I get it...she probably figures they're only immoral if they're designed to keep people out.

 

In her case, she uses a wall them to keep the wetbacks in, picking grapes 24/7, probably.



#5 fahrquad

fahrquad

    All I know is that I know nothing.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1161 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 04:26 PM

But, wait....Nancy done said walls are immoral, I thought.  What's up with that?

 

Maybe I get it...she probably figures they're only immoral if they're designed to keep people out.

 

In her case, she uses a wall them to keep the wetbacks in, picking grapes 24/7, probably.

 

It is there to keep those damned wombats out.



#6 fahrquad

fahrquad

    All I know is that I know nothing.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1161 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 04:39 PM

From El Paso to San Francisco, L.A. or other select places of your choosing if you have broken U.S. law and illegally busted into our country.

 

Any place that has declared itself to be a "sanctuary city" and makes it illegal to even ask about your immigration status.  El Paso, and the like, is full, aint gunna take no more, and aint keepin what they got now, either:

 

 

Trump is "finally" considering the needs and desires of these poor law-breakers, eh?  He's gunna send them to places where they have free housing, free health care, free lawyers, pocket money, free needles, free contraceptives, free heroin shooting zones, free sidewalks to crap on, and damn near everything else an indigent person could ask for.  It's like, Nirvana.  Trump cares!

 

100,000 of them a month can join their homeys.  Seeing as how border patrol spends $4,000 per day on them, this will also benefit the average taxpayer immensely.

 

Many Americans believe they should be nowhere in the country, of course.  But if the laws as they stand say we gotta harbor them somewhere for years, then what better place for them than a good old sanctuary city, ya know?  In the meantime, ICE will get their fingerprints, DNA, and other identifying factors so they can all be rounded up for deportation in a few years.

 

There is the risk of serious danger to the poor aliens, though, I suppose.  Just like the "racist" Mexicans in Tijuana turned on them, places like S.F. might too.  But not likely.  People in S.F. aint racist like that.

 

Then again, Nancy Pelosi, a Bay Area resident, doesn't seem too happy, eh?

 

Once we have them on buses, why not just drive them to Puebla Mexico and tell them it is Puebla New Mexico?  Since it is 1685 miles from Puebla MX to Mexicali I doubt any will make it back to the US.


Edited by fahrquad, 12 April 2019 - 04:48 PM.


#7 Moronium

Moronium

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2894 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 08:28 PM

The outraged reaction is starting to pour in.  Virtually every MSN outlet claims that Trump is trying to "dump" illegal aliens in sanctuary cities--almost always in the headline.

 

"Dump?"

 

Like they're garbage or something?  I don't get it.   Why aren't they celebrating this huge gift?  These are the people they want most and entice to take up residency.  You'd think they'd be running to pay for the bus tickets themselves, eh? 



#8 Moronium

Moronium

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2894 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 10:15 PM

That damn Trump is such a liar, eh?  He's backing off this promise already.

 

Now he aint gunna pay for no tickets.

 

Instead he has employed some experienced caravan organizers to keep the caravans walking all the way to S.F.

 

Some Texas cowboys have volunteered to drive the herd, though, which should help expedite the process.

 


Edited by Moronium, 12 April 2019 - 11:13 PM.


#9 fahrquad

fahrquad

    All I know is that I know nothing.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1161 posts

Posted 12 April 2019 - 10:42 PM

How racist of you to equate human beings to cattle!!!  :shocked:

 

(not that I didn't get a wicked little chuckle out of it)



#10 Moronium

Moronium

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2894 posts

Posted 13 April 2019 - 05:35 AM

How racist of you to equate human beings to cattle!!!  :shocked:

 

I like the line from the tune which says:  "Don't try to understand em...just ride, rope, and brand em....."



#11 Moronium

Moronium

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2894 posts

Posted 13 April 2019 - 06:47 PM

Reverse psychology aint gunna work with Trump, sorry, AP.

 

An idea floated by President Trump to send immigrants from the border to "sanctuary cities"could end up doing the migrants a favor by placing them in locations that make it easier to put down roots and stay in the country, according to a report by The Associated Press.

 

The plan would put thousands of immigrants in cities that are not only welcoming to them, but also more likely to rebuff federal officials carrying out deportation orders. Many of these locations have more resources to help immigrants make their legal cases to stay in the United States than smaller cities, with some of the nation's biggest immigration advocacy groups based in places like San Francisco, New York City and Chicago.

 

The plan discussed by Trump would have financial, logistical and legal issues.

 

The transportation of immigrants who are arrested at the border to large and faraway .cities would be burdensome and costly at a time when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is already stretched thin,

 

They'll all be rounded up later.  ICE will implant a GPS receiver in their azz before they can go.

 

As for the cost, well, that's why Trump is gunna make them walk. It would be like an evening stroll after trekking clean across Mexico, ya know?

 

It's not unprecedented, and has been done before. Ever heard of the "trail of tears?"


Edited by Moronium, 14 April 2019 - 09:54 AM.