What exactly are "the facts of relativity," as you see it, eh, Ralf?
I see SR as a hypothetical theory which does not, as such, establish any facts. As a theory, it just serves to "explain" facts external to it to a better or worse degree.
Moronium, just sneaking in a related point, that of your insistence that the Lorentz transform is a valid principal in Physics.
Just found this article that offers a reward to anyone who can disprove the claim that the Lorentz transform violates the well known Conservation of momentum theory.
Pick up the cash and silence critics of Lorentz such as myself, in one blow!
Surely its a golden opportunity for you!
I'll wait patiently.