Jump to content
Science Forums

Plasma assisted engines fuel efficient, cleaner


C1ay

Recommended Posts

Gasoline, diesel, and turbine engines could soon burn cleaner or be more fuel efficient through the application of Plasma Assisted Combustion, a technology originated and developed at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and now poised to enter the marketplace.

 

The Laboratory has entered into a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with PerriQuest Defense Research Enterprises, LLC to advance the technology for commercial refinement and implementation. PerriQuest, based in Meriden, CT, Los Alamos, and Idaho National Laboratory are collaborating on the research and development of Plasma Assisted Combustion, under a licensing agreement with Los Alamos, for turbine and internal combustion engine applications.

 

Los Alamos scientist Louis Rosocha and his team have been working on the technology for about four years, with the goal of making fuel-efficient or cleaner burning engines through more complete combustion. The technology consists of an electronic device that can be attached to an existing fuel injector that applies electrical voltage to the atomized fuel stream prior to combustion - generating a plasma in the fuel. This effect essentially breaks down the long chains of hydrocarbons in the fuel into smaller parts - allowing the fuel to be burned more completely, resulting in more miles per gallon, or reducing harmful emissions.

 

"The research was really driven by market needs," said Rosocha. "In 2004, regulations were announced about air pollutants by all vehicles. In the future, air pollutants by vehicles, on- and off-road, are supposed to be more highly regulated. We knew that this was going to create a great opportunity to develop a technology that would supply the demand for cleaner burning vehicles. So, we decided to see if we could do something about it."

 

With fuel prices at all-time highs, the need for better fuel efficiency is also market driven, but the technology is limited. "The technology does produce cleaner emissions, and can lead to better fuel efficiency, but probably not at the same time," said Rosocha. "Maybe if Mother Nature was super-kind you might get both."

 

PerriQuest founder and CEO, Nicholas V. Perricone said that his company, which routinely works with the U.S. Government on defense technologies, is dedicated to turning the plasma combustion technology into a commercial product that will improve turbine and internal combustion engines.

 

"We knew we wanted to work with Los Alamos because, not only are their scientists world-renowned, they also have some of the best plasma technologies in the world we already have and hope to commercialize the plasma combustion technology for fuel efficiency and reduced pollutants for the American public."

 

PerriQuest is dedicated to the creation, development and timely deployment of advanced, cost-effective biological, chemical and electronic technologies that will protect and defend the American public and our military forces from existing and emerging global threats. PerriQuest is focused on aerospace applications, as well as on specific technologies for the military to enhance their war fighting capabilities and effectiveness. For more information on PerriQuest contact Brian Keller, [email protected]

 

Source: Los Alamos National Laboratory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the reason for not getting both increased fuel efficiency and decreased emissions is that the decreased emissions go into burning off the extra fuel that would otherwise be lost?

 

Plasma fuel injectors take extra energy to run. That extra energy comes from the increased burn of the fuel. This means that you don't go any further on the gas you have, but you do pollute a little less.

 

Well it doesn't sound like a bad thing, but how much more will it cost? Will it help keep the injectors clean, or will we have to clean them more often? Will we have to buy higher octane fuel with these tech advancements?

 

Novel idea fellows but I don't know if you can sell it, unless your government pals tell consumers they have to via regulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...