Jump to content
Science Forums

Teraforming Mars


ryan2006

Recommended Posts

That is quite an expectation. Considering it will have taken us fifty years to move from our first suite of landings on the moon, to our second.

Not to mention the current absence of any effective nanotechnology devices.

 

How do you envisage these nanobots will create the atmosphere? What composition do you envisage for the atmosphere? How do you plan to source the organic material for the soils?

 

I am not disputing that one day we will have the capacity to Terraform Mars. Conventional wisdom says this would take several hundred, possibly even a few thousand, years. At heart, the root of all my questions is, what makes you believe it is possible in a fraction of that time, and in the immediate future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hm? What are you trying to point out? Just a predicition? I am confused, why nanocomputers? We have that now, I like the idea from ... I forgot which movie, fill the Mars will algea or something like that. That would probably work if it it wasn't for the ever so weakening gravity and without it the atmopshere won't last.

 

Say, will melting the mars ice caps be a bad idea? Is the soil there even usuable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hm? What are you trying to point out? Just a predicition? I am confused, why nanocomputers? We have that now, I like the idea from ... I forgot which movie, fill the Mars will algea or something like that. That would probably work if it it wasn't for the ever so weakening gravity and without it the atmopshere won't last.

 

Say, will melting the mars ice caps be a bad idea? Is the soil there even usuable?

Weakening gravity?

 

The problems I see are the fact that there is no electromagnetic field to speak of on Mars to protect from solar radiation. You need enough mass to build an atmosphere that is sustainable. And you need to deal with the fact that it is so freaking desolate, and not getting any better. Unless there are large underground deposits of water, oxygen and nitrogen that can be used to create a working sustainable habitable atmosphere the whole deal is probably hopeless.

 

Blue sky on mars? First you need a total recall of its past resources that have likely evaporated into space.

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C**p. I can not believe I made that mistake. Thanks for pointing it out, yes weakning eletromagnetic field, it has one, it dieing out (Discovery Channel, I don't remember details, ask them, not me or google, I can be totally wrong, seems I am not thinking right today...). But wait, I did say its getting worse not better, what are you talking about?? Blue skies? I never mentioned that, no one did. I am confused, what are you refering to? . . .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the lack of public and political support of space exploration and colonisation, we'll be lucky to see a manned mission within 50 years. A full-scale terraformation of Mars is not to be expected before that, and not very soon after the first landing. To terraform a planet will require planning and detailed exploration of the planet, advanced simulation models, etc., not to mention public support and resources to which only a more mature interplanetary civilisation would have access.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...