Doron Shadmi Posted October 9, 2005 Report Share Posted October 9, 2005 Connectivity or integration is the property that is recognized by us as time or correlation among different entities. A time-line of some universe is the most connected state where no discrete phenomenon exists and all we have is a smooth connectivity without space (no measured place). Non-connectivity or differentiation is the property that is recognized by us as space or non-correlation among different entities. A space of some universe is the most disconnected state where no smooth phenomenon exists and all we have is discreteness without time (timing) or correlation (no measured flow). Our universe is both time_AND_space and this complementary relation can be found in any researched level within and without us. A cone and a sphere are two separated models of a universe, where a sphere is a closed universe (has "start", "middle" and "end" along a time-line) and a cone is an open universe (has "start" but no "middle" and no "end" along a time-line). A time-line in both models is like the “spine” of a universe, where any space/time phenomena are changed relatively to it. Space/Time is a complementary fading transition between “pure” time (the time-line) and “pure” space (the surface). In other words, time and space are the polarities of the same phenomena, called universe, that most of its history exists in its complementary space/time environment that has common “laws of nature” determined by the time-line, which is actually the attractor of a universe. This time-line can be a single time-line, which is the attractor of a single universe (closed or open): Also a time-line can be a one branch that belongs to a tree-like attractor that may have a fractal-like property: This diagram was taken from Andri Linde's work ( http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od172/cosfig1.htm ) and it is: "A graphical representation of the multiple inflationary bubbles of Andrei Linde's "self-reproducing inflationary universe". Linde's theory is one attempt to generate a "world ensemble," or ensemble of varying universes -- within a larger Universe -- in which the physical laws and properties may differ from one universe to the next. Changes in shading represent "mutations" in basic physical properties from "parent" to "offspring" universes. (Figure after Andrei Linde, "The Self-Reproducing Inflationary Universe, " Scientific American 271 [November 1994]; p.55.)" A Cybernetic curve: If we produce a cross-section end examine an arbitrary slice of a universe, which its space/time fabric is the result of integration/differentiation tendencies between “pure” time and “pure” space, then a natural equilibrium between these “purities” , has the shape of an Archimedean-like curve, for example: This Archimedean-like curve is maybe the optimal zone where complex phenomena like life, for example, can find a stable and rich enough conditions in order to be developed to a self aware non-trivial system. For more details please look at: Organic Natural Numbers and Cybernetic Kernels: http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/MonadCK.pdf Organic Natural Numbers: http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/ONN1.pdf http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/ONN2.pdf http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/ONN3.pdf This topic expending the wave-particle duality to a whole universe, where a universe is a complementary phenomenon that exists between two opposite properties, which are integration and differentiation. Integration is understood as gravity and differentiation is understood as expansion. The most integrated state is understood as the 4D which is time or time-line. The rest 3 dimensions are the observed space, which is ordered relatively to the time-line that is considered as its attractor. So the history of a universe is the story of space/time complementary associations along the time-line. Without this time-line, no fundamental conditions can appear as natural laws of a universe. By this model we can examine the idea of rich enough conditions in the space/time fabric, that maybe explains the origin and development of life phenomena along the time-line. The next part of this research is to use the insights coming from Quantum-Mechanics, in order to develop a new fundamental mathematical language where Redundancy and Uncertainty are first-order properties of its axiomatic system. By doing this, we actually re-examine the whole scientific cosmological research in a new light, where the researcher himself is both observer_AND_participator. From this point of view any result in any level (and not just in QM level) is influenced by the researcher, and the researcher has to include this influence as an inseparable part of his results. By using the word 'result' we mean that by this model, ethical results must also be considered as an organic part of the scientific research and development, where 'development' has two legs which are our technical skills and our ethical skills, which are combined to a one comprehensive scientific method, that can help us to survive the power of our developed technology along the time-line. For further information please look at: http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/LPD.pdf http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/Eventors.pdf http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/GEProject.pdf Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qfwfq Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Are you proposing these as opinions of your own, and a few others, or are you stating them as fact? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doron Shadmi Posted October 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 Are you proposing these as opinions of your own, and a few others, or are you stating them as fact?Hi Qfwfq, This work is the result of my own research for the past 25 years, and generally it is based on the Symmetry concept as the main principle of a lot of natural phenomena in what is called “The universe”. According to this approach, our consciousness is a natural phenomena as well, and can be defined in terms of symmetrical degrees that can be found as associations between Continuum and Discreteness states. By using Continuum/Discreteness associations in terms of Symmetry, I define the possible foundations that maybe are the natural gateways (a one organic realm) between what is called “The abstract universe of our mind” and what is called “The physical universe of laws of nature”. No theory is the thing itself, exactly as talking about silence is not the silence itself, and in my opinion, there is always a gap between reality and theory that can never be closed, and this gap is the natural environment where creatures like us are developed. Some dialogs about these ideas can be found in <link removed> and in these dialogs, our own consciousness is one of the main subjects of the research itself. An overview of my system can be found in <link removed> . I'll be glade to know your remarks about these ideas, thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qfwfq Posted October 10, 2005 Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 You seem to already have a place to discuss your ideas and you appear to be trying to usher people into it. Hypography is not here for this purpose, it's for discuusing things here. Here is an excerpt from "Linking to other sites" in the rules of this site: http://hypography.com/forums/?page=rules The only type of linking (besides porn, pyramid schemes, hateful sites, and spam, of course) that will not be allowed on our site is when members solicit people to leave our site and join a competing service. That's just common sense. We won't allow people to use our site to promote a competing service any more than a brick-and-mortar store would allow his competitor to paste flyers all over his walls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doron Shadmi Posted October 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 You seem to already have a place to discuss your ideas and you appear to be trying to usher people into it. Hypography is not here for this purpose, it's for discuusing things here. Here is an excerpt from "Linking to other sites" in the rules of this site: http://hypography.com/forums/?page=rules The only type of linking (besides porn, pyramid schemes, hateful sites, and spam, of course) that will not be allowed on our site is when members solicit people to leave our site and join a competing service. That's just common sense. We won't allow people to use our site to promote a competing service any more than a brick-and-mortar store would allow his competitor to paste flyers all over his walls.Hi Qfwfq, I did not come here in order to grab members into my site, but to discus about my ideas only within this forum, please believe me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doron Shadmi Posted October 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted October 10, 2005 More details of my work can be seen in: http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/TAP.pdf http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/My-first-axioms.pdf http://www.geocities.com/complementarytheory/SegPoint.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doron Shadmi Posted November 23, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 23, 2005 Does anyone have something to say about the subject of this thread? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.