Jump to content
Science Forums

Synthetic Particle Confinement Synthesis


Recommended Posts

I have been doing some thought about making synthetic composite particles and how that would be done, I have come to conclusion about this, I thought about this differently, the Strong Nuclear Force Confines Quarks that binds them like superglue in Color Confinement (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_confinement and http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Particles/qbag.html), If the Strong Nuclear Force put a repulsive/binding force upon quarks, why can that not be done synthetically using other forces allowing the creation of higher tier level particles that are made of particles artificially confined using a field that simulates the Strong Nuclear Force's repulsive/binding nature on particles such as Magnetic Confinement commonly used in fusion reactions.


An example of a Strong Nuclear Force confined composite particle being "Omega particles"



Using synthetic confinement of particles I think it would be possible to create higher order quarks than those in nature as the magnetic confinement would put additional pressure on the quarks keeping them from decaying and cohesive beyond what the Strong Nuclear Force would generally allow with it's strength, this additional pressure on the quarks keeping them stable. Possibly allowing for the creation of higher order composite particles such as other Pentaquarks.




The actual confinement in magnetic fields that stabilize the particles could happen in magnetic fields that are being used currently for fusion reactors allowing for a pressure to be placed upon the particles making a secondary bond between particles supporting their increased mass.




Note: If this does work then the particles can never leave confinement otherwise they will destabilize into energy.



It is like a oxygen tank, an oxygen tank can only hold so much oxygen before it will explode from the pressure but if you make the oxygen tank thicker, the tank can handle more pressure but in this instance, the oxygen is energy and the tank thickness is the additional confinement that holds the particle together by magnetic confinement increasing the "Thickness" of the Strong Nuclear Force or binding energy.




This can be explained by the simple equation PSpin = PSNF + PMagnetic

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I think that the "Red Matter" quantum substrate could be used as a efficient fuel for Antimatter Powered Spacecraft(https://science.howstuffworks.com/antimatter.htm) instead of creating a antimatter particle and normal matter pair we can instead confine the quarks into the fuel for usage in our spacecraft. The applications of such a easy to create storage method for energy is drastic and I think would be worth billions and trillions of dollars if actually manufactured for usage in Antimatter Powered Spacecraft(https://science.howstuffworks.com/antimatter.htm) with a energy content of 344 Gev per particle it would be much better than positrons or anti-hydrogen production which have a content of 511 Kev and 938 Mev.

What is the energy of positron?
"From direct interaction or after the formation of a transient system with an electron known as positronium, two photons, each of energy 511 keV (the rest mass energy of the electron or positron), are emitted in opposite directions with the disappearance (annihilation) of both particles."


Why is antihydrogen so expensive?
"Why are the costs so high? The reason for antimatter's tremendous expense is easy to understand when you realize the technology involved in creating it. To make antihydrogen, the required antiprotons must be literally made one atom at a time using a particle accelerator."
This is the reason why I think "Red Matter" Pentaquarks would be a excellent fuel source to be used instead of antimatter for antimatter powered spacecraft.
Edited by Vmedvil2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I finally have an equation taken from the particle box equation for my patented synthetic particle confinement synthesis method for "Red Matter" if the particle is the size of a proton with a L value of 0.87×1015 meters with a quantum state rest state of n = 1 and an energy of red matter of 5.5115*10^-8 joules or 344 Gev or 6.1318144589115*10^-25 kg as a m value then the En value to stabilize the particle is 1.0287400373331713738029709826257*10^-13 joules or 642.08905548008147161 Kev @ 0.87×1015  radius in meters or 1,181.609 Newtons or 1.1824598130266337629919206696847*10^32 J/m^3 of confinement by a magnetic field and strong nuclear force.


The "Red Matter" particles have a charge of +1 or -1 thus to achieve the energy density of 1.1824598130266337629919206696847*10^32 J/m^3 or force of 1,181.609 Newtons for the synthesis of the particles would require a magnetic field of 642,495 Teslas per meter @ 0.00183908045977011494252873563218 Columbs per second of current in the quark-Gluon plasma containing the quarks for "Red Matter". If the quark gluon plasma were flowing at 39.1921 Columbs per second or 21,417.43 meters per second of velocity, then with current superconductors of 30 Teslas per meter the synthesis would be possible.

Link = Magnetic forces (gsu.edu)

Edited by Vmedvil5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 10/16/2022 at 1:09 PM, JeffreysTubes8 said:

The best way to synthesize particles is a particle accelerator

This is true however I am trying to synthesize particles that cannot be stabilized into existence by just using a particle accelerator. They are unnatural particles that the strong nuclear force usually wouldn't bind however the constituent quarks are made via particle accelerators such as Top, anti-Top, and etc. Link = Top quark - Wikipedia

"Like all other quarks, the top quark is a fermion with spin 1/2 and participates in all four fundamental interactions: gravitation, electromagnetism, weak interactions, and strong interactions. It has an electric charge of +2/3 e. It has a mass of 172.76±0.3 GeV/c2,[1] which is close to the rhenium atom mass.[4] The antiparticle of the top quark is the top antiquark (symbol: t, sometimes called antitop quark or simply antitop), which differs from it only in that some of its properties have equal magnitude but opposite sign.

The top quark interacts with gluons of the strong interaction and is typically produced in hadron colliders via this interaction. However, once produced, the top (or antitop) can decay only through the weak force. It decays to a W boson and either a bottom quark (most frequently), a strange quark, or, on the rarest of occasions, a down quark.

The Standard Model determines the top quark's mean lifetime to be roughly 5×10−25 s.[5] This is about a twentieth of the timescale for strong interactions, and therefore it does not form hadrons, giving physicists a unique opportunity to study a "bare" quark (all other quarks hadronize, meaning that they combine with other quarks to form hadrons and can only be observed as such)."

These have considerably more energy than even omega particles, these "Red Matter" particles by about 215 times the energy trump the omega particles. They are not in any way stable without using the magnetic confinement process. The Strong Nuclear Force isn't strong enough to bind particles with this much mass.

"As its name suggests, the strong force is the strongest—it's 100 times stronger than the electromagnetic force (which binds electrons into atoms), 10,000 times stronger than the weak force (which governs radioactive decay), and a hundred million million million million million million (1039) times stronger than gravity"

By doubling up the electromagnetic force the second most powerful with the strong nuclear force the first most powerful only then is synthesis of "Red Matter" particles possible. The principal is similar to nuclear fusion with enough confinement and heat you can force particles together like this; however, this is more of a "Quantum Fusion". 


These particles are made from Quark Gluon Plasma of Top Quarks and various other particles shown in the particle diagram which needs to be confined into the "Red Matter" particles which requires higher field strengths than nuclear fusion.

"How is quark-gluon plasma made?

In these heavy-ion collisions the hundreds of protons and neutrons in two such nuclei smash into one another at energies of upwards of a few trillion electronvolts each. This forms a miniscule fireball in which everything “melts” into a quark-gluon plasma."




Edited by Vmedvil5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

This is now patented by West Nanorobotics LLC until 2043, the opportunity to steal and use Synthetic Particle Confinement Synthesis, Red Matter Quantum Substrates, or Neutronium Quantum Substrates has ended.

Neutronium Quantum Substrate Particle Diagram




Edited by Vmedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...