Jump to content
Science Forums

Settled Science.


Moronium
 Share

Recommended Posts

I posted some comments on a recent climate-related study but for some ignorant reason put in the "engineering and applied sciences" category (which most posters seem to ignore).  I never even noticed his forum, which would have been much more appropriate.

 

It's the kind of topic that usually generates some "interest" (often of the highly emotionally charged variety), so I thought I'd call some attention to it here, too, just in case anybody else has some comments.

 

http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/35053-how-can-you-improve-on-settled-science/?do=findComment&comment=367765

Edited by Moronium
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://variable-variability.blogspot.com/2014/05/resignation-lennart-bengtsson.html

 

He says his colleagues are evil!

 

And he's recanted his position. Which of the 5 would be your own personal favourite denier?  It seems that the only way to come to some sort of conclusion on the question being posed on this thread would be to examine the credibility of the deniers. 

 

The 15 listed are the experts, not us, and so we need to have some standard on which to judge them. Bengtsson has recanted, for whatever reason? And when he says his colleagues are evil, that leads to suspicions of lack of credibility. 

 

Can you promote one of the remaining 4 that we can investigate and then use to establish credibility?

Edited by montgomery
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
  • 4 months later...

http://variable-variability.blogspot.com/2014/05/resignation-lennart-bengtsson.html

 

He says his colleagues are evil!

 

And he's recanted his position. Which of the 5 would be your own personal favourite denier?  It seems that the only way to come to some sort of conclusion on the question being posed on this thread would be to examine the credibility of the deniers. 

 

The 15 listed are the experts, not us, and so we need to have some standard on which to judge them. Bengtsson has recanted, for whatever reason? And when he says his colleagues are evil, that leads to suspicions of lack of credibility. 

 

Can you promote one of the remaining 4 that we can investigate and then use to establish credibility?

hello im a newbie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...