Jump to content
Science Forums

The Truth About Geometric Unity


sevensixtwo

Recommended Posts

Many of us read the recent Guardian articles by Marcus du Sautoy and Alok Jha that described a potential new 14D geometric theory of everything. Unlike most such theories, Geometric Unity has a unique experimental prediction that can verify it or rule it out. CERN is capable of making this measurement with existing equipment. The physics community has been unable to judge the claims directly since they are looking for papers by Weinstein, and there are none. In fact, the theory was developed by another author and Weinstein's contribution has been to popularize the ideas.

 

This article is non-scientific and outlines the development and prominent features of Geometric Unity.

The Truth About Geometric Unity

 

A new interpretation of time leads to a connection between GR and QM. Einstein's equations and the fine structure constant derived from one simple principle.

Tempus Edax Rerum

 

The 14D geometric model is presented in detail. A flaw in the ADM positive-definiteness theorem is identified. A major outstanding issue in Kaluza theory is resolved.

Geometric Cosmology

 

The standard model of particle physics is shown to be a geometric property of the Geometric Unity cosmology. A unique experimental prediction is made.

Quantum Structure

 

The features of the theory are treated in a technical, yet qualitative way. A solution to dark energy is proposed.

Dark Energy in M-Theory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone help a non-mathematical brother out?

 

My understanding of String Theory—There are several competing versions.

 

Presumably they can't all be right.

 

None of them have been completely "Solved" in a Mathematical Sense to see if they are Internally Consistant.

 

Some scoff. They say that the Various "String Theories" Are Not "Scientific Theories" because they offer no Testable Hypothesis (yet...)

 

And IF Your Article are Correct, the "Testable" part is about to Change.

 

Help me Understand:

 

WHAT is Incomplete?

 

How can you run around with "Half" or "Four-Fifths" of a Mathematical String Theory ???

 

Maybe we Knead a "Bone" Theory or a "Rock" Theory...

 

"Rock and Roll"? :blink:

 

 

 

 

Saxon Violence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now here are five 10D strings theories. There is wide speculation that those theories are just specific cases of a more fundamental concept. I have constructed a previously unconsidered geometry and offered it as a candidate for the as-yet-unknown conceptual component of string theory.

 

Yes, the new theory is able to push past the limits of string theory and make a legitimate experimental prediction. From what I understand, CERN has already taken the data needed to test the prediction but they have not yet published such an analysis. Hopefully it it will be forthcoming but I suppose it is possible that such an analysis will not appear until after the machine is restarted in 2015.

 

Thanks for your interest, let me know if you have any other questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...