Jump to content
Science Forums

Is This a Loony Conspiracy Theory or True?


Recommended Posts

US Gives China Eminent Domain Over US Property - Beyond High Treason(updated)

Posted by sakerfa on February 28, 2009

. . . .

. . .

 

 

Dot #13 China agrees to continue investing in U.S. Treasury Bills only after securing the right of “eminent domain” to physically repossess foreclosed American PRIVATE PROPERTY.

This move is the equivalent of an unconditional surrender following a bloody war.

This also gives the Chinese military the LEGAL RIGHT to use biological weaponry to “Clean up America all at once”. It gives them the legal right to use deadly force in removing trespassing Americans from occupying Chinese real estate.

 

Connect these 13 evil dots, and this is what you get:

 

FEDS GRANT EMINENT DOMAIN AS COLLATERAL TO CHINA FOR U.S. DEBTS

 

BEIJING, China — Sources at the United States Embassy in Beijing China have just CONFIRMED that the United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People’s Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China’s continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves.

 

The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip to China.

 

This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take — inside the USA — land, buildings, factories, perhaps even entire cities - to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.

 

Put simply, the feds have now actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States.

They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to “take” all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.

US Gives China Eminent Domain Over US Property - Beyond High Treason(updated) Dprogram.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s source, dprogram.net, is a loony conspiracy website, one of may that promotes the claim that the 9/11/2001 collapse of the 2 World Trade Center towers and other buildings was not the result of fire from the two 767 airliners that struck them, but demolition charges and US military missiles, done as a “false flag” to win public favor for subsequent actions by the US government and businesses. As claims of these sorts have been discredited to the satisfaction of all but the looniest conspiracy advocates, I don’t credit any information coming from dprogram.net.

 

Michealangelica, I believe you’ve discovered yet another small patch of the large, ugly underbelly of America, its small but passionately intense community of, IMHO mentally ill people believe practically anything that supports their delusional view that they are the disenfranchised victims of vast conspiracies by the worlds rich and powerful. Despite being offensive to most and hazardous to the mental health of a few, we Americans must allow it to be made, because our laws recognize the importance of not forbidding speech of any kind that is not a clear attempt to harm others (ie: “shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theatre”).

 

I recommend everyone not give the claims of this and sites like it serious consideration, studying them only to gain an understanding of the psychological and sociological dysfunction underlying them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yellow journalism has a long and proud history in our country. Increasingly easier communication makes it increasingly more easy for people to traffic in all ideas, crackpot or otherwise. Basic education should provide an inoculation against such idiocy, but unfortunately, as a country we are more obsessed with standardized tests than logical thinking.

 

The "fire in a crowded theater" reference is from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. in a landmark case about free speech.

the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic.source
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...