freeztar Posted April 17, 2007 Report Share Posted April 17, 2007 I thought this was pretty neat:Aphex Faceand a wiki:Spectrogram - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Has anyone tried this? If so, what image did you use and how? I might try to do this in some future works. :) I pose this question: How could the two be fused into a duet of art? In other words, how can the images change within the spectrogram while still retaining sonic beauty? It would be like embedded video with no extra space taken up. :hyper:I wonder, could ultra sonic frequencies could be used for the video part?Hmmmm.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeztar Posted May 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 Nobody finds this interesting?I figured that at least one person would challenge my claim that no extra space would be taken up by using ultra-sonic frequencies to convey images. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormod Posted May 22, 2007 Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 I think it's interesting! Duh! I just don't bother responding to your silly posts. :evil: Seriously, I don't think I fully understood the questions. Care to elaborate? I do remember using images in FL Studio's Beatmapper but that's something else entirely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeztar Posted May 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 The first link was bad, so try it again and I think you will get the picture (pun intended). :evil: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormod Posted May 22, 2007 Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 It's cool. At present more of a gimmick, though. I guess it wouldn't really take up that much space in the frequency spectrum so it's not *that* different from embedding copyright information in photos etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeztar Posted May 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 Exactly.I do agree that it is a gimmick, but is that the extent of this or can it be tapped further? Why do mp3 tags embed with more kb used? Couldn't this info be stored as ultrasonic data? Would this result in a net loss of storage consumption? Or would it be tit for tat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormod Posted May 22, 2007 Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 The MP3 info could probably be stored sonically, but it would require that all mp3 players get new firmware (at least) so I guess we could maybe expect it in a later generation of players. However, wouldn't be more difficult to edit the data though? The PC would have to decode the info, let you edit it, and then recode the song again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeztar Posted May 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 However, wouldn't be more difficult to edit the data though? The PC would have to decode the info, let you edit it, and then recode the song again! That's a good point and I don't see any way around that unfortunately. :car: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormod Posted May 22, 2007 Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 That's a good point and I don't see any way around that unfortunately. :car: I am sure they have a fix for this in Linux. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.