Jump to content


Photo
* - - - - 1 votes

Australian Data: Cancer Epidemic In Gardasil Girls


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Thoth101

Thoth101

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1203 posts

Posted 16 July 2020 - 04:43 AM

Still trust the vaccine industry? I seen this coming a long time ago.

 

Australian Data: Cancer Epidemic in Gardasil Girls | 14 July 2020 | The verdict is now inescapable: Gardasil is killing girls. The Australian government's cancer data show the dramatic rise in cervical cancer in young girls vaccinated with Gardasil. Merck markets Gardasil as a prophylactic against cervical cancers despite the company's own pre-licensing studies that showed a 44.6% INCREASE in cervical cancers among girls exposed to HPV virus prior to vaccination... Since 2007, all girls and women up to age 26 have been offered the HPV vaccine in Australia. Government numbers show a 16% cancer increase in 25-year-olds, a 28% increase in 30-year-olds, several years post vaccination. The 30-year-old's rate increased from 5.4/100k to 6.9/100k. The 25- year-old's rate rose ‪from 3.2 to 3.7 per 100k.

 

https://legitgov.org...-gardasil-girls

 

Also see:

https://childrenshea...gardasil-girls/

 

https://changingtime...pv-vaccination/

 

This is what nytimes said in 2018 yet we see the opposite:

https://www.nytimes....pv-vaccine.html

 

 

 

 



#2 montgomery

montgomery

    Suspended twice

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 584 posts

Posted 16 July 2020 - 10:27 AM

Still trust the vaccine industry? I seen this coming a long time ago.

 

Australian Data: Cancer Epidemic in Gardasil Girls | 14 July 2020 | The verdict is now inescapable: Gardasil is killing girls. The Australian government's cancer data show the dramatic rise in cervical cancer in young girls vaccinated with Gardasil. Merck markets Gardasil as a prophylactic against cervical cancers despite the company's own pre-licensing studies that showed a 44.6% INCREASE in cervical cancers among girls exposed to HPV virus prior to vaccination... Since 2007, all girls and women up to age 26 have been offered the HPV vaccine in Australia. Government numbers show a 16% cancer increase in 25-year-olds, a 28% increase in 30-year-olds, several years post vaccination. The 30-year-old's rate increased from 5.4/100k to 6.9/100k. The 25- year-old's rate rose ‪from 3.2 to 3.7 per 100k.

 

https://legitgov.org...-gardasil-girls

 

Also see:

https://childrenshea...gardasil-girls/

 

https://changingtime...pv-vaccination/

 

This is what nytimes said in 2018 yet we see the opposite:

https://www.nytimes....pv-vaccine.html

We can't just accept this as true Thoth because of your track record of posting links to conspiracy theory sited. Regardless of what you 'SEE'D' coming.

 

Who are 'Children's Heatlh Defense'?

 

Oh, I see they are ANTI-VAXXERS again!

 

https://www.acsh.org...onspiracy-14681

 

Here's what that org says:

 

Children's Health Defense says governments and corporations are using the coronavirus (SARS-COV-2) to advance a "global immunization agenda." The anti-vaccine group claims that our leaders just needed the right pandemic as a pretext to goad us into getting vaccines. This is a clever story. It's also false.

 

I would say the jury's still out on Children's Health Defense Thoth. Dohhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

 

Do you have any more reliable sources for your ANTI-VAXXER theory?

 

For this particular one, I would look to some Christian orgs that say HPV vaxxs promote promiscuous behaviour ini little girls! 

 

You wrote:

Still trust the vaccine industry? I seen this coming a long time ago.

 

You probably see'd my answer coming too! 



#3 Thoth101

Thoth101

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1203 posts

Posted 16 July 2020 - 10:41 PM

We can't just accept this as true Thoth because of your track record of posting links to conspiracy theory sited. Regardless of what you 'SEE'D' coming.

 

Who are 'Children's Heatlh Defense'?

 

Oh, I see they are ANTI-VAXXERS again!

 

https://www.acsh.org...onspiracy-14681

 

Here's what that org says:

 

 

 

 

I would say the jury's still out on Children's Health Defense Thoth. Dohhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

 

Do you have any more reliable sources for your ANTI-VAXXER theory?

 

For this particular one, I would look to some Christian orgs that say HPV vaxxs promote promiscuous behaviour ini little girls! 

 

You wrote:

 

 

You probably see'd my answer coming too! 

My track record is pretty good. You seem to be the one that is confused most of the time. Will I say I am 100 percent correct all the time? No! And no one is. But I am for sure a lot more knowledgeable and informed then you even on your best day.

 

From all the research I have seen I have a lot more faith in what you call the Anti-Vaxxers then the fraudulent Big Pharma Cartel medical system. I would place my money on someone who actually does research then someone who promotes propaganda to sell a drug or a vaccine. You seem to be in the propaganda business yourself. Are or you just that mind controlled?



#4 LaurieAG

LaurieAG

    Explaining

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1580 posts

Posted 17 July 2020 - 12:42 AM

Government numbers show a 16% cancer increase in 25-year-olds, a 28% increase in 30-year-olds, several years post vaccination. The 30-year-old's rate increased from 5.4/100k to 6.9/100k. The 25- year-old's rate rose ‪from 3.2 to 3.7 per 100k.

 

What settings did you use for your 44.6% increase? i.e. year ranges and comparison years 20?? and 2020.



#5 Thoth101

Thoth101

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1203 posts

Posted 17 July 2020 - 03:08 AM

What settings did you use for your 44.6% increase? i.e. year ranges and comparison years 20?? and 2020.

That is a great question:

 

Use this chart: You just put in the inputs.

https://www.aihw.gov...a-visualisation

 

Also if you re-read:

 Merck markets Gardasil as a prophylactic against cervical cancers despite the company's own pre-licensing studies that showed a 44.6% INCREASE in cervical cancers

 

All the info and links is on that right here:

https://www.informed...nd-other-facts/



#6 montgomery

montgomery

    Suspended twice

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 584 posts

Posted 17 July 2020 - 10:23 AM

That is a great question:

 

Use this chart: You just put in the inputs.

https://www.aihw.gov...a-visualisation

 

Also if you re-read:

 Merck markets Gardasil as a prophylactic against cervical cancers despite the company's own pre-licensing studies that showed a 44.6% INCREASE in cervical cancers

 

All the info and links is on that right here:

https://www.informed...nd-other-facts/

Be kind to Laurie, she just might buy into this new 'monsanto' you're trying to start on the gardasil thingy.

In my opinion, this could be one that qualifes as a 'santorum'.



#7 Thoth101

Thoth101

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1203 posts

Posted 17 July 2020 - 09:53 PM

Be kind to Laurie, she just might buy into this new 'monsanto' you're trying to start on the gardasil thingy.

In my opinion, this could be one that qualifes as a 'santorum'.

I think Laurie might be offended you called him a female. Gosh you really don't read do you? :lol:



#8 LaurieAG

LaurieAG

    Explaining

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1580 posts

Posted 18 July 2020 - 12:42 AM

Thoth101, nowhere in any of the links in your OP show how they get the 44.6% increase.

 

The Gardasil pdf doesn't mention 44.6% anywhere either.

 

p.s. You can usually tell where people come from when they don't consider 'Laurie' as a blokes name.



#9 Thoth101

Thoth101

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1203 posts

Posted 18 July 2020 - 01:00 AM

Thoth101, nowhere in any of the links in your OP show how they get the 44.6% increase.

 

The Gardasil pdf doesn't mention 44.6% anywhere either.

 

p.s. You can usually tell where people come from when they don't consider 'Laurie' as a blokes name.

Merck probebly got it scrubbed from the internet. Try using Duckduckgogo you may have a better chance of finding it. Or a waybackmachine.

 

I found this petition with a plethora of links. It is possible it is in there if it hasn't been scrubbed from the internet.

https://sboh.wa.gov/...nts-Packet7.pdf

 

This link should have it.

https://sanevax.org/...ardasil-trials/

 

Gardasil Vaccine Clinical Trial Investigation

This open letter, written on behalf of medical consumers around the world, is an urgent request for you to investigate potential malfeasance perpetrated by Merck during their clinical trials of Gardasil, the human papillomavirus vaccine that the FDA approved in June 2006. A new book, The HPV Vaccine on Trial: Seeking Justice for a Generation Betrayed, by Holland, Rosenberg, and Iorio, outlines at least four areas requiring the FDA’s urgent attention. (A copy has been sent to you under separate cover.)


Edited by Thoth101, 18 July 2020 - 01:04 AM.


#10 montgomery

montgomery

    Suspended twice

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 584 posts

Posted 18 July 2020 - 09:52 AM

Merck probebly got it scrubbed from the internet. Try using Duckduckgogo you may have a better chance of finding it. Or a waybackmachine.

 

I found this petition with a plethora of links. It is possible it is in there if it hasn't been scrubbed from the internet.

https://sboh.wa.gov/...nts-Packet7.pdf

 

This link should have it.

https://sanevax.org/...ardasil-trials/

 

Gardasil Vaccine Clinical Trial Investigation

This open letter, written on behalf of medical consumers around the world, is an urgent request for you to investigate potential malfeasance perpetrated by Merck during their clinical trials of Gardasil, the human papillomavirus vaccine that the FDA approved in June 2006. A new book, The HPV Vaccine on Trial: Seeking Justice for a Generation Betrayed, by Holland, Rosenberg, and Iorio, outlines at least four areas requiring the FDA’s urgent attention. (A copy has been sent to you under separate cover.)

You're one of the anti-vaxxers and this nonsense fits that particular 'monsanto'. And you're a Trumper so that's the reason why you think Fauci is a liar. But there's more to what makes you tick than just those two examples. You're a follower of David Icke and you spend a huge amount of time reading his trashy 'monsantos' about the hollow moon, Lizard people, and even worse! 

 

Are there some clues in your early childhood or did something go horribly wrong when you were in the military. (if in fact you ever were?) I ask because the US military would likely have some psych tests they use to screen out the batshit crazy like you. If it cam after you signed up then if could be a clue to your weird behaviour.



#11 Thoth101

Thoth101

    Creating

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1203 posts

Posted 25 July 2020 - 10:12 PM

You're one of the anti-vaxxers and this nonsense fits that particular 'monsanto'. And you're a Trumper so that's the reason why you think Fauci is a liar. But there's more to what makes you tick than just those two examples. You're a follower of David Icke and you spend a huge amount of time reading his trashy 'monsantos' about the hollow moon, Lizard people, and even worse! 

 

Are there some clues in your early childhood or did something go horribly wrong when you were in the military. (if in fact you ever were?) I ask because the US military would likely have some psych tests they use to screen out the batshit crazy like you. If it cam after you signed up then if could be a clue to your weird behaviour.

I don't support any politicians. That is typical left wing paranoia though. They label anybody that does any kind of research a Trump supporter. Very foolish. Actually the military taught me how to research. One thing you fail to do.

 

 Lets take a look at the numbers.

 

Vaccine Market Valued at $93 Billion by 2026
by TVR Staff
Published December 26, 2019 | Business, Pharma
 
 
 

growth-701x370.jpg

A recent report by Fortune Business Insights projects the value of the world market for vaccines to reach $93.08 billion by 2026, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 10.7 percent during the forecast period.1

One of the main drivers of the vaccine market is the need for greater supplies of vaccines, given stricter government vaccination policies. Pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, international organizations and hospitals are becoming more focused on administering vaccines on a regular basis. In addition, government surveillance systems in many countries are driving

 

legislative mandates requiring more and more people to receive vaccines recommended by the state.1

An additional factor driving the vaccine market is a robust pipeline of products. Faced with increasing competition, vaccine manufacturers are under increasing market pressure to get licensure approvals for their products from regulatory agencies. Continuous research and development and launching novel vaccines in the market is the goal of every vaccine maker.

Rising global demand for vaccines against serious diseases such as malaria, dengue and Ebola is offering new business opportunities for many pharmaceutical companies such as Novavax, Inovio Pharmaceuticals and Bavarian Nordic that are among the top 10 firms expecting to have their vaccine products be approved for use in the next few years. Industry leaders GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Sanofi and Pfizer also have several vaccines under development that may eventually be licensed and contribute to growth of the vaccine market.1

 

Pediatric vaccines hold the highest market share in terms of value. The potential size of the pediatric vaccines market is largely dependent on two factors—worldwide growing birth cohort and increasing pediatric vaccination doses.1

In 2018, North America generated revenue of $22.03 billion from sales of vaccines and is anticipated to be the dominant revenue-generating continent in the vaccine market through 2026. The Fortune Business Insights report states that steady and dominant growth of the North American vaccines market is expected will be due to increasing vaccine awareness, the presence of strong manufacturers and stricter government public health policies.1

References:

  Bavarian Nordic, Ebola, Fortune Business Insights, GlaxoSmithKline, GSK, Inovio Pharmaceuticals, Merck, National Vaccine Information Center, North America, Novavax, NVIC, Pfizer, Rishma Parpia, Sanofi, The Vaccine Reaction, vaccine market

 

https://thevaccinere...illion-by-2026/


Edited by Thoth101, 25 July 2020 - 10:13 PM.