Lancewen Posted April 11, 2013 Report Share Posted April 11, 2013 This article expresses an opinion, but I'm not so sure they're right. Anybody else think they are getting it right? http://www.popsci.com/node/71294/?cmpid=enews041113&spPodID=020&spMailingID=5355991&spUserID=Mzc4MjM2OTY5NjIS1&spJobID=316566873&spReportId=MzE2NTY2ODczS0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted April 12, 2013 Report Share Posted April 12, 2013 If my understanding of it is correct then yes that is pretty much the way it would "feel". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lancewen Posted April 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2013 If my understanding of it is correct then yes that is pretty much the way it would "feel". They did compare going into warp with crossing an event horizon. Besides not having any data on doing either of these things, I find it very hard to have the slightest idea of how it might feel, and I don't believe anyone else is even remotely qualified to say one way or the other. So why do you agree with them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moontanman Posted April 12, 2013 Report Share Posted April 12, 2013 They did compare going into warp with crossing an event horizon. Besides not having any data on doing either of these things, I find it very hard to have the slightest idea of how it might feel, and I don't believe anyone else is even remotely qualified to say one way or the other. So why do you agree with them? No they compared leaving the warp field while it was generated to crossing an event horizon. It makes sense, if you are being accelerated along with space time you wouldn't feel the acceleration anymore than a falling object feels acceleration... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.