Hello Maddog, Let me make a small correction to your second post; bases are not amino acids, they are nucleotides. Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins, and chemically dissimilar to nucleotides. Three bases will code for a specific amino acid to be incorporated into a growing protein chain. The answer to your question is yes - scientists have been able to find alternative base pairs. A very good example is the 7-(2-thienyl)-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (Ds) and pyrrole-2-carbaldehyde (Pa) pair, published in Nature Methods in 2006. (Hirao, Ichiro, et al. "An unnatural hydrophobic base pair system: site-specific incorporation of nucleotide analogs into DNA and RNA." Nature Methods 3.9 (2006): 729-735.) This specific pair will not form hydrogen bonds with each other like the regular bases, but will rather pair through hydrophobic packing. You can find other examples in the literature. I am currently working (as an undergrad) in a lab with "unnatural" or "non-canonical" amino acids. We evolve the genetic machinery in ways that allow us to modify the genetic code so that we can genetically incorporate new amino acids not found in nature, giving new useful properties to proteins. It is not necessary to use new base pairs to do this, as we can simply "hijack" some of the codons (there are 64 codons, 61 code for 20 amino acids, 3 codons are "stop" codons, we usually hijack one of the three stop codons, the UAG). However, new base pairs will become very useful once the technology expands.