
buddha elämuni
Members-
Posts
45 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by buddha elämuni
-
Can energy of an atom nucleus/core change?
buddha elämuni replied to buddha elämuni's topic in Strange Claims Forum
Let´s think with a thought! Let´s think about the giant energy concentarions of our galaxies centres(they are also called as huge black holes) and how they once flaped from one size larger energy concentarions that locate really far outside the visible universe! This way they were already far away from each other and the space did not have to expand “inflantionally”. With time the stars were born out of the energy waves that the giant energy concentrations of the galaxy centres radiate and which have the nature of the atoms. At the same time as the substance and the time of this new substance were born, this energy moved in a space that already excisted and which does not expand or curve! Our time is extremely slow in relation to the speed of movement in which the substance / energy of the visible universe move in a space that already excists. And when the stars began to radiate their energy, the energy started to move as particules in an area between the galaxies ect. Now let´s think that energy of the visible universe would begin to meet corresponding galaxies in a 90 degree angle. Naturally towards those galaxies would hit energy coming from the stars of the visible universe. So this energy did not once move in an area between the galaxy “seeds”. In an area between the particules radiating from the stars does not move energy which could hit the particules passing the star! In an area whre the particules come towards the star this energy moves and it hits towards the photons passing the star and this is how the light bends! Energy concentarions orbit of movement changes, accelerates or slows down only when the energy of an energy concentration alters faster than normally in the other side than in the other into a less dense energy . The Velocity Let´s think about a ship that is one light second long and moves throuhg the whole visible universe nearly in a speed of light. The time of the ship is so slow that during that time only one second of the ships time passes by! How many journeys of the ships length does the ship move in one ships second? The oldest light of the visible universe has moved from the farest destination of the visible universe towards us and at the same time all the material / energy of the visible universe (also that oldest light) has been able to move during one of our seconds in a similar way as the ship that moved in one ships second truly many times the same journey as its own length is! Our time is simply so unthinkably slow in relation to that velocity in which all the material / energy of the visible universe moves in a space that allready excists. And of course the light that moves into a direction in which all the energy / material of the visible universe pushes itself, moves with a fastest speed into that same direction, may it be a hunch faster! . -
Can energy of an atom nucleus/core change?
buddha elämuni replied to buddha elämuni's topic in Strange Claims Forum
Dark Energy The energy does not interact with the space in anyway! The space does not alter in any way. The eternally excisting space does not expand, curve, roll, bang, stretch or foam! According to the onesimpleprinciple model there occures a lot of such energy that effects the energy of the atomcores and makes the energy in a core to expand in other words to alter with accelerating speed into a less dense energy. The atomcores absorb that energy also towards themselves. This is how the atomcores that expand all the time have enough energy to radiate the energy as waves and these waves have the nature of electrons and particules! The energy of a visible universe originates from the objects that exicist really far outiside the visible universe. Those objects explode and radiate energywaves that have the nature of galaxies. The galaxies are huge particules that explode and radiate energywaves that have the nature of atoms.The energy of all stars originare from enormeous energy consentrations of the galaxy centres! The galaxies come to existence from inside to outside in other words from the centre to outward. In the end all the energy of a visible universe has scattered smoothly in to a space. In some point the energy that has altered smooth begins to meet old galaxies and operates as so called dark energy in other words makes the energy of the galaxies that the energy meets to alter in an accelerating speed into a less dense energy ect. Also the galaxies of the visible universe meet smoothly into a slightly dence altered energy. This energy is remains of truly old galaxy energy. Is has moved through an enormeous emptiness within thousands of millions years. Within this time that energy has exploded in other words altered smoothly into a less dense energy in a eternal space that already exists. Every single qvark in a visible universe meets that energy equally smoothly all the time. In a moment the energy of a visible universe can move away from a space where the energy of a visible universe exists now and in a next moment away from a space where the energy of a visible universe just moved ect. I can just imagine how much the qvarks are all the time able to absorb themselves more energy from the energy that has scattered smoothly and moves against the energy of the visible universe. That energy flaps in a moment through the visible universe and it absorbs all the time energy to the qvarks of the visible universe. That is the so called dark energy that makes the substance to expand with an accelerating speed. It does not impact with the space in any way. The space does not expand, curve or roll! The density of an eternal energy varies in an eternal space that does not change in any way! You must forget all about expanding space. The expanding of a space can not be proven scientifically! And you can not make a scientific experiment with the space! The argument of an empty space is an empty argument. More empty than the argument of the guardian angels! . -
Can energy of an atom nucleus/core change?
buddha elämuni replied to buddha elämuni's topic in Strange Claims Forum
Hello Conan O Brien YouTube - Etimespace's Channel[/url] Hello Jim Carrey YouTube - Etimespace's Channel[/url] Hello Madonna YouTube - Etimespace's Channel[/url] Scientific experiments The argument about the expanding space is an empty argument! There is no way to make scientific experiments with a space. The argument about expanding space is not science. It is a religion! The thing that particules radiate their energy is not an empty claim. Particules can be examined and make scientifical experiment with them and this way proof this claim to be true. Let´s take long chutes from different materials into the space and place telescopes to them to observe some known place of a star. If the energy that comes to the chutes makes the photons moving in the chute to bend towards the chute, we can this way observe that this star concerned seems to be in a different place than it is known to be! The sun does not curve the space. The energy coming towards the sun makes photons passing by the sun to bend towards the sun, because the hot / thick, small and little exterior surface possessing particules do not interact with the photons passing by the sun! Even Einstein once told us that the massive the object is, the slower the time is. In relation to the size of a star there is much more energy / substance in the stars than in the photons. The substance / energy is denser in the stars than what it is in the photons. The time of the stars is so slower than the time of the photons! This way the time of the old photons is faster than the time of the new photons and the photons radiating from the stars do not tranfer their kinetic energy to the photons passing by the star as much as the photons coming towards the star do. This way the light bends at the same time it passes the star without supposedly the star would bend the space! -
Can energy of an atom nucleus/core change?
buddha elämuni replied to buddha elämuni's topic in Strange Claims Forum
I DEMAND LOGICALITY We need to expect even a little bit of logicality to the scientific theories. If I have understood correctly, according to the so called firm interaction the qvarks supposedly interact with each other the stronger the further the qvarks are from each other? The argument that the qvarks interact stronger when they are further away from each other is not logical nor scientifical. ”The gluons that moderate strong nuclear power have been observed in particle accelerators”. How does the gluon moderate the gravitation from one qvark to another? How does the gluon loosen from the qvark? Why does the gluon move towards another qvark? How does the gluon make the qvark that is impacted by a gluon to move itself to the same direction from where the gluon itself is coming? How does the gluon effect the qvark stronger if the qvark is further away from the qvark where the gluon started it´s journey? In fact the qvark explodes and causes internal pressure to the qvark and this pressure makes qvark to squeeze energy as waves that have the nature of gluons. One example of this theory we have in a shape of guns. The expanding qvarks have interaction with each other so to say push themselves away from each other the less the further the qvarks from each other are located. This happens because from the qvarks the waves moving forward like in a surface of a ball impact less waves to a qvark nearby when qvark nearby is located further and so on. So the expanding qvarks can not in any point push themselves away from each other so firmly that they would begin to move further away from each other faster than they expand. When the pushing decreases, relatively the expanding makes the qvarks to reach out for each other even though the qvarks don´t move towards each other. The gluon does not go to the next qvark and tell it to go in a direction where I just came.. No, the gluon impacts the qvark and makes the energy in that side of the qvark to alter faster into a less dense energy. With this energy the expanding qvark pushes itself away from that expanding qvark where the gluon came ect. One could assume that a scientifical theory would have even some kind of logicality! The theory of an firm interaction between qvarks is not logical, because the qvarks do not interact stronger with each other the further they are from each other. That´s a fact! The qvarks also absorb in other words fill up all the time more raw material (=energy) from where everything consits of. This way the recycling of an energy continues in a space that allready exists and does not alter in any ways! The atomcores that transform into a less dense energy control each others trasformation into a less dense energy with an energy that radiates from themselves. The stars that transform into a less dense energy control each others trasformation into a less dense energy with an energy that the stars radiate towards each other. The galaxies that transform into a less dense energy control each others trasformation into a less dense energy with an energy that the galaxies radiate towards each other. The groups of galaxies that transform into a less dense energy control each others trasformation into a less dense energy with an energy that they radiate towards each other. The particules (like photons and neutrinos) that transform into a less dense energy control each others transformation with and energy that the neutrinos and the photons radiate towards each other. The particules that transform into a less dense energy control the transformation of the atomcores that the particules radiate towards the atomcores. This way the omega is excactly one all the time! The space really does not curve or bend! The density of an eternal energy transforms in a ever lasting space that does not transform! -
About 13.8 billion years ago universe -as we see it - had its energy very densely formed. Nowadays the same energy is way more than less condensed. There is no reason to doubt that same phenomenon couldnt effect on the very same energy that the nucleus of an atom has! Nucleuses of atoms had accordingly changed for less dense energy. Concomitantly expanding atom nucleuses have radiated their energy in a form of waves which have nature of electrons and particles. Electrons confront energy-waves from the adjacent atom nucleuses and interact with them. At this point new electrons are born in to them which create changes of pressure into energy-waves that they confront etc. After the interaction electrons continue towards nucleus of an atom, make the nucleus explode their energy to that very same direction where that electron came. Because of that the expanding nucleus trembles to opposing direction and so forth. 2. All the time particles move through and past atom nucleuses which also change to less dense energy and radiate their energy in waves. Quarks ? fuel up? i.e. absorb this ?raw-material? (energy) all the time and so the recycling of the energy continues. After some period of time energy of the quarks energy can change at which point quark has won?t have any of that energy which it earlier had? It raises up the question, Does for example cores of the atoms in old buildings switched their energy upon a time, hence there wouldn?t be any of that energy which the building had just after the construction? Stars and planets are like big ?fish traps? or ?fish nets? which absorb more and more of that same ?raw material? (energy) which from everything around us constructs. In the same time they change to contain less and less dense energy. 3. Three dimensional expansion creates a pressure which in other hand creates all the expanding objects radiate themselves i.e. energy in waves which have the character of different energy concentration etc. Density of the eternal energy changes in the eternal space, which will never change! The substance does not alter to an energy. The substance itself is energy. The substance / The energy alters all the time to a less dense substance / energy. The substance / The energy alters to a less dense energy in a space that has always existed. The space does not increase! The space does not expand or curve! The whole concept of expanding space has been pulled out of the hat, because people has believed that the pulling force does exist. There is no such force as pulling force! The Quarks The quarks are formed out of energy that alters all the time to a less dense energy. The quarks expand and radiate energy waves. These waves the expading qvarks push themselves away from each other. The quarks absorb more energy from the particles that move through the quarks. When the expanding quarks push themselves away from each other the energy radiating from the quarks pass and pushing becomes weaker. The quarks continue to expand, at the same time they come closer to each other without actually moving towards each other and the pushing strenghens. An external pressure is directed towards the quarks because more energy from the other atomcores and from those particles that move in an area between the atomcores and radiate their energy towards the atomcores. The pattern of an atom The energy of the atomcore alters to a less dense energy. The atom core expands and radiates energywaves that have the nature of electron and particule. Also the electrons and the particules alter to a less dense energy and radiate their energy as waves. The atomcore absorbs as if it would fill up more energy towards itselef from those particules that pass the atomcores or through the core. So the particules also alter to a less dense energy and radiate their energy. The particules also absorb energy towards themselves from the radiation of the other particules. The electrons continue their journey towards atomcores nearby. They have interaction with the energy waves that they meet. They produce variation of pressure and with confronting energy-wawes new electrons are produced. These electrons continue their journey towards atomcores nearby etc. After that the energy itself continues towards the atomcore and makes the atomcore to explode in other words to change faster into a less dense energy ect. One Simple Principle » Introduction * » Map for pages * .
-
The distance to Earth 10 light-years. Moving almost at the speed of light towards the Earth and the Earth in one year, your time is spent on just one second. Findings Globe and see the Earth rotating under the sun, you second. When you measure what kind of trip Globe is moving under you per second, you will notice the earth moving a lot more than the speed of light. This should not be possible in your theory appropriate. Still, this is your theory appropriate? a contradiction!
-
Dense and massive piece. The slow time. The beginning was a dense concentration of energy, whose time was slow. Therefore, the background radiation is very stretched. the radiation waves began to move less frequently. Relative to existing energy-waves. During the first stars, the energy was more frequent than the current stars. During the first stars, the time was slow relative to the current time, the stars. Therefore, the old light is known. generally redshifting Old light waves came less frequently in relation to the existing light waves. Space has always been there. Space is not expanding or curving The energy change of less high-density energy. Even/also nucleus of atoms! One Simple Principle » Introduction * » Map for pages * .
-
Explaination of the OneSimplePrinciple Model From: gadzometer from Australia YouTube - Explaination of the OneSimplePrinciple Model http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omgQ6kLlHdE&feature=channel_page Check it out!
-
I prophecy, big bang theory people going to make that knd of tehory later. New big bang thweory where space can expanding some area different faster. i donyt like theory who say, space expanding. If space changes in any way, space post to be some place, where space can change some way. Best, easy, and simple theory win. Only energy density changes in space who dont change at all. i just wonder, what is this force, who keeping this energy inside nucleus of atoms same density? How nucleus of atoms interactive with electrons, if nucleus of atoms stay in same density all a time? how atoms interactive? No way, i think, this energy who is inside nucleus of atoms, just expanding/exploding all a time. Sun dont take a round, even it is looks like sun take a round. Things who falling down, looks like they moving to direction who is middle of earth, but this things moving other direction, but not so fast what expanding earth skin moving. Kopernikus was King and i am new King. Now we have to wait new Galileo Galilei who proof that! See you! :hihi:
-
Heart * According to this new idea, the heart expands rhythmically in beats, but it does not contract by itself. Instead, while the heart is not expanding, everything adjacent to the heart continues to expand at an evenly accelerating pace. The heart is thus affected by an external pressure which makes the still expanding blood inside the heart push its way out of the heart. Blood flows in the veins due to pressure fluctuations. The blood flowing back to the heart does not have enough space to expand normally as it rubs against the valves. After this friction blood expands faster than usual, which results in a vortex closing the valve. And now the heart starts to expand again in a pulse. Then how can it be explained that you can see it with your own eyes how a heart contracts during heart surgery? This is in fact a three-dimensional illusion, which is based on the pulsating expansion of the heart and the evenly accelerating expansion of everything surrounding the heart. Addition on April 10, 2007 The sinuatrial node emits an electric pulse, in other words, an energy wave whose separate energy bunches take with them energy waves released by the atomic nuclei in the heart (atoms included in the molecules that the cells consist of). Therefore, the energy waves cannot penetrate the surrounding atoms and get into their nuclei, and this is why the heart stops expanding for a while. Simultaneously, external pressure helps the heart to contract in relation to the other organs. After that, the heart expands in a pulse, as the energy waves make their way into the atomic nuclei in the adjacent cells, forcing the energy in them to be released in a pulsating manner. Arrhythmia is caused when the energy pulse released from the sinuatrial node cannot make its way through a certain area, and so it cannot sweep the energy away from the space between cells, molecules and atomic nuclei in the walls. When the organ is physically strained, for instance, the concerned area becomes positively charged, that is to say, there are denser energy waves moving between the nuclei of the atoms within that area. During exertion the sinuatrial node, too, pulsates denser energy waves containing a higher amount of energy, and so they are able to penetrate the area. After the exertion the sinuatrial node settles faster, and the electric pulses released from the node cannot make their way through the charged area quickly enough.
-
"If I understand you correctly, you are claiming that particles change size ?" Yes! Also nucleus of atoms change size! Also your body change size! Also earth change size! Also Sun change size" :hihi:
-
Red shift (no doppler) proofs, photons expanding/exploding and emit/radiate energywaves and with this energywaves, photons pushing themselfs same way what phtons expanding/exploding! Later, when phtons are old, they start pushing themselfs faster what they expanding/exploding and thats why old light it is redshifted! Thats why you dont have a theory of everything! Space dont expanding at all.
-
"Best way to think about the expanding of space is to think of a raisin loaf made with leavened bread and being baked. As the load is baking the size is growing larger. The spacing between raisins are expanding. In this same way the spacing between galaxies is expanding." This is WRONG You have to understund, energy is a leavend bread whos size is growing larger! Also photons are dough,/paste whos size is growing larger. NO SPACE You cant make any test with space. Entropy proofs, energy expanding/exploding all a time. same thing happening for energy who is inside nucleus of atoms. Are you be afraid that? .
-
I just wonder why you dont have a theory of everything? Are you sire, you have a right model of/an atom? Big bang theory proofs, all energy was very density 13,7 billion years ago? Today this same energy it is not so density? We already know, nucleus of atoms is only energy? How this energy can keep "himselfs" same density? What it is this force? How that force working? How space expanding? How space can expanding? Where space is? Is space some other space who dont changes?
-
Huge undersea mountain found off Indonesia: scientists Huge undersea mountain found off Indonesia: scientists May 29th, 2009 A massive underwater mountain discovered off the Indonesian island of Sumatra could be a volcano with potentially catastrophic power, a scientist said Friday. Ads by Google MBE Plasma Atom Source - Atom Source for e.g. nitriding GaN, AlN, InN, SiN or Oxide growth Indonesian government marine geologist Yusuf Surachman said the mountain was discovered earlier this month about 330 kilometres (205 miles) west of Bengkulu city during research to map the seabed's seismic faultlines. The cone-shaped mountain is 4,600 metres (15,100 feet) high, 50 kilometres in diameter at its base and its summit is 1,300 metres below the surface, he said. "It looks like a volcano because of its conical shape but it might not be. We have to conduct further investigations," he told AFP. He denied reports that researchers had confirmed the discovery of a new volcano, insisting that at this stage it could only be described as a "seamount" of the sort commonly found around the world. "Whether it's active or dangerous, who knows?" he added. The ultra-deep geological survey was conducted with the help of French scientists and international geophysical company CGGVeritas. The scientists hope to gain a clearer picture of the undersea lithospheric plate boundaries and seafloor displacement in the area, the epicentre of the catastrophic Asian quake and tsunami of 2004. The tsunami killed more than 220,000 people across Asia, including 168,000 people in Aceh province on the northern tip of Sumatra. Indonesia is on the so-called Pacific "Ring of Fire," where the meeting of continental plates causes high volcanic and seismic activity. Onesimpleprinciple over two years ago Tsunam 2004* Accurate measuredevices discovered en energypulse coming through the globe only a day after a powerful earthquake and tsunami born in Asia at year 2004. The scientists came to a conclusion that this powerful energypulse came from a star which is called magnetari. In this particular star there has developed apparently a starquake and it released fast a lot of energy. According to my idea that dense energywave opened up energy to every direction and developed itself an energyfront, which came to globe a day before the actual energypulse. The energybudles of this energyfront burned out to openening energywaves coming from atomcores of the ocean and oceanbottom. At the same time these energywaves increased their thickness / energy. That is why the ocean expanded and developed an powerful earthquake at the bottom of the ocean.The massive energybudles opening up from the globe didn´t therefore interact with that three-dimentionally expanding energybundles of of the energyfront and so they pushed eachother towards the certain area of the globe (=bended towards a same area). From there they released a lot of ebergy towards the actual energupulse. Tsunami and earthquake opened up energy from the globe and protected the globe the same way as for example the magnetic field protects the globe from the energybundles coming from the sun. In a way the energybundles opening up from the globe "peel" storeys that are farthest and injurious for life back to the sun. The mountains* Neal Adams has developed "Theory of Expanding Planets"-model about how the planets expand three-dimentionally. According to Neal once the wasnt just one continent rounded by a sea, but the old continents were the only surface of the globe.´The three-dimentional expanding has torn apart the continents from each other. Neal doesn´t talk about accelerated expanding, so his theory needs gravitation. According to my theory there is no observable expanding if there is not enough variation of the pressure. Once for example a supernova explosion that happened nearby the globe brought an energywave dence enough towards the globe. The energic energybudles of this wave pushed themselves through the atomcores of the globe deep inside the globe (for example up to ten kilometres). These energybudles cleaned with them energywaves coming from the atomcores. The expanding atoms of the globe that located outside this area, pushed the atomcores of that area closer to each other. At the same time the expanding atomcores of that area expanded close to each other like in cold fusion. This is how heavier substaces originate and in this case I mean the shelf. If the separate energybudles of a energypulse that came towards the globe were quarks or protons/neutrons, they would have brought more substance deep underneath the globes surface. This developes a pressure that is bigger than normally to that area and this pressure accelerates the substace of that area to push itself away from the focal point of the globe. This is how the mountains developed. This excess pressure makes also the globe to expand in that area so much that it is noticeable afterwards. One Simple Principle Introduction* Mapforpages* Maybe they are going to see, how that mountain grow faster than other mountain!
-
The black hole inside born less/little bit new space. They contain protruding less new space. Particulate matter containing more new space. The light is of the redshifting what the older lights. What older photons, the more they contain into the new space.Born more new space. Black holes surrounded by a thin space. Space is not so fat/wrinkled, wrinkly. Black hole is approaching, paragraph thinner and thinner space. Galaxy in the area between the spacecraft is the most wrinkled/wrinkly. The particulate-containing arises most new space. Downhill towards the celestial songs. The steepest decline in black holes around which gaunt, meagre, slim, thin, skinny, scrawny, spare, meager, lank space. Small cold pieces containing a lot of new space to knit pieces around the space. This powerful new theory linking and expanding and curving/bending theories of space! English it is not my language at all. But i try to say, inside black holes dont born new space so much. Inside old particle born lot of new space. Thats explain same time expanding space and curving/bending space, if you believe, space expanding. Thats funny theory, but it is working very nice way. I dont believe that theory, because space dont expanding at all.
-
You believe that space is expanding? You like this! Very dense energy. Space is expanding exponentially. Then the space is expanding locally at a slower rate. Galaxy seeds arise. Thus, the space to expand in these areas the center more slowly than usual. Galaxy centers, giant black holes are born. Then expanded into the space galaxy outer edge and the center of the area between the up to hundreds of billions of points slower than normal. The seeds of stars are born. Then expanded into the space inside the stars in each of the atomic core of a regional bit more slowly than usual. Atoms in the seed production. Then the space to expand these areas in more than one place more slowly than usual. quarks arise, etc. Of particles inside the space is expanding faster and spreads a bit of energy out. For example, the sun will do the particles move away from the sun, but the spread between the expanding space for a little inside. What parents fotoneja, the faster the spread of space containing the particles, and thus the red light moves to mission in space, the more what the older lights, etc. This theory will win the present initial explosion theory, and is thus a very good theory if you wants to BELIEVE in expanding the space, etc.? In this theory, the energy density does not ever change, because the only space is expanding. One Simple Principle Introduction* One Simple Principle Introduction* Mapforpages* .
-
Check out some videos YouTube - Etimespace's Channel YouTube - Etimespace's Channel YouTube - 1. Theory (Idea) of expanding atoms. Kuopio http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnmQWMLv53Q&feature=channel YouTube - 1. Idea from Kuopio http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=szE69GtZ8Jo&feature=channel_page
-
Redshift proofs, photons also exploding all a time. Science people say, space expanding far away from us. Is this science people been there, where space expanding? is this science people make any test with space who expanding? You dont have a theory of everything! Quess why? because you have stupid theory of expanding space. Occam cut off stupid theory. We dont need space who expanding. Space dont born. Space been there for ever. Like also energy whos density can changing in space who dont change at all. .
-
Really, do you really can see space? HOW it is possibility? No way dude. you cant see space. You can see stars, because stars exploding and emit/radiate particle like photons. Also photons exploding and emit/radiate energy all a time. You can look old light and new light and you can see what happend for old phtons. Redshifting ( no doppler) Redshifting dont proof space expanding. Redshifting proofs, photons exploding too. It is just about entropy in space who dont expanding. http://onesimpleprinciple.com/296 .
-
What happens for atoms after 1000 000 billion years? All atoms energy is expanding There is no stars at all. Stars energy it is "redshifting". If you take your leg and hand near your body, you dont emit/radiate yours energy so fast far away from you. Photons are small particle of energy and photons cant keep themselfs hot/density so easy, thats why light redshifting ( no doppler) You cant make a test with new quarks. You can look old light and new light and you can see what happend for photons because of entropy. You cant make any test with space. You cant proof, space expanding.
-
Two galaxy population. Between the metric measurement. 10 000 billion years, and the metric measure of the atoms are split with the state of particles. The distance metric is stretched. "red-shifted" How much space is enlarged relative to the metric measure that is otherwise a stretched / expanded? .
-
Now YOU can make a history!
buddha elämuni replied to buddha elämuni's topic in Strange Claims Forum
Perhaps physicists should take 15 minutes, the dose per pulse magnetic brain's left of that first? Then they too can handle the new physics at the right side of the brain? Toista | Yle Areena | Yle.fi There is some finnish, but everything important with english. -
Perhaps physicists should take 15 minutes, the dose per pulse magnetic brain's left of that first? Then they too can handle the new physics at the right side of the brain? Toista | Yle Areena | Yle.fi There is some finnish, but everything important with english.