Jump to content

- - - - -

An Alternative To What Dr. Edwin Hubble Saw

Expansion of the Universe

  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#18 fahrquad


    All I know is that I know nothing.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1221 posts

Posted 04 March 2019 - 02:45 PM

I recall a Science Fiction short story I read about 45 years ago where life on Earth was considered an infestation and the rest of the universe was moving way from us to avoid contamination.  I cannot recall the title or author after all these years.  A rather different explanation for the expansion of the universe IMHO.


So expansion is caused by cosmic cooties?   :oops: 

#19 RodneyBelieves



  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts

Posted 01 April 2019 - 01:32 PM

In this article, I read that astronomers used Gravitational Lensing to measure the Hubble Value:




I then added code to my simulator of Steady Rate expansion to track observed light that is deflected by an object to an observer.  It turns out that multiple images from an object emitted at the same moment in time all yield the same Hubble Constant value to any observer.  In other words, yet another hit for this model.  This model would predict what these scientist saw and offer an alternative interpretation of the data.


I added the approach I used to code of Gravitational Lensing into my simulator and the data that came out of it.  You can see on my website, search for "Gravitational Lensing"  There are two entries.  The first explores lensing in a clean expansion environment.   The second, with the observer out of sync in the expansion motion.  


Both would offer what these scientist are reporting.  However, they do not give much detail as to the nature of the data or how they analyzed it.


My website again:  http://hubbleexpansion.com/



Here is the main thrust of what I added to my website concerning Gravitational Lensing:








#20 RodneyBelieves



  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts

Posted 23 April 2019 - 10:21 AM

I read about another observation in our Universe report by NASA scientists.  The minute I read it I perceived an observation coming out of my simulator that sounds a lot like it.  This motion is generated in my simulator when the observer is moving out of sync with the pattern.  It is a perceived expansion within the greater expansion, a very localized observation, just like the one being reported by NASA. They named it "Dark Flow".





Here is a plot that I posted on my website that illustrates it: