Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

New Ads/conformal Wave Theory Of Gravitation (That Calculates Velocity Of Qe)


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#35 Super Polymath

Super Polymath

    Creating

  • Members
  • 1024 posts

Posted 16 March 2018 - 02:14 PM

Mass is equal to the dividend by which n exceeds 6 per meter. The greater the mass, the slower gravitational interaction. The weaker the mass, the faster the gravitational interaction, the rate of the gravitational interaction exceeds the speed of light by a factor equal to the dividend by which 4 exceeds n.
This is how we quantify our pilot waves in the article above for ToE completeness. Because the point of all this is superluminal communication, we need to be able to determine every possible outcome of a quantum controlled chain reaction between entangled particles in order to send & receive messages this way.

~|2x|+/-~|2x|=n, 6>n>4, 0<x<1, f(n)=lambda(pi)^2

c=c*x where f(x)=6/n where n>6, c=c*x where f(x)=4/n where 4>n

Say my equation for f(n) on the previous is 7. The amount of de sitter/ADS nullification per meter makes the gravitational waves propagate from the body of mass at a velocity of 86% of the normal speed of light. Say n=3, the speed of light is 75% faster. Say n=googol, the speed of light is 1/6ths of a googol times slower per meter, that's one meter away from the event horizon of a very, very, very, very, very large black hole.

Edited by Super Polymath, 16 March 2018 - 02:32 PM.


#36 Super Polymath

Super Polymath

    Creating

  • Members
  • 1024 posts

Posted 16 March 2018 - 02:37 PM

You have to adjust lambda for distances equal to the surface volume of an atomic nucleus instead of meters in order to realize superluminal telecommunication. Our most sensitive equipment can see to find thermal changes on that scale via electron holography.

The reason one has to adjust the equation is because the speed of light changes so much that it wouldn't be accurate enough to determine the outcome of the wave piloted chain reaction between entangled particles for the average velocity of c over even a cubic meter. There's too many changes in the velocity of microgravity between any two points. We're talking about removing statistical probabilities in our calculations to acquire true quantum control.

The speed of light is an averaging out of an endlessly varying velocity of GWs at the microscopic level. In a range of a few percents faster & a few percents slower than the actual speed of light. Of course at below the planck length these variation are ALL faster in the vacuum.

Edited by Super Polymath, 16 March 2018 - 02:45 PM.


#37 Super Polymath

Super Polymath

    Creating

  • Members
  • 1024 posts

Posted 16 March 2018 - 02:47 PM

Id est cherenkov radiation, neutrinos, QE, rate of expansion, etc.

Edited by Super Polymath, 16 March 2018 - 02:47 PM.


#38 Super Polymath

Super Polymath

    Creating

  • Members
  • 1024 posts

Posted 16 March 2018 - 03:03 PM

I chose lambdapi^2 because pi is a perfect curve, & lambda thermal conduction (more entropy more space for white holes to gather in). Squaring it simply accounts for it's ADS counterpart. But that's probably not the right function for how many dimensions you'd get at a given point in perpendicular DS/ADS amalgamated space. But a theoretical particle physicist would know what I mean. The quantum eraser is what moves bodies together, it is the only fundamental interaction you need for 5 fundamental interactions (gravity, SNF, wnf, em, & expansion) caused by heterodimeric torsion

#39 Super Polymath

Super Polymath

    Creating

  • Members
  • 1024 posts

Posted 17 March 2018 - 10:54 AM

~|2x|+/-~|2x|=n, 6>n>4, 0<x<1, f(n)=(lambda/10^15)•((4•pi/3)r^3)

c=c•x where f(x)=6/n where n>6, c=c•x where f(x)=4/n where 4>n

n=the speed of gravitational wave propagation for a cosmos less than or equal to lambda of the current cosmos the size of 600 billion light years, or greater than or equal to a planck length.

The microscopic pilot wave is an aggregate of infinitessimal quantum eraser phenomena as reality goes from 2->3 dimensions, g is an aggregate of microscopic waves.

The pilot wave (n) is infinitely inaccurate gravitational waves on the total cosmic scale, but on our scale it should be accurate enough to see how the pilot wave effects QED, that should be enough data when culminated with electron holography & laser inferometer readings on thermodynamic fluctuations in the quantum foam between point a & point b cubic volumes in the spacetime foam to predict the outcome of quantum controlled, wave piloted chain reactions between entangled particles. Enough so that one could send messages back & forth this way.

Which makes modern satellite communication like a messenger pigeon by comparison.

Edited by Super Polymath, 17 March 2018 - 09:13 PM.


#40 Super Polymath

Super Polymath

    Creating

  • Members
  • 1024 posts

Posted 17 March 2018 - 10:23 PM

Finding Einstein's Illusive Teleparallel Gravity & The Spacetime Ether

Einstein once wrote that "Spacetime without the ether is unthinkable", and I agree.

The quantum eraser is the only fundamental interaction. This interaction being between two boundless branes that are omni-perpendicular to, and that are the corporeal reverse of, one another. All motion therein is the result of torsion. The motion is of a chiral nature, and caused by the beginningless and neverending evolution of these branes, working to achieve one plane-like state via the quantum eraser.

https://ibb.co/dL4Yhx

The black spots are of a negative plane from our perspective, the white circles of a positive plane inverse to the black circles. This is the universe in my theory before an infinite past, meaning it both was & was not actually two dimensional. Now when it goes from 2 to 3 motion is created, because the circles become spheres like the thing from pack man chomping it's mouth - if the circles are viewed from the flat part of the plane (making them just lines) - with a velocity equal to the scale relativity dependent speed in which gravity waves propagate.

As the circles grow that third dimension to become spheres an infinite number of infinitessimal circles existing between each circle get absorbed by it as they also become spheres.

Contact between real universe & reverse universe leads to zero, equitable nullification of portions of both realms.
So I'd imagine the replication of hierarchically miniaturizing fractal qubits you get as the black & white qubit circles grow their third dimensions at c as they become spheres the smaller ones between them get erased - since the fractals between them stretch out forever as exponentially miniaturizing dividends - decreasing the space between white qubits & black qubits.

This is the original pull that begins the infinite torsional pendulum of spacetime & matter-energy, how our cosmos appears to revolve at every level. Also why the white holes wrap around black holes like a hollow sphere, until the black hole dissolves the quasar & vice versa. *This process is why local increases in thermal density will eventually increase entropy locally as well.

(*That's how energy conservation is temporarily broken, that's why every antiproton becomes a proton & why there seems to be more matter than antimatter. It takes longer for entropically fleeting energy to aggregate into matter than for matter to break apart into energy*)

https://pdfs.semanti...b54cae658da.pdf

The speed of light in this theory will be relative, not constant, because my f(n) equation will yield a fraction, & that means it will employ fractal geometry. As the addition of luminal velocities can become superluminal only I'm two dimensional space, it can also be superluminal within any dimension that's <3.

There's somewhere between 4 & 6 real physical dimensions, ~|2x|+/-~|2x|=n, 6>n>4, 0<x<1, f(n)=lambda(pi)^2.

~|2x|+/-~|2x|=n, 6>n>4, 0<x<1, f(n)=(lambda/10^15)•((4•pi/3)r^3)
c=c•x where f(x)=6/n where n>6, c=c•x where f(x)=4/n where 4>n

n=the speed of gravitational wave propagation for a cosmos less than or equal to lambda of the current cosmos the size of 600 billion light years, or greater than or equal to a planck length.
The microscopic pilot wave is an aggregate of infinitessimal quantum eraser phenomena as reality goes from n>2+n+n+n=3|6|3=n-n-n-2<n dimensions, g is an aggregate of microscopic waves.
The pilot wave (n) is infinitely inaccurate gravitational waves on the total cosmic scale, but on our scale it should be accurate enough to see how the pilot wave effects QED, that should be enough data when culminated with electron holography & laser inferometer readings on thermodynamic fluctuations in the quantum foam between point a & point b cubic volumes in the spacetime foam to predict the outcome of quantum controlled, wave piloted chain reactions between entangled particles. Enough so that one could send messages back & forth this way.
Which makes modern satellite communication like a messenger pigeon by comparison.

The Cosmology

Let's talk about this thing,

cmb.jpg

This is a primordial cloud of gas & cosmic dust. It's heavy in most place, tremendously so. Everything is so compact that it's causing interference patterns in photons, enough so that they travel slower. Hopefully it's the result of QED interference, because if not that would mean light has mass ;)

There's no proof that the universe was ever more dense than here. No proof of zero time, no proof of a big bang. For almost a century it's been well-documented that there exists mass beyond the CMB.

Now there's more evidence than ever, cosmic bruising, dark flow, etc. That matter would now be over 600 billion light years away.

Some of the missing baryonic matter from the missing Baryon problem might still be missing:

"The initial measurements still do not account for all the ordinary matter, and some believe the remaining portion could be made up by exotic unobserved objects such as black holes or dark stars. Cosmologists are also still yet to discover the nature of dark matter, which makes up even more of the universe."

This could be wayward extra-cosmic galaxies from the source of the left strong GWs traveling into our cosmic domain, or at least a gravitational domino effect in the gravitational chain-link of galaxies tugging us (modern dark flow), initiating the first phase of the big crunch, so the expansion of the CMB could be the result of GWs from beyond the known universe.

Gravity is not a static field, Newtonian expansion shows that frame dragging is a constant. GWs propagate at the speed of light (demonstrated by LIGO in 2017), so GW expansion (given it's the same as the current rate of expansion) involves the addition of luminal velocities for scale relativity: there could be superluminal GWs! Consider for a moment that if adjacent bodies are in a later state of expansion than the fully expanded CMB is now, than just as the current speed of light is faster than it was 13 billion years ago, the speed of GWs propagating from those ultra-low density, ludicrously wide bodies could be faster than anything you could imagine due to scale relativity, time becomes triply relative, quadruply relative, ad infinitum, to us.

The fastest GWs have traveled the farthest to get here and have therefore lost the most strength. This gravitation doesn't have to be stronger than ours to cause expansion, one just has to be stronger than the other.

From this picture we can derive equations in order to define the effects that this extra-cosmic gravitation will have on our cosmos:

C = (Length of Left Strong GWs( c )ly)/(600billionly ( c ))

Length of GWs = length of the left strong GWs/.05 ly

Length of right strong GWs = (length of GWs x .27) - 600billionly

Length of left weak GWs = length of GWs x .27 ly

length of right weak GWs = length of GWs x .68

Velocity of left strong gravitational waves = ((length of left strong GWs)C)/(600billionlyC)

Velocity of right strong gravitational waves = ((length of right strong GWs)C)/(600billionlyC); (velocity of left strong GWs + velocity of right strong GWs)/2 = Current Rate of Expansion for galaxies

Velocity of left weak gravitational waves = ((length of right weak GWs)C)/(600billionlyC)

Velocity of right weak gravitational waves = ((length of left weak GWs)C)/(600billionlyC)

(Velocity of left weak GWs) + (Velocity of right weak GWs)/2 = The current rate of expansion for the quantum foam

So,

Velocity of left strong GWs = 2.6023649x10^30 m/s

Velocity of right strong gravitational waves = 5.2047298 x 10^30 m/s

Velocity of left weak gravitational waves = 1.405277 x 10^31 m/s

Velocity of right weak gravitational waves = 3.5392163 x 10^31 m/s

Current Rate of Expansion for galaxies = 3.9035474 x 10^30 m/s

The current rate of expansion for the quantum foam = 2.4722467 x 10^31 m/s

The big crunch will be complete when our "universe" expands to be the same size as the source of the left strong GWs, which we've already calculated to be in 1.56141895 x 10^42 years when determining the length of the left strong GWs. Plug that into length of GWs times velocity of GWs ly in meters/(1.56141895 x 10^42 + 13.8 billion years in seconds & the speed of light in the superverse is 3.1225079 x 10^41 m/s, this is sort of your lorentz transformation which can be used to calculate the size in which atomic structures begin to form in the superverse by determining the new planck length by multiplying the speed of light in the superverse by tp, your new lp is (3.1225079 x 10^41) m x (5.39 x 10^−44) s = 0.01683031758 meters.

There's approximately 6.81×10^24 planck lengths in the length of a hydrogen atom, so 1.1461446 x 10^23 meters, or 12,114,412 light years for the size of your superverse atom. Which is 121 times larger than the Milky Way & 8 times larger than the Hercules A galaxy.

Let's see the size of an atom in a microverse by dividing the size of the smallest atoms by the size of a superverse atom divided by the size of a normal atom, (1.1461446 x 10^23)/(1.1 x 10^-10) m gives you 1.0419496 x 10^33 as your denominator. So 1.1 x 10^-10/1.0419496 x 10^33) = 1.0557133 x 10^-43 meters for your microverse atom, which is 151,556,296 times smaller than a planck length. Which checks out, you can fit something like 1.96616 x 10^105 atoms in a superverse atom stacked one on top of another & aligned side by side (b/c you can fit 2.130 × 10^108 atoms within 13.6 billion light years & a superverse atom is approx 12 million light years). There's approximately 6.81 x 10^24 planck lengths in the length of an atom, times 151,556,298 is 1.0320984 x 10^33. Cube that, & you can fit 1.0994192 x 10^99 microverse atoms in a normal sized atom. BTW, the speed of light in a microverse is equal to the speed of light in a superverse. You can't use the lorentz transformation to just divide for units that measure velocity in the same way I just for units that measure size, this is because of the effects of time dilation.

A particle of energy is like a universe of matter, with a relatively equivalent amount of mass in adjusted scale. Fall anywhere in space, no matter how seemingly void, and you will land on matter if you're small enough:

empty space ought not be really empty. We have two good reasons to think so: first, electromagnetic signals behave undoubtedly as waves; since they propagate even through intergalactic space, there must be some thing there (everywhere), in which they do wave. Second, quantum theory predicts that vacuum has physical effects, such as the Casimir effect, which is now experimentally confirmed [1].

Gerard t'Hooft, another proponent of ether theory:

"Einstein had difficulties with the relativistic invariance of quantum mechanics (“does
the spooky information transmitted by these particles go faster than light?”). These,
however, are now seen as technical difficulties that have been resolved. It may be consid-
ered part of Copenhagen’s Doctrine, that the transmission of information over a distance
can only take place, if we can identify operators A at space-time point x1 and operators
B at space-time point x2 that do not commute: [A, B] 6= 0 . We now understand that, in
elementary particle theory, all space-like separated observables mutually commute, which
precludes any signalling faster than light. It is a built-in feature of the Standard Model,
to which it actually owes much of its success.
So, with the technical difficulties out of the way, we are left with the more essential
Einsteinian objections against the Copenhagen doctrine for quantum mechanics: it is a
probabilistic theory that does not tell us what actually is going on. It is sometimes even
suggested that we have to put our “classical” sense of logic on hold. Others deny that:
“Keep remembering what you should never ask, while reshaping your sense of logic, and
everything will be fine.” According to the present author, the Einstein-Bohr debate is not
over. A theory must be found that does not force us to redefine any aspect of classical,
logical reasoning.
What Einstein and Bohr did seem to agree about is the importance of the role of an
observer. Indeed, this was the important lesson learned in the 20th century: if something
cannot be observed, it may not be a well-defined concept – it may even not exist at all. We
have to limit ourselves to observable features of a theory. It is an important ingredient
of our present work that we propose to part from this doctrine, at least to some extent:
Things that are not directly observable may still exist and as such play a decisive role
in the observable properties of an object. They may also help us to construct realistic
models of the world.
Indeed, there are big problems with the dictum that everything we talk about must be
observable. While observing microscopic objects, an observer may disturb them, even in
a classical theory; moreover, in gravity theories, observers may carry gravitational fields
that disturb the system they are looking at, so we cannot afford to make an observer
infinitely heavy (carrying large bags full of “data”, whose sheer weight gravitationally
disturbs the environment), but also not infinitely light (light particles do not transmit
large amounts of data at all), while, if the mass of an observer would be “somewhere in between”, ."


More evidence:

The situation is somewhat different when we consider gravity and promote the Lorentz violating tensors to dynamical objects. For example in an aether theory, where Lorentz violation is described by a timelike four vector, the four vector can twist in such a way that local superluminal propagation can lead to energy-momentum flowing around closed paths [206]. However, even classical general relativity admits solutions with closed time like curves, so it is not clear that the situation is any worse with Lorentz violation. Furthermore, note that in models where Lorentz violation is given by coupling matter fields to a non-zero, timelike gradient of a scalar field, the scalar field also acts as a time function on the spacetime. In such a case, the spacetime must be stably causal (c.f. [272]) and there are no closed timelike curves. This property also holds in Lorentz violating models with vectors if the vector in a particular solution can be written as a non-vanishing gradient of a scalar. Finally, we mention that in fact many approaches to quantum gravity actually predict a failure of causality based on a background metric [121] as in quantum gravity the notion of a spacetime event is not necessarily well-defined [239]. A concrete realization of this possibility is provided in Bose-Einstein condensate analogs of black holes [40]. Here the low energy phonon excitations obey Lorentz invariance and microcausality [270]. However, as one approaches a certain length scale (the healing length of the condensate) the background metric description breaks down and the low energy notion of microcausality no longer holds.

----

In the Bohmian view, nonlocality is even more conspicuous. The trajectory of any one particle depends on what all the other particles described by the same wave function are doing. And, critically, the wave function has no geographic limits; it might, in principle, span the entire universe. Which means that the universe is weirdly interdependent, even across vast stretches of space.

----

The hole is quantum-mechanically unstable: It has no bound states. Wormhole wave functions must eventually leak to large radii. This suggests that stability considerations along these lines may place strong constraints on the nature and even the existence of spacetime foam.

----

In invariant set theory, the form of the Bell Inequality whose violation would be inconsistent with realism and local causality is undefined, and the form of the inequality that it violated experimentally is not even gp-approximately close to the form needed to rule out local realism (54) [21]. A key element in demonstrating this result derives from the fact that experimenters cannot in principle shield their apparatuses from the uncontrollable ubiquitous gravitational waves that fill space-time.

----

A finite non-classical framework for physical theory is described which challenges the conclusion that the Bell Inequality has been shown to have been violated experimentally, even approximately. This framework postulates the universe as a deterministic locally causal system evolving on a measure-zero fractal-like geometry IU in cosmological state space. Consistent with the assumed primacy of IU , and p-adic number theory, a non-Euclidean (and hence non-classical) metric gp is defined on cosmological state space, where p is a large but finite Pythagorean prime. Using numbertheoretic properties of spherical triangles, the inequalities violated experimentally are shown to be gp-distant from the CHSH inequality, whose violation would rule out local realism. This result fails in the singular limit p = ∞, at which gp is Euclidean. Broader implications are discussed.

----

This optical pumping scenario is implicitly based on the erroneous quantum mechanical “myth” that quantum “jumps” are instantaneous. In reality transitions between atomic levels take very, very long times, about 10 million times longer than the oscillating period of the electromagnetic radiation that drives the excitation.

The Microverse: A microverse is the same principle as a level 1 multiverse, matter can only arrange itself in so many different ways eventually everything assumes the same form again.

You can fit something like a googol atoms in the next cosmic scale atom. A googolplex microverse atoms in a superverse atom. Something like that. The length of GWs from a superverse is immense, these gravity waves propagate @ 1,041,556,520,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times the speed of light. Think of how much faster the speed of light is now than it was at the time of the cosmic microwave background, the speed of light in a cosmos must equal the speed at which gravitational waves propagate in that cosmos.

If you consider the fact that the difference in size between the current known universe (45 billion light years) & a superverse hydrogen atom (12,114,412 light years) is 3714.58391872, around the same as the difference in size between a photon's wavelength (500 nanometers) & a hydrogen atom (1.1 x 10^-10 meters) which is 4545.45454545.

If you consider the fact that the difference in size between the current known universe (45 billion light years) & a superverse hydrogen atom (12,114,412 light years) is 3714.58391872, around the same as the difference in size between a photon's wavelength (500 nanometers) & a hydrogen atom (1.1 x 10^-10 meters) which is 4545.45454545.

Large elliptical galaxies with active cores are basically isolated super-space protons in the vacuum. As opposed to a beam of protons as with the double slit experiment, these are few in number nestled within the wavelength of photons. Such as the IC1101 galaxy, which would currently be an isolated anti-proton in the superverse, when it starts flying apart from expansion it will be a positively charged proton. We wouldn't be able to spot such protons in the microverse because they would be infinitesimal blinks in the vacuum radiation, living no longer than one tenth of a nanosecond.

Virtual Background Radiation, well, the Microwave Background radiation is still a photon, so actually the Standard model lends to this as something highly possible.

https://en.wikipedia...irtual_particle

i4Zqd.gif

Just like the active cores of various galaxies, IC 1101 being the largest, protons might have various sizes. Considering a superversal hydrogen atom would only be a little over twice the volume of the IC 1101 galaxy - it's the core of the galaxy that would be used for the volume of the proton especially considering that superversal humans would find the entire galaxy impossible to observe as it exists for 10 billions of a second. For normal beams of protons that feed off one another, reviving each other enough times to be observed by our instruments as cosmic rays, only the bright centers of active supergiant galaxies such as IC 1101 could be observed.

Not that the ultra dense cosmic bath of radiation that was our universe some 13 billion years ago active like the points of luminosity of photons, the primordial CMB sphere made of pockets of quark gluon plasma would literally be a superverse electron! The electromagnetic polar jets of radiation of the primordial CMB would be the polarity of the superverse electron, each pole would literally be the 2 down quarks of the electron. The muon is just a giant electron, whereas the neutron is a superversal ball of solid quark gluon plasma, imagine the hottest densest pockets of primordial gas within our universe 13 billion years ago, now make it so an ungodly monster of a pulsar is composed entirely of the hottest regions of the CMB with no gaps in quark gluon plasma throughout it's entire structure & also imagine it being many times the size of our CMB with a supermassive black hole, surrounded by a qg plasma quasar unlike anything you could imagine in power-scale, that's several times larger than the one within the active core of the IC 1101 galaxy (which is the largest SMBH we know about) feeding the Kronos of a pulsar, & you get a superverse neutron, it's up quark where matter from the nearby quasar, aka superverse proton, is feeding it material whereas it's two down quarks are it's polar matter jets.

Yes I know that normally the pulsar feeds the quasar since the BH possesses a greater density of "mass", but in the case of a positively charged proton as opposed to an anti-proton, the microverse BH has consumed so much "mass" from it's surrounding quasar material. So much so that the quasar material is no long attracted to the proton/micro-BH so much as it is attracted to the neutron/micro-pulsar. Now, however, please note all neutron-proton nuclei begin their life-cycles with the proton actually being a negatively charged anti-proton in this ADS/Conformal GW Theory - but their life cycles end with the it being a normal positively charged proton feeding the neutron with matter emanating from the single down quark of the proton to the single up quark of the neutron before the cycle repeats with the reverse of that: with the neutron feeding the proton.

This means that, for a neutron, its down quarks are a compilation of magnetic dipole moments, the up quark is a hologram composed of a collection of briefer magnetic monopole moments - & vice versa for protons.

An antiproton/proton is a holographic compilation of evaporating & respawning microcosmic active/inactive galactic cores with a micro black hole in the center. The neutron is a microcosmic magnetic magnetar that won't evaporate unless freed from the atomic nucleus. Mind you that the electron itself is the size of the universe in microversal terms.
Virtual particles aren't really what we think they are.

Quark-gluon plasma is the absolute densest state matter can take. We see it in the cores of neutron stars, discs of quasars as matter is folded upon itself by compressing spacetime (gravity/mass/dark matter) around macro black holes, & in the cosmic microwave background radiation.

But in this hypothesis it's more like a black star in a fully classical, not just semiclassical, framework of gravity.

Any denser, & matter is just a macro black hole as there's no space between micro black holes. It's composed of micro quasars with micro black holes at their cores, barely held apart by micro expansion. Unlike vacuum radiation & the atomic world, these microverses are non-anthropic (no stellar eras) because less entropy equates to less complexity. Quark-gluon plasma is the only state of matter composed entirely of microverses that are exclusively the same as itself. Atoms & vacuum radiation will have microverses with atoms, quark-gluon plasma & vacuum radiation within them, quark-gluon plasma is only composed of microverses that are entirely filled with quark-gluon plasma.

https://photos.googl...JUkqc-vp66c0fte

Consider the mystery of primordial SMBH formation solved as well as the reason behind why the minority of giant red stars that should collapse into black holes instead collapse into magnetars

background=rgb(247,247,247)]This is much more versatile than QM, it works in explaining virtually any quantum effect. For instance, let's use the quantum venn diagram paradox;

[/background]

https://photos.googl...A13uO15vomNJMpi.

The non-virtual photons adopt new polarities as they expand, aka wave, through the vacuum mediums of the quantum sub-foam microverse. More polarizing filters=greater variety of polarities.

Key Terms

Edited by Super Polymath, 17 March 2018 - 11:42 PM.