this is a video on Quantum Mechanics that aims to familiarize people with general interests in physics, with some of the main ideas in quantum mechanics.
can I get feedbacks on it, I don't have any subscribers at all, and I'd like feedbacks to know how the video could be evaluated.
So that's why I decided to share it here.
I want to know whether the way I discussed the topic made sense and whether it was interesting or not, Because I made my own research about it and there hasn't been an instructor along the way, so I wasn't only wondering whether people will understand me properly, I was also wondering whether I myself understand it to a good extent.?
Note: it's my very first time working with the technical part and I didn't have time to do much refinement(It's a competition and there is a deadline)
Also, the video had a maximum limit so I had to be brief at some points.

Can I Get Feedback- Is This Explanation Of Qm Valid?
Started By
EliaGomez
, Oct 25 2016 02:34 PM
QM Quantum theory physics
1 reply to this topic
#1
Posted 25 October 2016 - 02:34 PM
#2
Posted 25 October 2016 - 11:36 PM
Welcome to hypograpy, Elia!
I found your video sensible and easy to understand. It’s a short essay on several extensive and controversial subjects, but I think your position is a reasonable and well-thought-out one.
The only obvious technical error I spotted was referring to the Planck constant as an integer. It’s not an integer, or any other pure number, but a quantity with dimensions of energy * time (M L2 T-1). If you think about it, this makes sense, because as you show in your video, it’s used in the famouns Plank-Einstein relation to convert between the frequency or wavelength and the energy of a photon.
I found your video sensible and easy to understand. It’s a short essay on several extensive and controversial subjects, but I think your position is a reasonable and well-thought-out one.
The only obvious technical error I spotted was referring to the Planck constant as an integer. It’s not an integer, or any other pure number, but a quantity with dimensions of energy * time (M L2 T-1). If you think about it, this makes sense, because as you show in your video, it’s used in the famouns Plank-Einstein relation to convert between the frequency or wavelength and the energy of a photon.
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: QM, Quantum theory, physics
Physics / Math / Engineering →
Physics and Mathematics →
Are Quantum Weirdness Events A Wave Only Activity?Started by pittsburghjoe , 07 Dec 2019 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Physics / Math / Engineering →
Physics and Mathematics →
Alternative theories →
The Forth DimensionStarted by zmigri , 19 Sep 2019 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Physics / Math / Engineering →
Physics and Mathematics →
Pressure Waves. What's Going On?Started by Mattzy , 05 Jul 2019 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Physics / Math / Engineering →
Physics and Mathematics →
TorqueStarted by Nishan , 28 Jun 2019 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Physics / Math / Engineering →
Physics and Mathematics →
Why Normal Universe Seems To Be Weird?Started by Nishan , 27 Jun 2019 ![]() |
|
![]()
|