We do already have a world government it is called the U.N. and the Bilderberg which has ties into every nation on earth, the Bilderberg is basically the shadow government of the U.N., so yes it already exists in many ways.
They do advise governments. However governments can decide to do their own thing. If governments choose not to follow advice, what influence can the Bilderberg group take. Obviously the UN has the military, made up from many nations.
The bildergroup is occupied by probable high ranking masons, many of whom are royalty https://en.wikipedia...rg_participants King Juan Carlos of Spain has many titles, he had when he was alive a title king of Jerusalem, which made him top dog. The Bilderberg group was formed after the 2nd world war https://en.wikipedia...derberg_meeting. Go figure mainly unelected people, control/influence the worlds politics. I assume they have their own agendas. But what degree of influence do they really have?
"The group's original goal of promoting Atlanticism, of strengthening U.S.–European relations and preventing another world war has grown; according to Andrew Kakabadse the Bilderberg Group's theme is to "bolster a consensus around free market Western capitalism and its interests around the globe". In 2001, Denis Healey, a Bilderberg group founder and a steering committee member for 30 years, said, "To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn't go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing."
According to the web page of the group, the meetings are conducted under the Chatham House Rule, allowing the participants to use any information they gained during the meeting, but not to disclose the names of the speakers or any other participants. According to former chairman Étienne Davignon in 2011, a major attraction of Bilderberg group meetings is that they provide an opportunity for participants to speak and debate candidly and to find out what major figures really think, without the risk of off-the-cuff comments becoming fodder for controversy in the media. A 2008 press release from the "American Friends of Bilderberg" stated that "Bilderberg's only activity is its annual Conference and that at the meetings, no resolutions were proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued." However, in November 2009, the group hosted a dinner meeting at the Château of Val-Duchesse in Brussels outside its annual conference to promote the candidacy of Herman Van Rompuy for President of the European Council.
The Bilderberg meetings are also unofficially called the "Bilderberg Group", "Bilderberg conference" or "Bilderberg Club"."
If they can influence who are candidates for the top jobs at the highest levels, they are effectively in charge.
If political persuasion fails at the highest level, and a country steps out of line, with their plans for the human race, (eugenics maybe) what can they do.
If individuals of a country are privy to their countries secrets or plans, and they share them with other members from other countries, is it not treason, unless it is done by well meaning well connected
**** wits royalty and cheating lying bastards politicians. They could agree to betray one group they had previously supported in favor of another to gain influence else where in the world. Why support a minority group in a battle they could never win without massive support, and destabilise a part of the world, like Syria for instance. Removing support will bring the conflict to an end faster, and you do not get blood on your hands.
The one world government according to Albert Pike is one of the aims of the free masons! Like you say we may already have one, hidden behind the smoke and mirrors of politics. If the smoke and mirrors is maintained for the mob/general public, and we are moving slowly in the direction wanted by a hidden governments to closer unity, why should we bother, unless we lose freedoms.