The paper explains that any THEORY that includes a factor (called Gamma) that must be used to change time (time dilation) so that would be SR and specifically LT (in any form) is BOTH WRONG IN THEORY AND IN THE DERIVATION.

Mathematically wrong, and nonsensical as a theory.

His conclusion after showing that the LT equation is theoretically and mathematically wrong, is "both the theory and the derivation are wrong."

Even if you fix up the crap maths in the LT, then the result is that there is no length contraction or time dilation possible. Because even the corrected equations are contradicting the postulates and claims.

So you see, Lorentz Equation can not be used for anything, as its a mistake of logic and derivation.

But we all know that you just ignore anything that does not fit your own beliefs.

What is this crap about the Arab needing to apply to some peer group before his paper is valid? Do you believe in science by committee agreement?

The Arab (which you seem to be using in a racist flavor) has made claims that your pet LT

equation is wrong, so if you are half as smart as you make out, you should simply show where he is going wrong, mathematically.

But you cant, so you just ignore it.