Jump to content

- - - - -

Fusion Power

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Dude Terium

Dude Terium


  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 12 July 2011 - 04:45 PM

The Nation's Commitment to Fusion Is a "Litmus Test," Says
Princeton Scientist

July 11 (LPAC)--In a New York Times op-ed today, titled,
"How Seawater Can Power the World," Stewart Prager, head of the
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory in New Jersey, warns that
while the U.S has no program underway to develop fusion to power
our electric grid, Asia moves forward. He reports that "fusion
research facilities more modern than anything in the United
States are either under construction or [are] operating in China,
Germany, Japan, and South Korea. [It is the case, in fact, that
since the cancellation of Princeton's next-generation tokamak
experiment in the 1990s, and other U.S. experiments, American
physicists have gone to South Korea and worked with Chinese
scientists on their machines]. "The will and enthusiasm of
governments in Asia to fill their energy needs with fusion, as
soon as possible, is nearly palpable. What has been lacking in
the United States is the political and economic will," Prager

Describing fusion as a technology that "will transform the
world's energy supply," Prager mentions that fusion can be used
to generate electricity, create transportation fuels, and for
other uses. While the U.S. is a partner in the International
Themonuclear Fusion Reactor experiment being built in France,
there is no plan to be able to build and use fusion power plants
here. He ends by saying that fusion "is the litmus test for the
willingness of our nation to tackle the tough challenges that
will shape our future. Scientists and engineers stand ready to

#2 Guest_MrMormon_*

  • Guests

Posted 16 August 2011 - 04:47 PM

Like hydrogen, investing in fusion research debatably would cost more than the potential benefits, especially when the ability to pay the cost is so much shakier than in places like China.

#3 Moontanman



  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9029 posts

Posted 16 August 2011 - 06:19 PM

I heard of the promise of fusion being just around the corner all my life, it's always just ten years a way and if they do manage to get it going it will still have radioactive waste unless we perfect aneutronic fusion and we do not have the ingredients for that on the earth. Thorium cycle fission is the way to go, easy, cheap, less waste, shorter lived waste and it does not produce weapons grade materials. We went to the uranium/plutonium cycle so we could make nuclear weapons not because it was the best process. The thorium cycle is more efficient but it just doesn't produce weapons material.

see this thread ---> http://scienceforums...horium-reactor/

#4 maddog


    Cybernetic Quantum Alchemist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1293 posts

Posted 02 December 2011 - 06:31 PM

Just an update y'all may not be aware of --

There is ongoing DOE research at Sandia Labs, Livermore Labs regarding methods of producing enough energy to create fusion.
Moontanman is correct that the next latest solution is just next week. However, it stands -- those are govt programs sponsored by the
Dept of Energy.

Even better are what private industry is doing. In just the last two weeks two programs have made the news. One is a plan from Canada -
I forget the company exactly {try a google search "fusion canada" and you will likely find it}. The second one is affiliated with professors from
UCI and a process called staged Z-pinched technology. There is a company involved MIFTI (URL www.mifti.com). From what I know on the
second it is still in the research frame as "is it sustainable"? and "is it scalable" ?

I might have poo-pooed it until I checked out the website. So do you own search, etc.


#5 TaimurMubeen



  • Members
  • Pip
  • 7 posts

Posted 29 November 2016 - 04:37 PM

I Agree With You Dude Terium.