Introduction to a Premise Linking Science and a Creator

[Mortalsfool]

I’m pretty old, and have no letters to put after my name, which seem useful in gaining credibility. I’m a Christian with a particular obsession to understand God’s works. I’ve been looking for a site where I can post part of a premise, I’ve been trying to find a hole in for over ten years. It posits a homogeneous merging of science, philosophy, and Christianity, in a view of God’s powers at creation, and now. I would like to post it here, where it seems that both Christian beliefs and science can meet. It appears the be without conflict with the sciences, the Bible, Christianity, or, hopefully you. It should even give the Atheists pause! Because with my premise, in order to shoot down the existence of a Creator, they would also have to deny the science of it.

 

I submitted this part of my premise for an analysis by an AI program. I asked: “If I was to prepare a speech using these pages/ would there be any thing ‘original’ or ‘unique’ about my proposal?” As AI has access to most of mankind's knowledge, I expected it’s answer could be ‘no’ and ‘no’ to both queries. It’s response served to convince me it was inspired by God. An audacious claim to think, but that’s the reason I want to post it. You shoot holes in it, I can’t!

 

Since it can be as long as you want to read, ten years of writing, I’m posting little more than a snippet, if this meets with the group's approval.

 

Thanks in advance! I hope you will let me know.

jack

[Moontanman]

This is not  private blog, asking questions or answering them is the premise of this site. Soap boxing and preaching is not allowed. If you can post a question or assert a falsifiable position here then yes. But if you are going to post a link that has to be clicked on to be read off site or post some sort of long winded manifesto then no, I will delete it. I am going to move this post to religion, please read the rules.

[Vmedvil]

7 hours ago, Mortalsfool said:

I’m pretty old, and have no letters to put after my name, which seem useful in gaining credibility. I’m a Christian with a particular obsession to understand God’s works. I’ve been looking for a site where I can post part of a premise, I’ve been trying to find a hole in for over ten years. It posits a homogeneous merging of science, philosophy, and Christianity, in a view of God’s powers at creation, and now. I would like to post it here, where it seems that both Christian beliefs and science can meet. It appears the be without conflict with the sciences, the Bible, Christianity, or, hopefully you. It should even give the Atheists pause! Because with my premise, in order to shoot down the existence of a Creator, they would also have to deny the science of it.

 

I submitted this part of my premise for an analysis by an AI program. I asked: “If I was to prepare a speech using these pages/ would there be any thing ‘original’ or ‘unique’ about my proposal?” As AI has access to most of mankind's knowledge, I expected it’s answer could be ‘no’ and ‘no’ to both queries. It’s response served to convince me it was inspired by God. An audacious claim to think, but that’s the reason I want to post it. You shoot holes in it, I can’t!

 

Since it can be as long as you want to read, ten years of writing, I’m posting little more than a snippet, if this meets with the group's approval.

 

Thanks in advance! I hope you will let me know.

jack

I say, go for it. I would love to see evidence that God exists from the eyes of a Christian using an Artificial intelligence with verifiable evidence and supported claims by this evidence. Personally, I think that God does not exist and if he does exist is a monstrous entity however if you can put evidence forward to support the idea that God does indeed exist as Christians claim. I would love to see that viewpoint as a counter argument to the usual narrative of this website which is that God does not exist and Christians are incorrect believing that an all-powerful, all knowing, always present deity exists that created the universe and not the explanations of science which has verifiable and experimental evidence to support them. I will be looking that what you say closely if you choose to post your argument for God's existence that is rooted in science supposedly.

Edited September 2 by Vmedvil

[OceanBreeze]

19 hours ago, Mortalsfool said:

I’m pretty old, and have no letters to put after my name, which seem useful in gaining credibility. I’m a Christian with a particular obsession to understand God’s works. I’ve been looking for a site where I can post part of a premise, I’ve been trying to find a hole in for over ten years. It posits a homogeneous merging of science, philosophy, and Christianity, in a view of God’s powers at creation, and now. I would like to post it here, where it seems that both Christian beliefs and science can meet. It appears the be without conflict with the sciences, the Bible, Christianity, or, hopefully you. It should even give the Atheists pause! Because with my premise, in order to shoot down the existence of a Creator, they would also have to deny the science of it.

 

I submitted this part of my premise for an analysis by an AI program. I asked: “If I was to prepare a speech using these pages/ would there be any thing ‘original’ or ‘unique’ about my proposal?” As AI has access to most of mankind's knowledge, I expected it’s answer could be ‘no’ and ‘no’ to both queries. It’s response served to convince me it was inspired by God. An audacious claim to think, but that’s the reason I want to post it. You shoot holes in it, I can’t!

 

Since it can be as long as you want to read, ten years of writing, I’m posting little more than a snippet, if this meets with the group's approval.

 

Thanks in advance! I hope you will let me know.

jack

I don't think anyone here wants to read "ten years of writing" on any subject.

If you can summarize your premise in a concise way that maintains its meaning, I am sure we would all give it our fair consideration.

You should, however, prepare yourself for the possibility that your premise may be subjected to ridicule. Then again, if it is logical and truly represents an "homogeneous merging of science, philosophy, and Christianity" it may be well received.

We won't know until we see it, so go ahead and post.