Global warming

[InfiniteNow]

I have three words for you.

 

 

Check... Your... Facts.

 

 

:D

 

 

 

The natural cycles argument doesn't hold water on this one.

 

Global Warming Myths and Facts - Global Warming - Environmental Defense

MYTH: Global warming is just part of a natural cycle. The Arctic has warmed up in the past.

 

FACT: The global warming we are experiencing is not natural. People are causing it.

 

People are causing global warming by burning fossil fuels (like oil, coal and natural gas) and cutting down forests. Scientists have shown that these activities are pumping far more CO2 into the atmosphere than was ever released in hundreds of thousands of years. This buildup of CO2 is the biggest cause of global warming. Since 1895, scientists have known that CO2 and other greenhouse gases trap heat and warm the earth. As the warming has intensified over the past three decades, scientific scrutiny has increased along with it. Scientists have considered and ruled out other, natural explanations such as sunlight, volcanic eruptions and cosmic rays. (IPCC 2001)

 

Though natural amounts of CO2 have varied from 180 to 300 parts per million (ppm), today's CO2 levels are around 380 ppm. That's 25% more than the highest natural levels over the past 650,000 years. Increased CO2 levels have contributed to periods of higher average temperatures throughout that long record. (Boden, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center)

 

As for previous Arctic warming, it is true that there were stretches of warm periods over the Arctic earlier in the 20th century. The limited records available for that time period indicate that the warmth did not affect as many areas or persist from year to year as much as the current warmth. But that episode, however warm it was, is not relevant to the issue at hand. Why? For one, a brief regional trend does not discount a longer global phenomenon.

 

We know that the planet has been warming over the past several decades and Arctic ice has been melting persistently. And unlike the earlier periods of Arctic warmth, there is no expectation that the current upward trend in Arctic temperatures will reverse; the rising concentrations of greenhouse gases will prevent that from happening.

 

 

 

Additional points:

 

The concern is not based off of Al Gore's movie. It's based off of thousands of studies by thousands of researchers.

 

Meteorology and Climatology are not the same field.

 

Appeals to some grant money (or other) conspiracy does NOTHING to refute the data.

 

Lying about the issue helps no one.

[REASON]

One of the world's foremost meteorologists has called the theory that helped Al Gore share the Nobel Peace Prize "ridiculous" and the product of "people who don't understand how the atmosphere works".

 

Dr William Gray, a pioneer in the science of seasonal hurricane forecasts, told a packed lecture hall at the University of North Carolina that humans were not responsible for the warming of the earth.

 

His comments came on the same day that the Nobel committee honoured Mr Gore for his work in support of the link between humans and global warming.

 

I was wondering, moyself, if you could elaborate a bit on why it is you feel that Dr. Gray's assertions would be more legitimate scientifically than the preponderance of climatologists affiliated with the IPCC that recognize the human impact on global climate change.

 

Why does what he says carry more weight for you?