Tormod Posted October 31, 2005 Report Share Posted October 31, 2005 Using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope to view the ninth planet in our solar system, astronomers discovered Pluto may have not one, but three moons. lefthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/5/137119main1_hst_pluto1_516_thumb.jpg[/img]If confirmed, the discovery of the two new moons could offer insights into the nature and evolution of the Pluto system; Kuiper Belt Objects with satellite systems; and the early Kuiper Belt. The Kuiper Belt is a vast region of icy, rocky bodies beyond Neptune's orbit. "If, as our new Hubble images indicate, Pluto has not one, but two or three moons, it will become the first body in the Kuiper Belt known to have more than one satellite," said Hal Weaver of the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Md. He is co-leader of the team that made the discovery. Pluto was discovered in 1930. Charon, Pluto's only confirmed moon, was discovered by ground-based observers in 1978. The planet resides about 3 billion miles from the sun in the heart of the Kuiper Belt. "Our result suggests other bodies in the Kuiper Belt may have more than one moon. It also means planetary scientists will have to take these new moons into account when modeling the formation of the Pluto system," said Alan Stern of the Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colo. Stern was co-leader of the research team. The candidate moons, provisionally designated S/2005 P1 and S/2005 P2, were observed approximately 27,000 miles away from Pluto. The objects are roughly two to three times as far from Pluto as Charon. The team plans to make follow-up Hubble observations in February to confirm the newly discovered objects are truly Pluto's moons. Only after confirmation will the International Astronomical Union consider names for S/2005 P1 and S/2005 P2. The Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys observed the two new candidate moons on May 15, 2005. The candidates are roughly 5,000 times fainter than Pluto. Three days later, Hubble looked at Pluto again. The two objects were still there and appeared to be moving in orbit around Pluto. The team looked long and hard for other potential moons around Pluto. "These Hubble images represent the most sensitive search yet for objects around Pluto," said team member Andrew Steffl of the Southwest Research Institute. "It is unlikely that there are any other moons larger than about 10 miles across in the Pluto system," he said. The Hubble Space Telescope is a project of international cooperation between NASA and the European Space Agency. The Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore conducts Hubble science operations. The Institute is operated for NASA by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., Washington. NASA has images from the research available on the Web, at: http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/hubble_pluto.html Source: NASA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigD Posted October 31, 2005 Report Share Posted October 31, 2005 Only after confirmation will the International Astronomical Union consider names for S/2005 P1 and S/2005 P2Can there be the least question in anyone’s mind what to name these 2 moons? Cerebus Left and Cerebus Right! C’mon, Pluto didn’t hang out with that big a sub-pantheon – we’re fast running out of good mythological names. Plus, Harry Potter fans love two-headed dogs! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merek Posted October 31, 2005 Report Share Posted October 31, 2005 on the subject of moons...what ever happened to that supposed 10th planet...i heard about it when i didnt care about science so i didnt look into it at that time.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockytriton Posted November 1, 2005 Report Share Posted November 1, 2005 wasn't it called Planet X? I heard that it was decided that it wasn't a planet but then later on they decided that it might be again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tormod Posted November 1, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 1, 2005 wasn't it called Planet X? I heard that it was decided that it wasn't a planet but then later on they decided that it might be again. No, Planet X is a myth. However, in recent years both Sedna and Quaouar (sp?) have been found. Then yet another large body was found, all of these are way outside Pluto's orbit. The speculations are now running that our solar system may have a lot more planets than originally though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigD Posted November 1, 2005 Report Share Posted November 1, 2005 wasn't it called Planet X? I heard that it was decided that it wasn't a planet but then later on they decided that it might be again.There’ve been a couple of thread related to this recently, 3365 and 4116. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.