SARS-CoV-2: Suggested eradication methodologies

[dennisfrancisblewett]

This thread is being built on-top of this (0) thread.

 

I’ve been spending more time analyzing the SARS-CoV-2 technologies and responses, and it appears to me one of the best things we can do is get a technology created by Elizabeth Holmes adapted to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and start using it to combat SARS-CoV-2. The technology was learned about from a YouTube video (1) by user going by the name “ColdFusion,” whereby there was an image of the technology (presumed patented) [see ~1:55 of video]. 

 

Image of technology from video link:

 

Here (link) (2) appears to be the patent.

 

Managing to get that technology re-worked for SARS-CoV-2 would be a task of its own. I presume you have to figure out what chemical goes through the blood that is an indicator of SARS-CoV-2 infection and have a drug released to counter-act proliferation of host infection by SARS-CoV-2. I would need to study more biochemistry in relation to that in order to figure that out. I have a suspicion that the chemical of interest to be detected relative to SARS-CoV-2 would be what the device was designed for, relative to SARS-CoV-1.

 

Until then, it appears to me the thing to do would be to re-arrange human resources from around the world, such as scientists and medical staff, give them hazardous materials training relative to SARS-CoV-2, and having them go to parts of the world most impacted at the moment: United States of America and Europe. Have them start working on treating people (relative to the U.S.A., I presume the American Medical Association would find a way to credential them to medically diagnose/treat), analyzing things, and figuring out how to bring down prevalence. Maybe even give them hazardous materials suits. 

 

Furthermore, it might be worthwhile to take those in military of whom have biological, chemical, etc. training [similar to a Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Specialist (3)] and have them moving around to bring down prevalence.

 

Furthermore, it appears to me that there is a significant issue that’s sprouted up as of late. The Food Drug and Administration (FDA) seems to have stopped various aspects of people requesting genotyping on themselves. It appears to me that it would be worthwhile for those of whom are high risk factor individuals to have genotyping done on themselves to examine whether or not they have ACE2 receptors, which is the binding receptor for SARS-CoV-2. 

 

I would think rather than continually getting checked up, people would want to use Southern blotting technique to check if they do or do not have ACE2 receptor expression, whereby an absence of such (I presume) means they would not be susceptible to infection by SARS-CoV-2.

 

Sure, maybe genotyping wouldn’t necessarily be the best thing, though, so maybe actually people getting a tissue sample from their nose to check for expression of the ACE2 receptor would be best. Maybe not. Maybe there are people of whom don’t have ACE2 expressed in their nose-throat (nasal-oral system?) but have it expressed in the intenstinal tract (supposedly, ACE2 receptors exist in the intestinal tract and there’s evidence to suggest the virus may attach in the intestinal tract [4, 5] to infect a host). 

 

Regardless, as the FDA appears to have stopped people from allow companies to do genotyping/blotting-analysis on people of whom request such, then it appears the thing to do is that people need to learn to do (in that the Elizabeth Holmes’ technology cannot be up-and-running any time soon) is use various blotting techniques (such as Southern blotting) to analyze whether or not they have the ACE2 receptor.

 

That would mean people would have to learn to do the laboratory techniques at home/etc. for a work-around of the FDA regulation. Another idea is have scientists sell people to kits and make really, really good instructional booklets/videos so that people can do their own blotting analysis. Another idea is an in-person salesperson of whom sells the blotting technology, sees if the person does the blotting technology correctly, and if there are problems, then buys the technology (say for 1.00 US dollar) back and to show how the technology is supposed to be used to do the blotting analyzes (and then sells back the equipment for 1.00 US dollar — hopefully people would be kind enough to do such a low sell as a work-around of the FDA situation).

 

The primary people to target for analysis of having the ACE2 receptor would be those of whom are most susceptible at the time: High-risk individuals. I am not well-read on the presumed "significant correlating factors" *

 

From there, figure out how to shelter (isolate from the virus) those individuals. I theorize that there would be a reduction over time in SARS-CoV-2 cases/deaths from there.

 

So... "increased isolation (social distancing) of those with high risk factors over time" vs. "SARS-CoV-2 cases/deaths over time"?

 

If someone wants to make a graph for it, please do.

 

 

References

 

(0) "Would throwing various members of the American populous into fallout shelters help alleviate SARS-CoV-2? - Engineering and Applied Science - Science Forums." Author: Dennis Francis Blewett (user: dennisfrancisblewett). Thread creation date: January 6th, 2022. <https://www.scienceforums.com/topic/38809-would-throwing-various-members-of-the-american-populous-into-fallout-shelters-help-alleviate-sars-cov-2/>. Accessed: January 18th, 2022.

 

(1) “Theranos – Silicon Valley’s Greatest Disaster - YouTube.” Author: Dagogo Altraide; Channel: ColdFusion. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CccfnRpPtM>. Accessed: January 18th, 2022.

 

(2) "United States Patent: 10130283.” Patent title: “Medical device for analyte monitoring and drug delivery.” Inventors: (1) Holmes, Elizabeth; (2) Roy, Shaunak; (3) Howard, John; (4) Wang, Chengwang. Assignee: Theranos, IP Company, LLC (Palo Alto, CA). Patent number: 10130283. Main site: <https://patft.uspto.gov/>. Accessed: January 18th, 2022.

 

(3) “CBRN Specialist | goarmy.com.” <https://www.goarmy.com/careers-and-jobs/career-match/support-logistics/safety-order-legal/74d-cbrn-specialist.html>. Accessed: January 18th, 2022.

 

[4] "Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Pathogenesis." Harrison, et. al. Dec. 2020. Trends in Immunology. <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7556779/> Excerpt: "...Accordingly, gastrointestinal illness has been frequently reported in patients with COVID-19 [40,41], consistent with the recovery of SARS-CoV from stool samples of patients with SARS [42], suggesting a potential fecal–oral route of transmission for these two CoVs..."

 

[5] "COVID-19 infection detected in deer in six Ohio locations: Scientists unsure if wild deer could be SARS-CoV-2 virus reservoir -- ScienceDaily." Authored: December 23, 2021. <https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/12/211223113202.htm>. Accessed: January 18th, 2022. Excerpt: "...Research has shown that the virus is shed in human stool and detectable in wastewater..."

 

Notes

 

* I do not believe in that causality exists. As such, I use the term "significant correlating factors" rather than "significant contributing factors," which such term is a term I learned from a course in psychological statistics (I presume PSCH 343 in maybe the year of 2010) at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The concept of "significant contributing factors" is similar if not the same to the term "high risk factors."

Edited January 18, 2022 by dennisfrancisblewett

[dennisfrancisblewett]

Based on some research, it appears that the chemical that would release the drug, relative to the Elizabeth Holmes patent, would be an antigen. What antigen that is, I'm not sure. It's presumed that it's the antigen that gets tested for as of late in whatever home kits are being presented to the public, such as at Walgreens. It's probably whatever antigen the Elizabeth Holmes device was designed for relative to the SARS-CoV-1 epidemic/pandemic.

 

What drug gets released? Dexametasone, maybe. It's probably whatever drug was meant for release relative to the SARS-CoV-1 epidemic(?)/pandemic(?).

 

Regardless, I have my qualms about continuing to assist with resolving the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. I do not support slave rhetoric. I feel as though I am being treated as a slave in life. I've held a demand for political asylum, and my demand has been disregarded. My civil rights have been violated. I'm not too interested in pursuing this topic any further. I would like my legal remedies.

 

It seems to me that people ought to start attacking the legal system (by physical means) in release of Elizabeth Holmes (in defense of person) in the hope that she assists with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Seriously. Start attacking them in self-defense. It appears the next step if for Elizabeth Holmes' technology to step-in and resolve things. I'm not interested in figuring out the patent and making my own version: It seems the pharmaceutic industry stole her technology to make stuff for diabetes.

 

Elizabeth Holmes has a fair amount of technology: If wielded properly, she could probably make a way more powerful virus and start attacking people. What's been worrying me about her is whether or not she went to MIT as a child and whether or not she's some kind of earlier version of Washu Hakubi. The relative aspects of space-time and the multiverse lead to very strange interpretations of what may be going on in reality.

It seems a public rebellion against government would suffice in this situation, whereby people start claiming in self-defense to release Elizabeth Holmes from her conviction. 

I have enough issues in life, such as questioning my reality. I hold a view that I'm in a holonomic dimension ("Christverse"), whereby things aren't actually real. I've also considered that maybe, somehow, I'm going to revert to being exactly 18-year-old, on-the-dot by "forces that be" in a response to gross governmental negligence and the gross child negligence that I experienced. I'm not mentally ill: I'm a critical thinker, and I think very different things about reality than many other people. For instance, I consider the Elizabeth Holmes situation may be a ruse. I'm not sure. Regardless, I'm not interesting in seeking a lot of peace and quiet: I've been homeless, wrongfully harassed as though I should be considered disabled/ill, unable to get stable housing, been dealing with finding a way of living (yet not wanting to seek significant work for U.S. dollar because I dislike the U.S. government and what it stands for), etc. etc. etc.

Edited January 21, 2022 by dennisfrancisblewett