Jump to content
Science Forums

They stole my work!


Dubbelosix

Recommended Posts

So yeah, the scientist who published work saying our universe came from a nano scale crystal structure, I'm sure he was influenced from my writings. Whether or not the model was taken from my quora page, I remember clearly mentioning this as a third phase state of the universe from a pre big bang phase from the moniker https://www.scienceforums.com/profile/94080-dubbelosix/.  I concluded, that if there was a pre big bang phase, then it had to come from a condensate and while speculative further, if the classical laws held, this condensed all-matter phase could have came from a more fundamental "quantum crystal structure." This is just a barrel consequence of the model chosen under condensed matter physics, known as phases of matter. If the pre big bang phase was a liquid all matter region, then the phase it came from would have been known as a crystal solid. The mesophase of the "liquid crystal' was an idea I postulated from genuine work and I feel there is more than a chance this scientist has come across my stipulations and tried to make it an independent work. There is one main reason I think this, I never made a mathematical model for the crystal form of the universe because it already relies on a strange concept of a previous big bang phase, so convincing anyone this is really what happened seemed so unconvincing that I left it as a curious footnote.

 

My work,the semi classical Friedmann eq. And pre big bang phase

https://www.quora.com/q/vtikdwnzcqjjlems/The-Semi-Classical-Friedmann-Equation

 

The recently published" Independent" model

 

https://lm.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.techexplorist.com%2Ffirst-milliseconds-crystal-formation%2F38498%2F%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR3UrbGTkkIQbnEvPA8lT7GqaY7KPaSV5fkVi3pMIUr7_zM_qHjuRhnfdqM&h=AT3Z3vwF2oQIYYb-jTwNNkb2CTcdR-nL81z_fTDEB3YLAAOEPZSTj4YV08YRvnPEZhdBuolys3opliTPOr4qN3VY3HF8rK0Y7R9X3Qoa6bDxKznCd6sCYOHAS30ySxGyI4rDHa5DYxx_hwOvSkHNC1QOYcn-d_dhhWdr4RkEz6YVxmc0PCh5asoxcdCGctlDfohIyevm8GZz3UyITJt30jX3pk1Q_keHLLhvu8s4qJ-UWJ-HZ4LUnh2k1bMrC4KxaeNo8fWGeNhNxhrXWJO_0riAm857ORyVH3dfsPxJq3ZdVF2_2pv5gCwzIlMwwGYAQNn8x7hbOmbBhdhdgn6tz__cBOoHdugfagizfa0uQWm1F_qABtl0ZzcVFl1FIvJkaNcqYNFr-_3Y0qwZdFMffC399r42ozLYin60QrwLUIvqGJdhGyC4aGpJexEBwtLdvaQW4sg0_MO1UhVyYY7gMLXKny3LHiSFO7MrWZZduQRil75zsnb7Yqs1sXGYlQQ9UvtxEUVtp-hyjYPgo07rrsZuN04

Edited by Dubbelosix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

Dubbel, It happens all the time people always are stealing my work, welcome to the club you are smart enough that people want to use your stuff, Patent it or Copywrite it then you can sue t

2 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

Dubbel, It happens all the time people always are stealing my work, welcome to the club you are smart enough that people want to use your stuff, Patent it or Copywrite it then you can sue them if they use your work.

I'm going to contact a lawyer and see what can be done about this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dubbelosix said:

I'm going to contact a lawyer and see what can be done about this!

Ya there is a 1 year rule, if you have a work that is younger than 1 year old you can still press legal charges on them or sue them for 1 year after that you must have a copywrite or patent to press legal charges.

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Dubbelosix said:

Oh I will! If not, in theory I already have because my work is dated and published on this site and my quora homepage. It should be impossible for any reasonable mind to warrant the notion I came up with this idea first!

Well legally if the post is over 1 year old it doesn't matter if they use it, after that you have to patent or copywrite it because after 1 year the law won't do anything. Ya, that's like you know singularity university has synthetic viral synthesis(http://www.singularitysymposium.com/viral-nanobots.html) on their website that is mine people will steal your stuff. Does that look familiar to this thread(http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=76588)?

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dubbelosix said:

I can argue that it was published, as it has been recorded on the Internet. Published, officially is another issue, but I can prove I wrote this stuff first, which is important and vital if I am to maintain that this was stolen officially from me.

How long ago did you publish that on Quora? In the eyes of the law that's all that matters. At the point that you don't patent or copywrite it for a year it becomes public domain.

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Dubbelosix said:

I'm going to contact a lawyer and see what can be done about this!

You can mail a copy to yourself by registered mail. That establishes the date of "discovery" and will protect you from any "prior" claim.

Just place the unopened dated envelope in a safe place, just in case of a dispute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, write4u said:

You can mail a copy to yourself by registered mail. That establishes the date of "discovery" and will protect you from any "prior" claim.

Just place the unopened dated envelope in a safe place, just in case of a dispute.

Obama changed that you can't do that anymore and press legal charges on someone for stealing your work(https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/newsletter/inventors-eye/president-obama-signs-america-invents-act).

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

Obama changed that you can't do that anymore and press legal charges on someone for stealing your work(https://www.uspto.gov/learning-and-resources/newsletter/inventors-eye/president-obama-signs-america-invents-act).

Looks like I am behind the times. But I am sure the old way will still give you protection. The point of authorship lies in recorded dates , whether by e-mail or by snail-mail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I'm quite sure this crystal mesophase has been "adopted" from my work, another study in academia seems to be on the same premise from my unification papers. For those who have followed my studies for years, they will know that as a consequence of the pre big bang model, I further explained that the model indicates that the universe came from a liquid condensate. Below this, the crystal mesophase. Now scientists appear compelled by this type of idea, whether this has been stolen as well, I am not entirely certain, but one thing is certain, it says more or less everything I said on the tin: https://lm.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fphys.org%2Fnews%2F2021-04-physicists-phase-bose-einstein-condensate-particles.html%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR0aVk-ppcnjwt8xBFv6JpX0PxshqZsu9EEpQQ76kdKwxBh5_INV0vwLoe0&h=AT1wCEpXYGaTCrxjyaWL_3ibuUcgv8aNRltQiLVUKulTEWKemvYlWnT96LEdO3BZW6MmCM_9H7DZeR8v1CG1AZnWUzdn1ruudt7IXK5EnALoxHhTOMSeKT0C_rLAUiOZrRjOGZOCRvlGAbVcffSb_6EHc15da2C4ftyzyUfRTkOapq0rLCyBKbfPxwxhwUiXBd3XCpaBCvpnlrf7aEyWOQQnV9G6Z7ivf82rZItQbul_QExOGyZ9muY2IsJmX4XXkjeAuMVmkfPMSFW5WKltZjQ7dDTHR5lY9mTqWQ-xEUCpfOfIaOMY7ongNBT45AWHrbVBLH2WmppEDE6vt6DvoXGLhic4AZsQp60ZNDOVwGSwrrCTuIU7dWoc01UTf8E_V2ejH43E2CvIelJZ9Bm91VGEHY9XC2Qvbn08InsFhyz_M8MEyfp-LAf7M2Yn8im1WI9fqlwF_GjR1mr2n98vUfDDLsU9jArymrpqU7_FX_a-rnxDw27MGJQRS01J8SUTaiduNlOYXaT4LNiTgKbrfZZiE061thPbK-Sl-6cS_Olk9dWOPnzESx1gNUzk5PRwAKhPbIoJg-4a49Br4_pAYQjGmVkjW2sEns_KzaQm5l-scGtY4BMl4_WNiN6q3eL_KoetqyD2uHx2R1K2BL4

In fact, it is crucial for this idea in the cold big bang condensate phase model, science could be moving forward in everything I theoretically suggested! The giant single state particle has of course got to do with the idea of the photon condensate - the mesophase below this us the crystal phase, which was first suggested by me from the Helmholtz thermodynamic phase transitions suggested by Motz and Kraft, all I did was take the model further and predicted the crystal phase from a semi classical Friedmann equation. I said the big bang did not come from a point. More like the Lemeitre primordial egg to avoid singularities. Because of this prediction, I further stated that black holes probably follow the same quantum rules, a consequence of the same physics I suggested for the pre big bang model, basically the black hole (is) a photon condensate.

 

Edited by Dubbelosix
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...