Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, write4u said:

I guess you are not familiar with Brian Greene then?  Would you lend yourself to crackpottery?  Why do you expect other physicists to commit crackpottery?

Brian Greene

Brian Greene
Brian Greene, February 28, 2012.jpg
Brian Greene, February 28, 2012
Born
Brian Randolph Greene

February 9, 1963 (age 58)
Nationality American
Alma mater Harvard University (BA)
Magdalen College, Oxford (D.Phil)
Known for String theory
The Elegant Universe
The Fabric of the Cosmos
The Hidden Reality
Spouse(s) Tracy Day
Awards Andrew Gemant Award (2003)
Scientific career
Fields Physics
Institutions Cornell University
Columbia University
Doctoral advisor Graham G. Ross
James Binney

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Greene

What is the equation for a string field and I will give you a pass on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

What is the equation for a string field and I will give you a pass on this?

String field theory

Calabi yau formatted.svg

Quote

String field theories come in a number of varieties depending on which type of string is second quantized: Open string field theories describe the scattering of open strings, closed string field theories describe closed strings, while open-closed string field theories include both open and closed strings.

Quote

In addition, depending on the method used to fix the worldsheet diffeomorphisms and conformal transformations in the original free string theory, the resulting string field theories can be very different. Using light cone gauge, yields light-cone string field theories whereas using BRST quantization, one finds covariant string field theories. There are also hybrid string field theories, known as covariantized light-cone string field theories which use elements of both light-cone and BRST gauge-fixed string field theories.[5]

Quote

A final form of string field theory, known as background independent open string field theory, takes a very different form; instead of second quantizing the worldsheet string theory, it second quantizes the space of two-dimensional quantum field theories.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_field_theory

It appears then that there is no single field equation that describes all fields.

I do like the concept of Causal Dynamical Triangulation (CDT), proposed by Renate Loll et al

Causal dynamical triangulation (abbreviated as CDT) theorized by Renate Loll, Jan Ambjørn and Jerzy Jurkiewicz, and popularized by Fotini Markopoulou and Lee Smolin, is an approach to quantum gravity that like loop quantum gravity is background independent.

Quote

This means that it does not assume any pre-existing arena (dimensional space), but rather attempts to show how the spacetime fabric itself evolves.

Quote

There is evidence [1] that at large scales CDT approximates the familiar 4-dimensional spacetime, but shows spacetime to be 2-dimensional near the Planck scale, and reveals a fractal structure on slices of constant time. These interesting results agree with the findings of Lauscher and Reuter, who use an approach called Quantum Einstein Gravity, and with other recent theoretical work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation

Edited by write4u
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, write4u said:

String field theory

Calabi yau formatted.svg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_field_theory

It appears then that there is no single field equation that describes all fields.

I do like the concept of Causal Dynamical Triangulation (CDT), proposed by Renate Loll et al

Causal dynamical triangulation (abbreviated as CDT) theorized by Renate Loll, Jan Ambjørn and Jerzy Jurkiewicz, and popularized by Fotini Markopoulou and Lee Smolin, is an approach to quantum gravity that like loop quantum gravity is background independent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation

"String field theory was to be the theory of interacting strings. To describe interacting objects, you need a quantity called the Lagrangian (that's L in Kaku's equation). ... Now Michio Kaku's equation is clear. It is the Lagrangian describing the interaction of strings."

 

String-Field-Theory-Equation-2.gif

 

I hope this has humbled you, maybe you don't know as much as you think you know, now watch the lectures.

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, VictorMedvil said:

"String field theory was to be the theory of interacting strings. To describe interacting objects, you need a quantity called the Lagrangian (that's L in Kaku's equation). ... Now Michio Kaku's equation is clear. It is the Lagrangian describing the interaction of strings."

 

String-Field-Theory-Equation-2.gif

 

I hope this has humbled you, maybe you don't know as much as you think you know, now watch the lectures.

Thank you for that explanation, I have run across Kaku's equation but have not yet studied the narrative. 

As to in-depth knowledge of string theory, as an ex-musician, I never claimed anything but interest in the subject. I will watch the lectures unless you piss me off with unnecessary ad hominem .  You will find me quite humble, but I don't like to be humiliated, OK?

Edited by write4u
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, write4u said:

Thank you for that explanation, I have run across Kaku's equation but have not yet studied the narrative. 

As to in-depth knowledge of string theory, as an ex-musician, I never claimed anything but interest in the subject. I will watch the lectures unless you piss me off with unnecessary ad hominem .  You will find me quite humble, but I don't like to be humiliated, OK?

Good Girl!

download.jpg

Do you want a biscuit?

 

P.S. hahahaha, I would pay money to see the look on your face when you read this, now go watch the lectures.

Edited by VictorMedvil
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/9/2021 at 12:31 AM, write4u said:

I guess you are not familiar with Brian Greene then?  Would you lend yourself to crackpottery?  Why do you expect other physicists to commit crackpottery?

Brian Greene

Brian Greene
Brian Greene, February 28, 2012.jpg
Brian Greene, February 28, 2012
Born
Brian Randolph Greene

February 9, 1963 (age 58)
Nationality American
Alma mater Harvard University (BA)
Magdalen College, Oxford (D.Phil)
Known for String theory
The Elegant Universe
The Fabric of the Cosmos
The Hidden Reality
Spouse(s) Tracy Day
Awards Andrew Gemant Award (2003)
Scientific career
Fields Physics
Institutions Cornell University
Columbia University
Doctoral advisor Graham G. Ross
James Binney

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Greene

Wikipedia? Seriously?

I cannot believe I actually have to say this here, but ALL wikipedia is conjecture BECAUSE ANYONE can edit the articles contained therein WITHOUT ANY peer-review by research-driven, scholarly or academic people or groups. Therefore it has ZERO weight as proof. This is what is known as an unverifiable citation, which is one of the FIRST THINGS you learn in BASIC English Composition classes REQUIRED for one to even BEGIN to conduct proper research.

Did you fail that class or did you simply not attend or? *Rhetorical Question, I Don't Care*

If you cannot be bothered to approach science from the PROPER channels, might I suggest a job as a tabloid column blogger? *Again, Rhetorical*

~Rasti

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Rasti said:

I cannot believe I actually have to say this here, but ALL wikipedia is conjecture

 You are wrong! That is not a refutation . Just because some of wiki is conjecture doesn't mean that all of wiki is conjecture. There is no library on earth that deals only with truth and no conjecture.

Are there any libraries that have only truth? Get real,  all you need to do is separate the wheat from the chaff. 

Do you believe Brian Greene, a credentialed physicist, would allow falsehoods to be posted? 

When YouTube posts a live on campus lecture by a credentialed scientists is that conjecture?  If you doubt Brian Greene's credentials and his in person "live " lectures, call the Columbia University and ask them if he is a ghost or a real scientist.

Do you believe Brian Greene would allow falsehoods to be posted? 

 

Edited by write4u
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...