Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Well the big bang was a theory based on gravity that could not pull but push. A multiverse theory has nothing to do with this.

The curvature of space and uniform of motion would be relative to this reference.

The thing about The/A Big bang is that it's only a theory based on one perspective in our galaxy.

When Multiple of them could of occurred over a wide range of area and time.

Anything that could bend that much space would be similar to a black hole reaching another black hole.

Pinching the space itself and propelling it outward at speeds enough to change the state of matter.

Similar how carbon can be created extremely dense on how the atoms are arranged.

What ever "Dark matter is; it would probably be most similar to something like a network of some sort."

To your last statement ; There is a network , a Cosmic Web . Look it up , and take your time . Then let me know whay you think of the Cosmic Web .

Edited by current
Link to post
Share on other sites

Gravity obviously pulls. The proton is but a strange orbit of pullers that acts like a pusher but that's an illusion. See the quark arrangements and assume that the quarks are made of planck volume spheres. A string is one dimensional, a brane is a cube but stuff aka material is made of spheres at the most basic level when two ontological spheres (or neutrinos) of equal volume and density overlap a spherical graviton with centripetal drag one planck volume in size is created right in-between the two neutrinos. It's up to Victor and 006 to design the algorithms for the Jupiter brain I have given them much more regimes and proofs than you could possibly fathom.

Has the graviton been proven to actually physical exist , by physical means ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

current, on 06 Sept 2020 - 12:11 PM, said:

 

Has the graviton been proven to actually physical exist , by physical means ?

 

 

 

How would I know ya'll don't actually do anything important as far as what I see from my 4D interactions. Right now we are having a 2D interaction and as far as I know you speak coherently but don't interpret any of this in your mind's language at all. That has been proven physically.

Explain again , in other words . Your not making any sense here .

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as what I see in my world, nothing is even being done about this paramount ontological number bug.

I get what you are saying ; because they can't really understand that the physical is the essence of mathematics its self . Until this happens we will never truely understand our Universe and therefore any other possible Universe that might exist .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without seeing a very exclusive kind of math as the language of nature, as the mind of God, one is forced to act out of sin because without that math wrote language is meaningless and the psychological sciences succumb to the brain jackers. You can't prove that a hallucination isn't a controlled object swimming in swarms between synaptic signal am

To your last statement ; what's the point of hallucination ? Is BB( big-bang ) an hallucination .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallucination could be used as providence without real victimization in a simulation or nanite induced hallucination. We are designed with needs that others cannot understand, this design flaw leads to victimization IF AND NECESSARILY WHEN YOU TAKE ACTION YOU WILL PAY for falling for the trap, taking the bait as it were. Point 1, point 2 is that the big bang is not just a mere emotionless moraless matter of observationally and physically confirmed semantics, it is also the eventuality of murphy's law applied to the definition of dimensions.

 

So you think we are in a computer generated Universe ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

current, on 06 Sept 2020 - 1:58 PM, said:

 

So you think we are in a computer generated Universe ?

 

 

I do not think it's possible for a mathematical representation to feel, no. The substance of the mind has to be the electrons of ontological origin. I do believe that entanglement and in vitro neuron replacement nano surgery can both induce false readings from any of the 5 senses.

 

To your first statement ; its not about " feel " . WithOut the Real Physical 3D existence , a computer could never exist , no matter how far back you go to gods origin and the Fundamental Elements origin . Mathematics in and of its self does not create anything ; its simply not capable of doing so , my reasons are above . Mathematics helps in understanding something , Mathematics is a tool of knowledge . Edited by current
Link to post
Share on other sites

We have to come to terms with the fact that the creation is a timeless and chaotic phenomenon even if we can prove that everything within the particle horizon did not exist before 13.8 billion years ago, and even if there is a larger horizon there which I can define finitely, that horizon was just an eh of an older continuum. Now that's not to say that the quantum eraser isn't better than multiverse theory when facing the grandfather paradox, so God comes from the other direction in time, our future not our past. So it's brain has a nemesis, because there's the same number of electrons in reverse, but the pattern is slightly different in dimension 4 when looking at gravity in reverse the feelings are different. Think Superman's nemesis Bizarro. I believe Tenet would go into that, in any case one would have to be able to experience linear relative time while at the same time experiencing reverse outer or true time, in order to be immortal. 1 billion years going backward, 1 billion years going forward, then repeat. Otherwise you will experience a big crunch (if you're nemesis) or a big chill (if you're descendant). And if both are doomed, than they are at war, and an organism at war with itself cannot survive.

 

 

Instead of a god , beings . Both genders , together . That's how I think about the possibility of being inside a brain(s) and mind(s) .

 

The thing is that both in order to manifest , need the energy and matter states to exist . Life uses minerals and the Suns energy . Life Energy is different from Galactic and Quasar Energy and Matter . Life Energy Thinks .

Edited by current
Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of a god , beings . Both genders , together . That's how I think about the possibility of being inside a brain(s) and mind(s) .

 

The thing is that both in order to manifest , need the energy and matter states to exist . Life uses minerals and the Suns energy . Life Energy is different from Galactic and Quasar Energy and Matter . Life Energy Thinks.

 

There is an interesting idea, that I do not necessarily buy into but it's interesting, that is about the overall general large scale structure of the universe looks very similar to the structure of the brain. 

 

AND, like a brain these structures are in electrical (electromagnetic) and chemical communication within it, again, just like the brain.

 

And as with the brain a single neuron or synapse has no idea about the overall structure is doing, or even if it is doing anything (as an overall entity).

 

all we can observe is a tiny fraction of that universe, for a tiny instant in time, so we could never know what the larger function is or what the processes are. 

 

It would be the same as a single switch trying to understand the complex computer programming running on a huge computer, and the switch is one of trillions of switches in the computer. 

 

It is an interesting idea, possibly we are a tiny section of a intelligent brain in a being where there are trillions of such beings in a world, just like we have a tiny section of humans brains on earth. That tiny section of brain does not really see the bigger picture.

 

As for the big bang, there is almost not evidence (I say less than no evidence) that the big bang ever happened at all, the big bang was proposed years before any evidence that 'supports' the big bang was observed. Years before Hubble redshift for example.

 

In fact at the time of the big bang model being proposed, the concept and evidence for the big bang was from a passage in the bible, and proposed by a Catholic priest. 

 

The problem is we see everything in our world as having a beginning, a life and an end, so we try to justify the universe in those terms as well.

 

I don't believe the universe had a beginning, it just IS, it had no beginning, it has no end, and it is everywhere and there is no where where the universe is not. 

 

If you have a universe with space, then by definition there can only be one of them, because any universe with space will be in our space. 

 

We already live in a multiverse connected by space, we call those universes Galaxies. 

 

The universe is just an exchange of matter and energy and space and time (volume), energy is sometimes in the form of matter and that matter gives space a length property, so that energy (from being matter) is distributed over space (and spacetime), and when it is energy it is 'stored' over space and can only interact with matter.  

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3_0O-gpeYo

 

That is the link to the universe looks like a brain video.. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

current, on 06 Sept 2020 - 2:42 PM, said:

 

Instead of a god , beings . Both genders , together . That's how I think about the possibility of being inside a brain(s) and mind(s) .

 

The thing is that both in order to manifest , need the energy and matter states to exist . Life uses minerals and the Suns energy . Life Energy is different from Galactic and Quasar Energy and Matter . Life Energy Thinks.

 

 

 

 

There is an interesting idea, that I do not necessarily buy into but it's interesting, that is about the overall general large scale structure of the universe looks very similar to the structure of the brain.

 

Yes

 

But understanding at the same time , moment , that the brain is Life Energy and that Cosmic Energy is necessary for Life to manifest its self .

 

Earth , our Earth , our Planet , is a perfect example .

 

Minerals are important to the Health of living things ( besides water and air ) .

 

 

 

AND, like a brain these structures are in electrical (electromagnetic) and chemical communication within it, again, just like the brain.

 

To your last statement; more than these , Life . You don't mention Life .

Link to post
Share on other sites

A recent document recently declassified by the CIA. It's 29 pages.

 

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf

 

The Consciousness Matrix. The universe is composed of interacting energy fields, some at rest and some in motion. It is , in and of itself, one gigantic hologram of unbelievable complexity. According to the theories of Karl Pribram, a neuroscientist at Stanford University and David Bohm, a physicist at the University of London, the human mind is also a hologram which attunes itself to the universal hologram by the medium of energy exchange thereby deducing meaning and achieving the state which we call consciousness.

 

With the respect to the states of expanded or altered consciousness such as Gateway uses, the process operates in the following way. As energy passes through various aspects of the universal hologram and is holographic images being conveyed and projected upon those electrostatic fields of  the mind and are perceived or understood to the extent that the electrostatic field is operating at a frequency and amplitude that can harmonize with and therefore "read" the energy amplitude of the electrostatic field which comprises the human mind determines the configuration and hence the character of the holographic energy matrix which the mind projects to intercept meaning directly from the holographic transmissions of the universe. Then, to make sense of what the holographic image is "saying" to it, the mind proceeds to compare the image just received with itself. Specifically , it does this by comparing the image received with that part of its own hologram which constitutes memory.

 

By registering differences in geometric form and in energy frequency, the consciousness perceives. As psychologist Keith Floyd puts it:

 

"Contrary to what everyone knows is so, it may not be the brain that produces consciousness--but rather, consciousness that creates the appearance of the brain..."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...