Jump to content
Science Forums

Evolution


Guadalupe

Recommended Posts

there is no scientifical evidence for the soul.

by soul i believe you mean conciousness.

conciousness is relatively new in our history.

 

here is a quote from another thread:

soul.

 

let's say the eye was an organism all by itself. everything the eye does revolves around sight. therefore, the eye's soul would be sight.

 

i like to think that music is my soul, i am constantly counting in my head, and tapping with my fingers when i'm not directly listening to it. i find music in senses that are not auditory, and it is my true passion. what i love.

 

if we work with/at our souls, they will live on through LEGACY. NOT AFTERLIFE.

after-life is pureply metaphorical.

yes, this is my opinion. but i believe it was aristotle who said the eye/soul analogy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well it seems to me that it wasn't too long ago (in our history)

we just started logging time 2000 years ago....

we drew in caves thousands of years before that....(i don't know exactly how long)

my guess is, it was a slow evolution. it didn't just appear in someones mind one day.

it took millions of years for us to be able to think the way we do today.

our minds are still evolving. who knows what's next, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean with consciousness the "inner voice", or the fact that you can recognize yourself in a mirror - be "aware" of you own existence?

 

In my opinion, I have to agree with orby that consciousness evolved to be what it is because there must be some benefit in it. Maybe self-preservation has something to do with it. But we're not alone in that regard. I'm sure dogs and apes and quite a lot of other animals are "aware" of their existence, in which case they'd also qualify to have a "soul", not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oh and p.s. since the soul is not a translucent entity that arises from our dead bodies and transports our legacy to a place called heaven, it is also not something that we RECEIVED. conciousness evolved. we still are.

 

O.K. But, from where did this conciousness evolve from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you know how evolution works? Over millions of years our brains evolved... I would argue that some of us are more conscious than others....

 

Hi niviene. It has been argued, “Evolution vs Creation”. Sounds very much like the chicken or the egg story. But, what if evolution was indeed created? Would this mean that the "Creation" came first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, Guadalupe. :hihi: Everything is possible; however, some things are more probable than others, depending on your methods of reason. It is possible that creation alone is true; it is possible that evolution is true; and it is possible that a combination of the two is true. I lean towards the latter, but it's important to keep an open mind and consider all possibilities. Religion is a person choice, and what you believe is obviously very important to you - all that matters is what seems right to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi niviene. It has been argued, “Evolution vs Creation”. Sounds very much like the chicken or the egg story. But, what if evolution was indeed created? Would this mean that the "Creation" came first?

 

Yes. One could rectify evolution with christian concepts of creation simply by saying "the way God created everything was through evolution." Thats all fine and dandy. There is, in fact, no way to argue away the possibility of an omnipotent entity beyond perception.

-Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...There is, in fact, no way to argue away the possibility of an omnipotent entity beyond perception.

-Will

Not quite - consider:

 

1) God created everything.

2) 'Everything' includes not only matter, but space as well.

3) Nothing can exist outside of space.

4) Therefore, God, if He/She (I prefer 'It', the only reason God will have a sexual description, would be if there was a 'Godess' as well) exists, it would have to be in space.

5) Being omnipotent implies, by the very nature of the word, having infinite energy at your disposal.

6) The only thing with infinite energy (not quite, but the closest to) in the universe, is the universe itself.

7) Therefore, God is the universe, and the universe is God. They are inseperable.

8) Therefore, we as humans, are actually little bits of God. We might be God's brain, seeing as we are bits of the universe that can question the nature of the universe.

9) Then again, looking at Dubya, we might be somewhere close to the ultimate end of the digestive tract.

 

The point is, if there's an omnipotent being, we MUST be part of it, due to the very nature of the word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...