write4u Posted February 20, 2021 Report Share Posted February 20, 2021 (edited) Paragraph 1 question: Are both entangled particles subject to the same Higgs field? Paragraph 2 question: What is the relationship between the universe and the metaverse? Paragraph 3 question: Is the metaverse a mirror image of the universe consisting of only entangled matter? Paragraph 4 question: Does the state of the metaverse affect the state of the universe? Paragraph 5 question: What does all this have to do with a metaverse which is separate from this universe? 3 hours ago, tonylang said: This is because individuality is most fundamentally not a product of this universe but of the metaverse. Reading your concept reminds me of the De Broglie-Bohm pilot wave theory which is nonlocal in essence, but does not assume a metaverse separate from this universe. It proposes a singular Wholeness. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Broglie–Bohm_theory As far as Life is concerned, according to Hazen it is not mysterious nor exceptional in occurrence. It can be found everywhere on earth in the most extreme localities. These conditions were not fine tuned for life, life was fine tuned to the local conditions. Life is an extremely evolved self-referential sensory biological pattern which does not require a fine tuned universe to emerge. On the contrary, life is fine-tuned to local conditions within the greater universe and possibly even in cosmic clouds. https://www.dazeddigital.com/science-tech/article/50157/1/explained-a-gas-cloud-with-a-heartbeat-has-been-found-in-deep-space-black-hole In and on earth alone there are tens of thousands of organisms capable of thriving in conditions which are absolutely fatal to other forms of life. Extremophiles can only live in extreme conditions and Tardigrades can adapt to a range of inhospitable local conditions, including space. Polychaetes inhabit both extremes in temperatures in the deep ocean abyssal plain and trenches on deep sea methane icemounds and around black smokers. Squids and octopuses have adapted to high sulphur content in their environment and have copper based blue blood. The environment was not adapted to allow for squids and octopuses. They adapted to the environment! Edited February 20, 2021 by write4u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
write4u Posted February 20, 2021 Report Share Posted February 20, 2021 In fairness, this may possibly support your proposition: Scientists say there’s a portal to the fifth dimension SCIENCE & TECHNEWS A new study claims to have found an explanation for dark matter, but relies on the discovery of a particle which leads to another dimension 8February 2021 TextBrit Dawson Quote The sci-fi hypothesis was published in a new study in The European Physical Journal C. It suggests that the particle can provide an explanation for dark matter, which has never been observed directly but is thought to account for most of the universe’s mass. Researchers say particles can travel across the whole universe, including to the fifth dimension. https://www.dazeddigital.com/science-tech/article/51876/1/scientists-say-there-is-a-portal-to-the-fifth-dimension Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted February 20, 2021 Author Report Share Posted February 20, 2021 4 hours ago, write4u said: Paragraph 1 question: Are both entangled particles subject to the same Higgs field? Paragraph 2 question: What is the relationship between the universe and the metaverse? Paragraph 3 question: Is the metaverse a mirror image of the universe consisting of only entangled matter? Paragraph 4 question: Does the state of the metaverse affect the state of the universe? Paragraph 5 question: What does all this have to do with a metaverse which is separate from this universe? The answers you seek begins here: Posted June 30, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
write4u Posted March 2, 2021 Report Share Posted March 2, 2021 (edited) On 2/20/2021 at 12:42 PM, tonylang said: The answers you seek begins here: Posted June 30, 2018 Again, what does Dark Matter have to do with the LINK hypothesis? Some kind of molecular Entanglement? What does that even mean? Edited March 2, 2021 by write4u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted March 3, 2021 Author Report Share Posted March 3, 2021 18 hours ago, write4u said: Again, what does Dark Matter have to do with the LINK hypothesis? Some kind of molecular Entanglement? What does that even mean? Posted August 2, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted March 16, 2021 Author Report Share Posted March 16, 2021 The LINE hypothesis suggests that there is no multiverse, however, there is an underlying Hilbert-space called the metaverse. In a metaverse, universes evolve by a process of Darwinian evolutionary natural selection, not unlike the evolutionary process we see in viable ecosystems for life in this universe. The universe or verse in which one finds one’s self is but one viable species of verse on this tree, or complex of verses, which has evolved to host individual life by its unique laws of physics. Many verses will not have this fortune of circumstance. A verse with no evolved mechanism by which to instantiate individual life may nonetheless inherit this capability from the evolutionary information imprinted in metamatter by other compatible verses which in turn inherited likewise from others. This is different from a multiverse in that, within the metaverse, verses may actually evolve, inherit, and in a sense compete, and even consume one another for existence, not unlike the way galaxies do, all on a time scale which makes the age of one's universe seem infinitesimal by comparison. Within the metaverse complex, the state or health if you will, of a verse is indicated by whether it is contracting or expanding and the rate of each. So where does the big bang fit in? The metaverse is essentially an ecosystem where verses are the evolving species. However, resist the temptation to over extend this analogy with life as we know it. The goings on in the metaverse is governed by physics that are necessarily unfamiliar to the physics within any universe that it may produce. What we refer to as a big bang is but one of many metaverse phenomena which only hints at the goings on in this unfamiliar realm of nature. The appearance of the big bang to us as some kind of an explosion is as nondescript as the way a rain drop falling from the clouds may appear to a microbe caught therein, attempting to describe the hurricane, planet and solar system from which the drop emerged. In this, the microbe is just along for the ride. The degrees of freedom at work in the metaverse are far from fathomable by humankind. This is not a limitation of intellectual capacity, but rather a limitation of the type of intellect that is possible in ones universe. The unique laws of physics of different verses manifest not just fundamentally different types of host forms, but also their very own unique type of position of view (POV). This is due to the unique degrees of freedom and topographies which define a particular verse and its laws of physics. Further, as in our universe, all life in each unique verse can only instantiate that same unique type of POV to become the kernels, the seeds of evolution for any living individual hosted by that universe regardless of the specifics of the indigenous ecosystems therein. Each viable verse is a different realm for instantiation and produces living individuals which can evolve to fathom its own living circumstances in that verse as humankind may in this universe while finding the nature of other verses impenetrable. You see, intellect is but one tier of an inverted pyramid of capability which evolves from the seed that is the instantiated POV. However, in the rich pallet of possibilities for life described by the metaverse, there are no doubt verses which evolve living beings which can transcend some of these limitations. This may ultimately prove to be such a verse. A Metaverse by its hypothesized nature permits universes like ours to evolve with uniquely tuned degrees of freedom that seem too specific to be randomly emerged, this is because they are not, they are evolved. Like species verses do not lose evolutionary information like inanimate entities do. As in living beings, via the entanglement spectrum, each verse can store and inherit evolutionary information imprinted by its living tenants to metamatter. This imprinted cloud-storage repository of intra, and inter-universal evolutionary information mediated by natural laws of conservation of information, such as the monogamy of natural entanglement, not only guides the evolution of species, but also influences the evolution of verses to become finely tuned, unique habitats for life in the Darwinian complex of the metaverse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
write4u Posted March 16, 2021 Report Share Posted March 16, 2021 (edited) 6 hours ago, tonylang said: This imprinted cloud-storage repository of intra, and inter-universal evolutionary information mediated by natural laws of conservation of information, such as the monogamy of natural entanglement, not only guides the evolution of species, but also influences the evolution of verses to become finely tuned, unique habitats for life in the Darwinian complex of the metaverse. That is assuming the universal values and functions are attuned for life instead of life being attuned to universal values and functions. Darwininian evolution of living organisms is dependent on "natural selection" of objects attuned to universal properties, such as quarks, electrons, etc. Even if there is a metaverse, they are all made up of a common language of axiomatic fundamental mathematical values and functions. Edited March 16, 2021 by write4u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted March 28, 2021 Author Report Share Posted March 28, 2021 The monogamy of entanglement is the law of nature that isolates an entangled state from intrusion by non-participant, unindoctrinated entities. So how is it that the organelles in any given cell manage to share a common entangled state to the exclusion of other entities that may violate the cell wall? Isn’t the law of monogamy being violated? No, the law of monogamy isn’t being violated any more than the law of gravity is being violated when we construct and fly 100-ton airliners carrying hundreds of passengers thru the atmosphere. As is always the case the laws of nature are never violated only manipulated and utilized to achieve a desired behavior. So it is in the living cell. To understand the living cells utilization of a common entangled state think of a cruise ship at sea, it either has an onboard wireless communications transceiver (ham-radio, etc.) or it doesn’t. A ship with such a device may allow its hundreds of crew members each in possession of their own hand units (talkies) to communicate with one another but also it permits the ship as an entity to communicate and share its state information with the cloud that is the outside world. In this scenario, the crew shares a common channel of communication that is isolated from intrusion by some common degree-of-freedom defined by some uniquely quantifiable aspect of the electromagnetic spectrum. Usually, that property is electromagnetic frequency modulation combined with a layer of encryption derived from a private encryption key for added security. In the lab today we understand the promise of entanglement as a secure encryption protocol primarily because of its monogamistic properties. We see that we may use the public and private key approach for encrypting and decrypting information securely. Likewise, the cell utilizes a sort of private encryption key process to indoctrinate new entities manufactured within the cell from the cell's own DNA to become participants, new organelles within the cell. This private key bestows upon newly minted entities a common shared degree-of-freedom defined by each individual cells’ specific quantum entanglement frequency (QEF). The QEF is a uniquely quantifiable aspect of the quantum entanglement spectrum. It is exposed only via the cells entanglement molecules which at this stage in the evolution of earth-life have likely been fully incorporated within the molecular structure of the cell’s DNA. It is through the utilization of the cells' entanglement molecules that the individual's unique QEF is made available as a private key for the indoctrination of new cellular organelles. In our cruise ship analogy, consider a responsible crew member is tasked to program secure hand units (talkies) with the ship's unique frequency and encryption key and then to distribute those units to each new member of the crew. This enables each new arrival to become a participating member of the ship's staff, thereby animating the ship as a self-contained living organism. In the living cell, it is hypothesized that similar activity is undertaken when a ribosome manufactures a new protein line from its’ RNA and DNA within the cell’s nucleus. All new organelles are imbued with a common aspect of the entanglement spectrum. This property is exposed by the entanglement molecule within the cells’ DNA and permits the otherwise inanimate organelle to utilize the cellular natural entanglement connection to metamatter. In so doing, the organelle is not entangled but like the crew members on the ship, is in communion on some level with other cellular entities. Also, they share cellular state information with the universal cloud-storage of metamatter accessible by other naturally entangled hosts anywhere in this universe. Today, in the modern living cell, this is a complicated process to describe and document but it is nonetheless recognizable through this analogy. This describes the natural implementation that is the predominant difference between a living entity and a non-living one and the instantiation of the individual by natural entanglement. Further, the monogamy of entanglement enforces the integrity of an existing entangled state such as the position-of-view (POV). It is in fact nature’s last line of defense against infiltration upon any entangled state. This effect can essentially be thought of as a self-destruct mechanism. The concept of defense by self-destruction appears at times in implementations both technological and natural. In human affairs when vital information needs to be isolated or otherwise protected from infiltration at any cost we wire the asset for destruction with explosives or such. In nature, the integrity of a law of conservation is often when such an effect is observed. In the case of an entangled state, it is indeed when the conservation of information, one of nature’s fundamental laws, is threatened with violation is when the asset, the entangled relationship, forfeit. If one wired an asset to explode upon infiltration or upon specific violation then one would also need to broadcast this fact to interested parties for it to be an effective deterrent. Alternatively, one would need to erect obstacles of a defensive, offensive, and perhaps cognitive nature to actively keep out unwanted intrusions upon the protected asset. This is exactly what living hosts (species) are. This evolutionary arms race to protect the individuals’ vital asset the POV began with a simple cell wall in the early proto-cell. This cell wall may be metaphorically compared to the posts of timber erected by early peoples that settled in a new land. They often erected a defensive barrier to keep out environmental threats and also to protect vital assets on the inside of the encampment. Today these walls have grown and evolved substantially both in nations and in the living cell. In the living cell and in any other host all systems are evolved to support the protection of the POV, the entangled state maintained by the entanglement molecules within each cell. In complex (multi-cellular) hosts the POV is the entangled state-maintained specifically by the entanglement cells (EC) which must be protected from intrusion or infiltration while sacrificing many other non-EC cells in due course. Another apt metaphor for this natural implementation is the starship enterprise on the popular iconic TV show star trek. Though the enterprise bristles with offensive as well as defensive and cognitive systems, both living and non-living, the last line of protection is to isolate or protect the information content inherent in the enterprise from infiltration. This is accomplished similarly by annihilating the ship. So it is that the well-known self-destruct system of the enterprise is ushered into service at the last possible moment. Likewise, the monogamy of entanglement as previously stated is nature’s last line of defense of the law of conservation of information in this universe. Make no mistake this is purely a cause and effect mechanism of natural law. Quantum coherence and its monogamistic properties are observations made in the laboratory and are given labels, names. No one should suggest at this juncture to know the fundamental underlying implementation in nature of these phenomena. However, plausible well-considered hypotheses are welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
write4u Posted March 28, 2021 Report Share Posted March 28, 2021 (edited) 5 hours ago, tonylang said: A ship with such a device may allow its hundreds of crew members each in possession of their own hand units (talkies) to communicate with one another but also it permits the ship as an entity to communicate and share its state information with the cloud that is the outside world. The "talkies" you speak of are the trillions of microtubels which make up the heart of the neural network. Of course this is not wireless but each MT processes EM data and forwards the data to the rest of the network. Edited March 28, 2021 by write4u Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted April 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted April 14, 2021 Presumably, there is a first time for everything. Consider then this earths first life, that is to say, the first time you or I or any individual is instantiated as a living being in any ecosystem, perhaps in this ecosystem, Earths ecosystem. This may seem like a strange notion to consider but realize that no matter what your current belief system one cannot deny there has to have been a first instantiation for each individual even if you think this life is that first time, the only time, the last time you will live. Further, let us call this first-ever host of life in earths ecosystem and perhaps first in this universe Cell-1. What individual was hosted by Cell-1? Who was it that came into being so many billions of years ago entangled by this first living host here on earth? Was it me? Was it you? Was it someone we now know? A single cell being in nature as much a living being as any other, how then could we identify this or any individual position-of-view including ones own? Since the natural process that populates this universe with living beings is as all natural processes are, ubiquitous, prolific, and may repeat whenever, wherever conditions are favorable, this first individual may very well be among the living today. If you are having trouble comprehending this notion it is likely because you are thinking of individuality from a second or third-person perspective, the visible tangible behavioral perspective. Instead, consider individuality from ones own first-person position-of-view. As with you or I, the form that any living being instantiates does not change the fundamental nature of ones position of view which is presence not experience. It is only ones form, placement, and time in this universe that vary. Make no mistake the POV is not to be confused with a point of view which if had by a given species or host is a function of that particular host and is nothing more than the skills manifested by that particular entangled form. Skills manifested perhaps by cognition of a complex brain and/or nervous system, or a lack thereof. A unique position-of-view is what defines the individual regardless of form. It is very difficult for hosts such as humankind to imagine the being of other life forms. So how does one imagine a beings POV even ones own? It isn't easy, particularly since there has never been anything one could do to change ones instantiated form, apart from terminating ones own life. Even then, with no natural persistent memory of ones past instantiations, it is very difficult to comprehend this natural implementation. However, one first step may be to realize the natural entangled mechanism of life and to develop technologies for the detection of the living POV and record individual inter-longevous histories. If in fact the first host ever to exist in this universe had entangled your QEF, in nature, you would have been every bit as alive then as you ever were in any subsequently instantiated host including ones current form. When we ask; what individual was cell-1? What is it that is being identified if not cell-1's host form, its body the cell, and its functions and skills? The LINE hypothesis suggests it is ones unique value of some quantifiable degree-of-freedom of the entanglement spectrum the QEF, call it QEF-1 if you will. Whatever the actual value that QEF-1 turns out to be for an individual, let's say cell-1 for example, that unique value of the QE spectrum will always instantiate cell-1's POV its position-of-view, POV-1. no matter where, when, or what the design, biology, or technology of the available host. Long after that first host had decayed back into the anonymous atoms that had first contributed to its form its QEF, QEF-1 has likely reinstantiated on countless other occasions since then. With each instantiation, in each life, QEF-1 by entangling matter to metamatter brought the same first-person position-of-view into this universe, POV-1, by providing a place and a time to something that otherwise has neither. No second-person perspective would recognize the individual that is POV-1 from the outside, in fact as with current earth-life there is often no means by which any individual could recognize itself as a recurring entity. Particularly if it were a single cell. However, perhaps if billions of such individual POV'S came to entangle highly evolved hosts possessing sufficiently high intelligence and perhaps if a critical mass of such individuals were to become enlightened, no doubt kicking and screaming every step of the way, to the reality of their living circumstances to develop technologies adequate to the task of analyzing and detecting the entanglement spectrum and the standing entanglement wave it manifests in living beings, such a species could one day measure, quantify, and identify the unique living POV of the individual no matter ones physical form. With the identification and comprehension of naturally invasive ideas often comes an ever-increasing level of control. In this case, it is control over the instantiation of ones own being, which is ones’ form, placement, and time in this universe. Nature cannot be assigned the property of purpose. Nature doesn’t implement individuality in the manner in which a cognitive species such as a human might. However, the ubiquitous natural universal process of instantiating a living being in any given environment ought to be quantifiable and understandable and may be described in terms of natural cause and effect. So how does the natural process of instantiating a living being resolve which QEF, who’s QEF is entangled to cell-1? Whose first-person position-of-view, whose being, exists first, second, third, etc. Clearly, life doesn’t seem to us to be sequential but how can we know for certain? As a thought experiment, consider that Earths’ hypothetical Cell-1 undergoes mitosis and creates a cell-2. According to the LINE hypothesis, both must necessarily entangle stem-metamatter since at that time there can be no metamatter in existence which was imprinted by host species from Earths' virgin ecosystem as there would as yet have been no deinstantiation (Decoherence of an emerged individual), no death. Death is necessary to provide disentangled imprinted metamatter for future generations of life in any ecosystem. Further, if cell-2 later divides to create a new cell; cell-3 before cell-1 dies then cell-3 will, as did its two living relatives, also entangle any viable host to stem-metamatter to instantiate yet another original POV never before instantiated in this or perhaps any ecosystem in this universe. Why? Because Cell-1, if it is anything like a modern cell, likely has a mechanism like DNA to transfer its hosts' design information physically generationally and so each host offspring, each relative, be it familial, special, or ecological, imprints upon metamatter with a diverging degree of similarity. All of this coherent cellular and QEF state information stored in metamatter attracts future generations of genetically similar hosts to entangle this metamatter. Presumably, the individual is unaware of any of this as are even complex species such as present-day human beings. Alternatively, consider if cell-1 instead had disentangled, died before cell-2 divided to produce cell-3, then the LINE hypothesis suggests that this newly minted host (cell 3, grandchild of cell-1) would be more likely to reinstantiate its bygone relatives' QEF (QEF-1). Host cell-1 and 3 are in this scenario generationally, physically related due to their common DNA, and cell-1 over the course of its lifetime has imprinted metamatter, as do all living entities, with information from both their physical component (DNA, etc.) and also from its’ unique entangled degrees-of-freedom (QEF-1). The QEF is not part of the cell nor is it an aspect of metamatter it is of the entanglement spectrum. The entanglement spectrum exists as a distinct implementation of nature with properties, characteristics, and degrees-of-freedom which define it as such, not unlike the electromagnetic spectrum. These three elements of nature operate in concert to make individuality and life possible and mobile (teleportable) in this universe. QEF-1 now uninstantiated and unentangled, mediated by the monogamistic rules of quantum coherent interaction becomes available universally for future instantiation with viable hosts. So cell-3 (grandchild of deceased cell-1) with DNA more compatible with deceased cell-1's existing residual metamatter imprint than not, will more readily attract or enter into an entangled state at cell-1’s QEF-1 and its existing recently disentangled metamatter in lieu of widely available stem-metamatter. So the individual, the POV that instantiated previously to host cell-1 is now reinstantiated to its own offspring host cell-3. The possibility of familial reinstantiation is likely highly dependent upon the actual resolution of the theorized imprinting upon metamatter by the living cell. For familial reinstantiation ones fidelity of teleportation may need to be above some pivotal value (i.e. .75 or greater above the classical limit), any lower and only species and inter-species entanglement may become likely. Nonetheless, Cell-3 the individual the world sees as the grandchild of deceased cell-1 could once again host POV-1. Such is the nature of life. It is only when there is no compatible imprinted and simultaneously disentangled metamatter and compatible hosts available that a newly emerged host will entangle stem-metamatter to establish an original (to this ECO system) position-of-view. In nature the laws of conservation mandate that every interaction has an effect and induces a change in its participants. Whether or not we can sense, measure, or understand the interaction or the effect it produces. On human scales, the gentlest touch transfers heat induces friction, deformation, etc. Electromagnetism changes the atoms and electrons it interacts with or there would be no electronics. A subatomic particle entangled with another or with others interacts regardless of distance or time (even when in different temporal frames of reference). By this natural mechanism metamatter, ones non-corporeal life-matter if you will, is changed as it entangles with your cells over the course of each lifetime. By this process individuality emerges in otherwise inanimate matter and gives rise to a living being that has either never lived in this ecosystem before or may have never lived in this universe previously, The implications for individuals currently instantiated on Earth, as in any viable ecosystem, are that ones future place (reinstantiation) in this eco-system is all but guaranteed barring some global-scale catastrophe which erases all life on earth leaving only the possibility of reinstantiation elsewhere, barring such a catastrophe the entire DNA pool of earth-life will attract your QEF to available metamatter to host you once again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted May 12, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 12, 2021 What is individual presence? Presence is that natural phenomenon that you are experiencing at this moment. As unintuitive as it may seem, ones' presence has very little to do with one's consciousness, mental state, or even one's physical form or any of its emergent functions. In fact, in nature, a single living cell is enough to instantiate the presence of a living individual. Surely, one must realize that your presence can exist even if you cannot experience it. Whether it is because your host has not evolved to experience or recognize its own presence, or because you are comatose or under general anesthesia or circumstantially otherwise not functioning to full capacity. Still, if you are among the living, your presence, your instantiation persists. So what is this natural phenomenon unlike any other in normal experience which establishes a living individual position-of-view? That phenomenon is the Solution of State (SoS). The underlying implementation of this universe and all possible verses is called the metaverse. The metaverse can be described as an ocean of quantum wave functions (QWF's) that exists in a state of perpetual superposition. As such, the metaverse possesses the potential to procedurally render all possible states and realities, while rendering none. That is until SoS are instantiated therein. SoS's are circumstantially emergent transformations of more fundamental forms of information in any verse. As turbulence in a vast ocean of water circumstantially emerge and interacts, so too does a solution of state (SoS) inform all manner of metaverse phenomena which become the seeds, the pebbles tossed into the metaverse ocean if you will. SoS's are the metaverse amalgams of information, once teleported into this universe, undergoes quantum superposition collapse to manifest all of the entities and their defining degrees of freedom of ones' space-time and thereby create the indigenous reality of any universe. SoS become rendered entities such as electrons and quarks and all of the fundamental particles, known or unknown, and the forces which compose the reality of ones' universe. These fundamental entities, once collapsed from the metaverse by appropriate SoS's, combine and evolve to become atoms composed of electrons bonded to protons and neutrons which produce molecules of matter. This interaction also renders all of the fields and properties of this universe such as the electromagnetic and QE spectrums. These emergent properties combine to form the entanglement molecule (EM), an interstellar molecule that naturally establishes a coherent state with non-local metamatter. In the right habitat, under the right conditions, this molecule may evolve to instantiate a position of view (POV), a living individual. A POV is also a type of SoS which, to a much lesser extent, further procedurally collapses natures' superposition state within this universe to render an individual's living reality. Solution's of State also exist in this universe, whether manifested as a subatomic particle, or as a QEF instantiated as a living POV in a living being, both establish a place and a time and thereby a state or a life in this universe, to something that otherwise has neither. Metaphorically, as a pebble tossed into a vast body of water creates a series of effects referred to as ripples, so too does each SoS instantiated into natures' ocean of QWF's create a series of effects we refer to as reality. Any of these realities may be simultaneously rendered, but cannot be simultaneously experienced, observed, or measured. Further, these renderings cannot instantaneously interact, except via the degrees of freedom (DOF) of the QE spectrum. So where does an SoS originate? To understand the origin of SoS one need not comprehend the intricacies of the metaverse which are fundamentally incompatible with any intellect indigenous to this universe. Solutions of state also exist in this universe in the form of any rendered state able to specifically interact with another state to precipitate a newly emerged state. Not all states can circumstantially fulfill a specific condition in the same way; therefore will not produce the same if any outcome. Like a key in its lock, particular states are evolved to interact and render or resolve other particular states to produce a new state, entity, or phenomenon. As the far wall in the double-slit experiment participates as an SoS to collapse the emitted probability wave to render into the observers' reality the particles of electrons or photons, so too does the observers' POV contribute, however weakly, as SoS within that environment to render those same particles. This is no different from the mundane effect of illumination whereby most matter acts as a SoS for photons of ambient light in any environment. However, far less mundane are metaverse phenomena such as the big bang. A big bang requires a certain type of SoS, unfamiliar to this universe. Such SoS is capable of collapsing the metaverses' QWF to spawn a new universe. Such SoS interactions produce much more than mere ripples in the metaverses' ocean of QWF's but cause the biggest splashes imaginable. Such collapses instantiate a new realm of physics, and thereby, a new realm of reality. Such realms of reality evolve in the metaverse by the laws of metaverse physics. The ecosystem that is the metaverse complex is defined and governed and evolved by its own laws of interaction, an understanding of which would be a heavy, but perhaps not impossible, evolutionary lift for any instantiated living forms it produces to imagine. It is upon the formation of viable universes, such as this one, which define unique relationships and laws of interaction and of change known as physics, able to evolve environments which may become viable ecosystems to instantiate the SoS defined by the degrees of freedom of the quantum entanglement spectrum (QEF) to instantiate individuality, life. This ongoing rendering of reality and its zoo of instantiated entities by the metaverses' unique laws of physics is experienced by all indigenous POV's as this universe. In the absence of the introduction of SoS's into the metaverse complex, like a perfectly still ocean of water, neither space nor time as we perceive them, exist. However, upon the introduction of appropriate SoS's, the reality we call this universe comes into existence for all matter living or not. The possible interactive, measurable, and observable variations between individual experiences of rendered entities are severely limited by the pre-rendering caused by electrons and other such primary observers (PO) in nature. All renderings occur simultaneously everywhere within this universe. However, for each solution of state, for each individuals' POV, nature renders each reality relativistically (with each POV a factor) and thereby manifests an individualized rendering of the local environment and of the measurable, observable changes caused by those states. It is this local rendering of ones' observable, measurable rates of change in local renderings of reality which we refer to as time and its observed relativistic dilations. As Einstein discovered, relativity is the description of the dilations or differences between each individually rendered rate at which change occurs relative to the speed of light. The closer to this speed limit an observer moves the slower the internal rendering appears to outside observers. Two observers in the same reference frame will render their environment significantly similarly but nonetheless, individually. To the environment, a living host entangled at one QEF is identical to that same host entangled at any different QEF. There is no classically detectable outward influence or behavior of the POV that can immediately affect one's surroundings which includes one's host. because the host, the species is a part of that local environment. No causal difference between one POV and another is available to the outside world, only to the individual is the difference rendered manifest by the isolation of individuality. It is only the isolation of individual instantiation and also of experience centered upon one's position-of-view that affords a clear distinction of self, being, and individuality via the acquired skill of self-awareness in each being capable of fathoming the distinction. The isolation imposed upon the individual POV by a protective composite, and often disconnected host, is a solitary condition which the instantiated being strives to overcome. This is widely achieved through communication in all of its forms which includes mobility. From the single living cell to bacteria to vegetation to human beings, genetically all strive to break the isolation imposed by this fundamental living condition of life. This journey out of the isolation of the basic natural entangled state of life not only began but continues with the living cell in all of its forms and has evolved to become the prolific, diverse eco-system we see today. Communication requires the development, usually via evolution, of structures and functions that augment the basic implementation by which natural entanglement is hosted. Evolution no doubt favors the group, which also benefits from communication. This is not to suggest that the perception of individuality cannot be clouded perhaps by intimately integrated communication systems of both a technological and biological nature. Such augmentation could fade the experiential distinction between self and others. Even so, make no mistake, there can be no classical infiltration of the individual POV as there are strict natural monogamistic laws of quantum coherent interaction that guarantee the isolation (or forfeit) of the individual entangled state that is the position-of-view. Most often the information of self that is acquired during a lifetime is dissipated from the individual upon deinstantiation. Some information of one's past instantiations may persist in the memories of other instantiated beings for a time or within indelible works or, in the archival repositories of advanced societies. However, currently with no means by which any reinstantiated QEF can be identified, for now, the anonymity of the reinstantiated individual remains assured. It would require the development, evolutionary or technological, of persistent personal individual inter-longevous memory or the societal archiving of such information, coupled with the capability to identify and distinguish the unique individual QEF to then inform reinstantiated individuals of their past histories. Also with this capability would emerge the even more profound capability to influence one's future instantiations by manipulating aspects of ones’ fidelity of teleportation (FT), and further, to eventually develop controlled universal travel via targeted reinstantiation as advanced enlightened species in this universe already would. In so doing a threshold would have been crossed in the maturity of a species as the accompanying enlightenment transforms life as we know it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted May 31, 2021 Author Report Share Posted May 31, 2021 (edited) Mach, Hawking, and Cherenkov; three names one account; A hypothesis is self-validating when it unifies previously separate well-known phenomena by its proposed underlying predictions and structures. The LINE hypothesis proposes that at the Planck scale, the PH regimes around which pyrine form within particles of baryonic matter, while within a local medium such as glass, produce a region of information deficit as gravitation due to its sequestered debytons (dark matter). This deficit effectively and measurably reduces the local rendering rate (LRR) of reality which informs change, ergo; time, and the local speed of light within that medium. This Planck scale information deficit projects into the atomic realm to produce the effect known as a refractive index. It is hypothesized that Black holes radiate Hawking radiation only when the universal rendering rate (URR) is diminishing as it does during universal contractions. As the URR diminishes, so does the vacuum speed of light, which increases while the URR is increasing during periods of universal expansion. Consequently, massless photons may become restricted while within some materials to velocities below the current vacuum speed of light in this universe. While, by the same mechanism, under particular conditions, massive particles are simultaneously able to travel within that same local medium at or closer to the vacuum speed of light than does mass-less particles therein. This simultaneous conjunction of speed differentials is informed by the LRR of that medium. The LRR is informed by the information deficit demanded by the pyrine that compose all matter. As massive baryonic particles in this condition translate between PH regimes faster than their own emitted massless photons, such photons become liberated from their normal bound nuclear bonds. Not unlike a passenger not strapped into their seat in a decelerating vehicle, photons in this condition are liberated to produce a particular type of light emission. This emission is widely known as; Cherenkov radiation. It is suggestive that under particular circumstances, Hawking radiation is emitted from the maximally dilated PH regimes called black holes and Cherenkov radiation is emitted from the minimally dilated PH regimes called Planck holes. These emissions both occur as the rendering rate of reality in this universe which informs the current speed of light varies for PH regimes at all scales within a local medium and in the vacuum of space. Such information deficits occur as information transitions between this universe and the metaverse at the PH of baryonic pyrine and also at the EH of black holes. In each case, the rendering rate of change, ergo; time is brought to equilibrium with its respective environment by the transition of a proportional amount of information from within their respective PH regimes. In all cases, this radiation or gravitation compensates the universal information budget. By this mechanism, as complexity rises in this universe and this universe begins to contract, black holes universally proportionately emit their bound information which was captured at the higher URR. In particles, a similar equilibrium produces a space-time inflow of information from the metaverse observed as various emissions like the luminous shockwave of photons that is Cherenkov radiation. The LINE hypothesis suggests that Cherenkov and Hawking radiation are both phenomena produced by the same underlying information deficits fulfillment paid to the universal information budget each on opposite ends of the PH dilation or QE spectrum. The QE spectrum is the inter-universal medium that defines gravitation, radiation, matter, space, and individuality in this universe. Mach’s Principle; "Local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe", is a tacit acknowledgment of the interrelated dynamics of matter with the universal information budget (UIB). Mach’s principle suggests that there is an information influence between the large-scale universe and the local scale of inertia, momentum, and gravitation. The LINE hypothesis suggests that Mach is on the right track, but doesn’t explain this ubiquitous universal interaction. Mach’s principle describes the same information deficit fulfillment being paid to local space via the PH which informs the UIB of the large-scale universe. In rotating frames, the UIB causes an information deficit in the space occupied by baryonic matter. This is due to gradients in a rotating body's sequestration of debytonic (dark) matter particles. Faster moving baryonic matter sequesters proportionately more debytons than slower-moving baryonic matter. An information deficit also occurs by the gravitation of free massless debytonic (dark) matter in the vacuum of space. Hence, massless debytonic PH regimes are the mass-independent basis from which an increase or decrease of the mass within massive baryonic particles should be compared and measured. Mach’s principle suggests that universal gravitation is in some way responsible for a centrifugal force. This is not strictly the case; centrifugal motion is largely due to a physical exchange of kinetic energy between particles to produce an exchange of velocity. Centrifugal motion may occur via physical contact of incident matter particles that are in contact with a transient surface. If no contact exists between the two bodies including air contact or electric or magnetic influences, then the vulnerable body would rotate only diminutively. This minimal rotation is not due to the well-known centrifugal force, hence, must be defined differently. Let us call this minimal independent force, the Mach force. Einstein demonstrated this Mach force in his pendulum precession experiments. The Mach Force is very weak on human scales. It is produced by the information deficit paid to the UIB of local space by matter particles of rotating systems. The UIB taxes the local faster-rotating pyrine of matter at the peripheries of a rotating body in greater proportion to the information tax paid by matter towards the slower rotating center of mass. On the cosmic scale, it is also debytons, but not bound within matter particles, that hold rotating galaxies and clusters thereof together. Hence, Mach’s centrifugal force which acts upon you within a rotating space station, and the gravitational force that binds matter together in galaxies attributed to debytonic (dark) matter are both ultimately produced by the same underlying information drain of space by debytonic matter whether sequestered within particles or free in the vacuum of space. This occurs on vastly different scales via the dilation of PH regimes small or large. It is the information deficits paid by all PH regimes to account in the UIB that creates all of the phenomena of this universe. This is the solution that explains Mach’s principle and the mystery of the non-Newtonian galactic rotation. Centrifugal force is the sum total of Mach’s Force plus any physical, electromagnetically transferred kinetic energy from a rotating body to vulnerable bodies therein. The LINE hypothesis proposes that by this description, the debytonic (dark) matter gravitation that confines galaxies now has its’ name; The Mach Force. The universal information budget is the mechanism by which small-scale structures communicate with the large-scale structure of this universe. Edited June 1, 2021 by tonylang Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted July 5, 2021 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2021 (edited) Great Voids: Seeking The Elusive Cosmic Eraser; The LINE hypothesis proposes that debytonic (dark) matter cannot create dark stars. This is because dark matter has no information accumulation, ergo; no rest mass, and therefore cannot create dark particles that can interact electromagnetically or can be captured gravitationally. It requires rest mass for the electromagnetic and gravitational accretion of matter to occur. Curved space-time does not capture or attract curved space-time, ergo; Gravity does not attract gravity. There can be no dark stars, however, there can be dark holes. Dark holes are formed by very fast-moving debytonic (dark) matter. Extreme events such as the universal instantiation and transition events (UIE and UTE) can produce the near luminal velocity of debytonic (dark) matter. This high velocity causes a diminutive information accumulation, ergo; kinetic mass to arise within affected debytons. This minuscule mass build-up, in sufficient magnitude, produces gravitational attraction within a sufficiently large population of debytonic particles, and possibly an eventual collapse into a dark hole. In baryonic matter, Newtonian gravitation (G) is always accompanied by mass due to the sequestration of a proportional amount of debytons within its pyrine structure. This is not the case for debytonic gravitation (GD). Once a dark hole forms it must remain at high velocity to persist as a dark hole. A dark hole is a massless high momentum high gravitation phenomenon. In a dark hole it is not high mass that maintains its’ high gravitation event horizon, but high momentum only. This subtle distinction bears odd fruit. Unlike a black hole, a dark hole cannot be attracted gravitationally as there is no information in a dark hole to attract. It requires mass to pay the information deficit called gravitation demanded by the universal information budget (UIB). Matter that subsequently falls into a dark hole is immediately teleported into the metaverse and doesn’t contribute or diminish the dark hole’s structural integrity. This is unlike black holes which maintain a considerable mass accumulation both outside and within its event horizon, a mass that directly informs its structure. Massless debytonic (dark) matter gravitation and momentum cannot fulfill this demand. Momentum in the absence of rest mass via a degree of freedom called metamatter, shared with the metaverse, is the dark hole’s superpower. A dark hole is massless despite its initial diminutive kinetic mass of formation. This is because upon the formation of a dark hole, upon the establishment of its event horizon, the conditions of extreme velocity of the debytons that precipitated the dark hole formation no longer exist within its event horizon. The information accumulation as mass dissipates inside the event horizon of the dark hole as a type of Hawking radiation very soon after its formation. This debytonic Hawking radiation occurs even within an expanding universe and induces no change in the momentum of the dark hole. The dark holes continued high velocity relative to space-time is required to maintain its high momentum and its event horizon. On the other hand, black holes require universal contraction to emit Hawking radiation due to the black holes’ high mass content which maintains a grip on its captured bounty. A grip that can only be overcome via an external reduction in the maximum universal speed limit, the speed of light. A reduction that occurs during universal contractions. However, dark holes have no such requirement. Due to a dark hole's lack of internal mass, its gravitation and event horizon is maintained only by the opportunistic coalescence of near luminal speed debytons. Dark holes are impervious to most universal influences. Like its constituent debyton particles, dark holes are weakly interacting and do not respond to most external stimuli. Like a great cosmic eraser, dark holes will gravitationally attract all manner of baryonic information states and matter and manifestations thereof. By the UIB, a dark holes’ event horizon persists by the balance between its high velocity and the current maximum universal speed limit, the speed of light. Any adjustment to either of these critical factors will result in loss of momentum and the emission of debytons as debytonic Hawking radiation and the deterioration of the integrity of the dark hole. Of these two factors, the more likely and immediate to change in this space-time is the dark holes’ velocity. Very few universal interactions can affect a dark holes’ path or velocity due to its weakly interactive nature. A dark hole is potentially an unstoppable gravitational cosmic wrecking-ball. What phenomenon might possess the wherewithal to influence a dark holes’ velocity and thereby begin its rapid destruction? It is free debytonic point particles, the likes of which construct a dark hole, that bears the seeds of its demise. The tax demanded by the UIB never goes on holiday. It is the immense clouds of debytonic (dark) matter throughout the cosmos that can spell eventual doom for dark holes. As dark holes pass through clouds of debytons at its native high velocity, not unlike photons whose path bends to compensate the UIB as they pass through gravitational fields, so too does the dark holes’ speed, momentum and path alter as the information deficit demanded by the UIB is paid. Like a dark ice-cube melting in the sun, a dark hole moving through vast clouds of debytonic matter, has its days severely numbered by this interaction. Consequently, relatively few dark holes survive in these cosmos. Dark holes can nonetheless survive within regions of low debytonic matter population and will reek havoc upon the local environment within its’ light cone. A dark hole will, over time, clear all detectable baryonic matter within its reach. Such baryonic deserts are described as; voids. Within voids, dark holes, with their high velocity, reign supreme as they erase all baryonic structure within their considerable reach. Such dark hole infested regions of space are made prominent by the absence of stars, gas or any observable baryonic information structure. Only the most opportunistic of dark holes will survive to the present day to be seen by equally opportunistic astronomers. No doubt A Nobel Prize awaits the persistent and fortunate astronomer that discovers this most elusive and unifying among natural phenomena, but what to look for? While there will be relatively few dark holes surviving to the present state of universal transition, fortunately there are numerous great and super voids that offer vast tracks of dark hole infested space-time that present ample opportunity for discovery. The perimeter of these mysterious swaths of missing baryonic matter where the darkness meets the visible structures of the cosmos of stars, nebulae, pulsars etc. presents the dedicated astronomer with an opportunity to witness a dark hole in the act of satisfying its voracious appetite. Formerly observable matter at the perimeter of voids will be seen to vanish as the void continues to grow as it has for epochs of universal time. Cosmological voids will grow nearly imperceptibly as the termites of the cosmos that are dark holes continue to expand their dark realm by opportunistically devouring any baryonic matter within reach of their considerable information drain into the underlying metaverse. I encourage all nimble minded astronomers of every ilk, to pursue this noble, career altering initiative at your earliest convenience. Edited July 22, 2021 by tonylang Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted July 6, 2021 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2021 Great and Super voids began as baby voids. The LINE hypothesis suggests that dark holes formed early in the universal instantiation and transition events. At that point in universal evolution, the entire universe was no larger than the Andromeda galaxy is today. At that time there was precious little space for information in any form to move through. After each UTE the universe is as an expanding debytonic (dark) matter egg composed overwhelmingly of numerous galaxoids, like egg yolks, most confined within a WOF halo of baryonic matter, floating in a vast ocean of debytonic matter. Once sufficient space expands into existence, it is from this dark matter that the population of dark holes is accelerated into existence. The baryonic matter that existed at that time existed only as wispy veins of electrons and protons and elementary combinations thereof weaved between the galaxoids from their own WOF halos. As the growing universe expands, space becomes increasingly available and galaxoids begin their long evolution into galaxies. Over the course of the next few million years, dark holes have a limited time frame in which they will consume any baryonic matter that happens into their dark, ever-winding path. At that point baby voids, excavated by these dark termites of the universe begin as excavated regions, no larger than a large nebula is today, but devoid of matter of any kind. Over the course of the ensuing 13.8 billion years of universal expansion, these baby voids will expand with the rest of the cosmos to become super voids of empty space consisting perhaps only of a precious few galaxies that opportunistically wondered into the void after the preponderance of the dark holes reign had passed. Observing dark holes in action is a retroactive time trip made possible by the extreme latency of electromagnetic waves traveling through space-time over the universes' entire history. It will require equipment, perhaps an order of magnitude more powerful than even the soon-to-be-launched JWS telescope, to have any chance of witnessing the unraveling of this relic of a cosmic archeological process unfolding at the edges of the voids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted August 6, 2021 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2021 Information Tunneling Its’ Way Into Life; How does one amalgam of information block or contain another? The bars of a prison cell, or the aluminum hull of the airplane, the earth beneath your feet, or the energy shells of the atom. It is by a property known as the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP). What causes the PEP? The LINE hypothesis proposes that it is the structure of baryonic pyrine projected from the Planck scale into the subatomic realm as quarks and their emerged information states that produce local exclusion zones in normal matter. How then do amalgams of information called particles tunnel in apparent violation of the PEP? Information tunneling is a phenomenon observed in diminutive ‘quantum’ amalgams of information states called particles. Tunneling revealed through the prism of the LINE hypothesis suggests that the tunneling of particles describes a relocation of a particulate Planck Hole (PH) regime through space-time across a distance that is, by all accounts impassable, contiguously occupied by other PH regimes classified as obstructions or barriers. What dynamics could account for the underlying mechanism of this puzzling behavior? It is the natural entanglement with metamatter via the QE spectrum that makes tunneling possible. Further, the information tunneling observed in particles is fundamentally the same mechanism by natural entanglement that instantiates the position of view (POV) of all living individuals throughout this universe. Natural entanglement instantiates, or tunnels the individual degrees of freedom (DOF) of the QE spectrum (QEF), you, to any viable host form within any viable habitat in this universe. It is this same mechanism that reinstantiates, or tunnels a particle to another location through a barrier. One might say that the tunneled particle has died (deinstantiated) and is born (reinstantiated) elsewhere in this universe. It is curious however, that such particles don’t appear to tunnel to more distant locations in space-time, but relocates to positions that are relatively local to the tunneling particles’ original position and, quite fortuitously, just beyond the obstructing barrier within the local system. Indeed, if hydrogen nuclei in stars tunneled, not into the energy exclusion zones required for nuclear fusion to occur, but to some distant location in this universe, stars wouldn’t shine. It is the local system, ergo; other particles that are local and within close proximity of the tunneling particle and also local to the obstruction between them that probabilistically biases the tunneling mechanism by natural entanglement. There are more abundant instantiations of more similar particles local to, and adjacent to a barriers’ confined space than far beyond it. Such particles have positions adjacent to the local barrier and probabilistically, non-locally biases the reinstantiation of other entangled particulate PH regimes to local positions. These shared entanglements to metamatter influences a tunneling particles’ entangled metamatter, to imprint a particles’ quantum entanglement-ID (QEID) with a fidelity of teleportation (FT) that is biased toward local positions in space-time. The DOF of particles entangled with non-local metamatter may define everything about a particle. By the dynamics of superposition and entanglement; the sharing of defining DOF between entangled particles in this universe with the non-local DOF of metamatter within the metaverse, all of a particles’ DOF may probabilistically, non-locally deinstantiate from one location to reinstantiate elsewhere, regardless of distance or barriers. Such locations essentially describe a tunneling particles indigenous ecosystem. An increasingly larger group of particles is less likely to tunnel. This is because a larger group of particles is less likely to define one common destination for teleportation in this space-time. A common destination for teleportation is essential for tunneling to occur, and also for the reinstantiation of individuality. A common destination shared by entangled PH regimes define a particulate state for information, and otherwise defines a wave state. This dynamic of natural entanglement via metamatter underpins the particle-wave duality observed in this universe. Further, the shared entanglement of particles in this universe with metamatter within the metaverse, produces a bias of the particles teleportation prospects, called the fidelity of teleportation (FT). This bias points to destinations local to other similarly entangled particles via in-common metamatter entanglement. By this mechanism, earths microbiome and ecology will bias the FT of its’ indigenous individual lifeID’s to instantiate similar host forms (species, etc.), regardless of the distance or barriers between them. This is because the entanglement molecule, the tunneling or teleportation-pad, if you will, is contained within living hosts. Such hosts, however mobile, are circumstantially more likely to be physically local to its indigenous ecosystem, if it still exists and remains viable. This teleportation of information via natural entanglement is the fundamental mechanism by which natural entanglement imprints a particles’ QEID, and also the living individuals’ lifeID to metamatter. This imprinted metadata mediates the FT of the living individual, you, and also tunnels subatomic particles to let stars shine in this space-time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted September 14, 2021 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2021 Emerging Out Of The Wild; Ascending out of Earth’s gravity well has been a long ongoing trial of imagination and innovation for humankind. Having witnessed various living fauna exhibiting the skill of flight for all of human history, it was long apparent that it was possible to resist gravity to some useful benefit. Humanity has since discovered and engineered effective means of scaling the ladder of the earth’s atmosphere in various ways. Ways such as balloons filled with lighter than air gases, and gliders. Then came powered airfoils as aircraft. Each advancement further cajoled the known laws of physics to utilize the atmosphere as a ladder of sorts to ascend the walls of earth’s gravity well to new heights. To date, rocket propulsion offers the only other means of ascending a gravity well, one that doesn’t depend upon the atmosphere as a mechanism of physical leverage. A rocket carries combustible propellants that, when combined and properly contained and directed, produce a repulsive exhaust that provides the rocket with its’ own physical leverage. A propulsion with an energy density adequate to leaving a gravity well of moderate intensity such as the earths. What all of these designs have in common is they all resist the full force of gravitation at every point in their climb out of a gravity well. The dream of anti-gravitation is to reduce or otherwise control the full effect of gravitation upon a volume of space occupied by a craft and its inhabitants. What all previous implementations not so obviously have in common, is they all use a form of matter that naturally sequesters the same proportion of debytonic (dark) matter within its pyrine structure. While humanity has witnessed natural examples of resistance to gravitation through flight in birds, bees and the like, might there be examples of anti-gravitation, living or otherwise? Perhaps surprisingly, yes there is. An example of anti-gravitation is the balance that nature implements in baryonic matter via a trajectory through a gravitational field called an orbit. An orbit, in its popular implementation, defines a trajectory which neither descends continuously further into a gravitational field nor ascends continuously higher out of that gravitational field. Instead, affected information threads a path of constant gravitational balance. This balance, not unlike a slipstream in fluids, is defined at every instant, and at every point in that trajectory by the information deficit paid to the universal information budget (UIB) by orbiting matter via its’ particulate PH regimes within baryonic pyrine. In truth it is not only orbiting planets, moons, satellites and space stations around large masses such as the sun that is in this state. Every bit of information anywhere in this universe is in some UIB state relative to every other amalgam of information regardless of location or trajectory. This information tax is paid at the Planck scale within baryonic matter via its particulate pyrine structure. Alter that pyrine structure to sequester more or less debytons per pyrine and you alter the gravitational potential it exerts. Is there anything in nature witnessed by humankind that exhibits such modifications? As with the seeming example of exceptions to the gravitational displacement exhibited by orbits, there are other hints of infractions to the gravitational rules exhibited by non-Einsteinian galactic rotations. Exceptions that hint that not all is well understood about baryonic gravitation and its fundamental underpinnings. The question becomes how can a balance be obtained not only within a closed orbital trajectory around a mass such as satellites orbiting the earth, but at any point within the vast extended contiguous gravityscapes of this universe? The LINE hypothesis suggests that baryonic matter has evolved in this universe to naturally ubiquitously sequester a consistent proportion of debytonic particles. A proportion that defines its normal Newtonian/Einsteinian gravitation (G). In the living cell, baryonic matter has since further evolved in this universe to augment this normal debytonic sequestration capacity of its pyrine with additional valence debyton particles, to create matter 2.0, life. The living individual position of view (POV) is an advanced iteration of the same fundamental mechanism that bestows gravitation to inanimate matter. As unintuitive as it may seem, the secret to the conundrum of anti-gravitation lies in understanding this natural evolutionary lineage of inanimate matter into living beings in this universe. Debytonic (dark) matter instantiates both gravitation and life to baryonic matter. With life, nature has provided the clue and means to the gravitational manipulation of baryonic matter. The instantiated POV of every living cell and collections thereof, requires the manipulation of the pyrines’ debytonic sequestration capacity. This debytonic manipulation is also the key to controlling gravitation. How could such a diminutive delicate entity such as the living cell have cracked this most tenacious, defining and elusive among the degrees of freedom of this universe? Such has always been the irony of nature. All phenomena have significance in the great tapestry of reality. Size bears only limited, circumstantial dominion. An understanding of how the living cell manages to manipulate its debytonic (dark) matter sequestration capacity while at room temperatures, and pressures, and with biological chemical energy levels, is the scientific singularity that elevates ascending cultures of high potential out of the wild state. This understanding will lead to the controlled sequestration of debytonic (dark) matter particles for technological use. Once collected and properly contained and manipulated, each debyton to anti-debyton annihilation temporarily alters the PH dilation of a proportional region of space. This is a region of space with reduced information deficit demanded by the UIB within any existing gravitational field. The LINE hypothesis describes debytonic (dark) matter particles as the primary conveyor of gravitation in this universe. Consequently, it is the sequestration of debytonic matter within baryonic pyrine which are the primary source of gravitation in normal matter, but what of debytonic matters antiparticle (ADM) and its effect on normal matter? No matter has ever been found to intrinsically not gravitate. This is only a result of widespread circumstance due to the universal ubiquity of debytonic matter throughout the cosmos. Gravitation exists where debytonic matter exists, and where debytonic matter is nonexistent, we see great voids. Consequently, if debytonic matter is introduced to its antiparticle, they would, as is expected, mutually annihilate. However, the only interaction of debytonic matter with baryonic matter is through its gravitation. Therefore, when debytonic matter annihilates, the only observable effect upon baryonic matter is the local loss of all gravitational effects therein. This loss of gravitation is due to debytonic matters' interaction with the Higgs field which establishes a high PH dilation. This increased PH bandwidth produced by debytonic particles does not cause the circulating bottleneck of information accumulation which would produce rest mass, and spin as well as the nuclear binding force. Ergo; no mass; no strong force; no energy; no explosion. Debytonic matter annihilation is due to the nullification or collapse of the gravitating QE channels established with metamatter due to debytonic matters' interaction with the Higgs field. What DOF of debytonic matter and of its antiparticle produces this hypothesized gravitational effect and outage? This outage is, in essence, a local PH dilation or contraction which temporarily attenuates information outflow from this space-time, ergo; gravitation. This particle called, the debyton, is not indigenous to baryonic matter and is the missing link between baryonic matter and its gravitation. Debytonic matter annihilations present a mechanism by which gravitation can be locally effected, ergo anti-gravitation. To control and sustain an anti-gravitational effect within a cosmic ocean of debytonic matter, local, controlled, periodic, debytonic matter annihilations will be required. Essentially, this describes an anti-gravitation engine or reactor. Increasingly larger debytonic matter annihilations would affect a proportionally wider area. The effect of debytonic matter annihilations, although significantly imperceptible by us, will temporarily undilate PH of the space within its blast or effective radius. Any baryonic matter within this radius will be temporarily cut-off from the effects of the local gravityscape, i.e., of the Earth and sun, etc. As a caisson submerged in the rapids of a flowing river isolates its contents from the effects of the current, so too would the brief local attenuation of PH teleportation bandwidth isolate its contents from the surrounding gravityscape. This will be seen as a temporary loss of gravitational influence of the environment within and upon baryonic matter within the affected radius. Theoretically, sustained debytonic annihilations would be necessary to sustain this effect. It is not feasible to liberate debytons from inanimate baryonic pyrine. The sequestration energy is far too great to be perturbed at currently accessible energy levels. The key is to liberate valence debytons from the instantiated entanglement molecule (EM). The excess debytons sequestered by its’ EM within every living cell are held only while the EM remains instantiated, and fully naturally entangled with metamatter. During this period called; life, methods can be devised which will liberate the EM’s valence debytons. Furthermore, a means of capture and containment and manipulation is required to make use of this resource. Else, the EM will deinstantiate and its debytons very soon return to their other natural state as free weakly interacting debytons in this universe. One initial method of debytonic liberation is to accelerate the instantiated entanglement molecule to very high velocities approaching the speed of light within an appropriate medium. Debytons at high velocity will begin to acquire kinetic mass. This diminutive mass build-up will begin to liberate valence debytons from their temporary, life hosting sequestration within baryonic pyrine of its’ instantiated EM. It then becomes possible to capture the transitioning valence debytons by adequate means. Hence, a short window of opportunity exists for manipulation upon debytonic liberation from the pyrine of instantiated EM. This is the same high velocity mechanism the LINE hypothesis proposes implements dark holes in the early universe. As the mass of affected debytons is elevated, they can be studied and eventually captured within appropriate apparatus. In time the secrets of the instantiated EM can be cracked and a more direct process of debytonic sequestration can be implemented. It is only the fortuitous state known as life, which permits this defining rogue particle to be hosted in normal matter, that presents a rare, otherwise impossible opportunity for control, and for the emergence of cultures of high potential, such as humankind, out of its’ wild state. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonylang Posted February 5 Author Report Share Posted February 5 The Darkness Of The Neutrino; In the year 1930 A.D. Wolfgang Pauli predicted the existence of an ephemeral undiscovered particle hypothesized to be carrying away missing energy from decaying radioactive nuclei. This particle was eventually detected by Reines and Cowan in 1956 and dubbed by Enrico Fermi the neutrino. The LINE hypothesis proposes that like all particles, the neutrino is a distinct type of particle and is also derivative of other particle types be they known or unknown. The neutrino is an intermediate particulate Planck Hole (PH) regime between the debytons (dark matter) and leptons. Like a lepton such as the electron, the neutrino hosts a pyrine structure that can retain information as mass but with a greater native PH bandwidth than any lepton. Additionally, like the debytons, the neutrino hosts a QE channel to metamatter but with a lesser PH bandwidth than the debytons. Unlike baryonic and leptonic pyrine, the neutrino pyrine sequesters no debyton particles due to its diminutive information accumulation as mass and therefor has undetectable charge. Some minimum amount of mass is required to produce the information circulation dynamics called charge, the strong force, and to sequester a proportional quantity of debytonic particles to produce the accompanying Einsteinian gravitation (G). This places the neutrinos’ information teleportation bandwidth natively higher by convention on the QE spectrum than the leptons but lower than the debytons. This structure makes the neutrino the intermediate link between leptonic (normal) matter and debytonic (dark) matter. As neutrinos transition through space, its mass oscillates by the neutrino pyrines’ interaction with free debytonic (dark) matter particles as both travel through space. The lower PH bandwidth of baryonic and leptonic pyrine within protons and neutrons and electrons accumulates more information as mass due to their pyrine’s lower ground-state PH dilation. The ground-state PH dilation is the native PH bandwidth, with zero debyton particle sequestration within the central PH regime around which particulate pyrine form. Each debyton particle sequestered within the pyrines’ circulating information channel increases the QE bandwidth and gravitation of the pyrine and the particle it projects into the subatomic realm. Baryonic pyrine’s diminutive native drain of information into the metaverse accumulates more information within its pyrine, ergo; greater mass. This increased mass is able to sequester a normal quantity of free debytons to produce a normal Newtonian/Einsteinian gravitational potential (G). This increased baryonic information outflow called gravitation comes via the increased PH dilation of each additional sequestered debyton particles QE channel with metamatter. However, when there is insufficient mass accumulation around a ground-state particulate PH regime, a particle cannot accommodate the sequestration of a normal Einsteinian quantity of debytons within its pyrine structure. Consequently, free debytons that would normally become trapped within pyrine for a time or for an entire universal transition cycle, instead buffet and attenuate the ground-state PH bandwidth of vulnerable particulate PH regimes such as the neutrinos’ as both travel through space. Each debyton-neutrino interaction causes a proportional attenuation of the neutrinos’ PH bandwidth. This interaction oscillates the neutrinos ability to maintain a constant information accumulation as mass. This buffeting is observable as oscillations in the neutrinos already miniscule energy and mass. A mass that may otherwise capture free debytons. Metaphorically, as a falling sky divers’ partially opened parachute is buffeted by the wind, the neutrinos’ information states known as flavors occur as its diminutive mass is buffeted by its interaction with free debytonic (dark) matter particles. While the neutrino interacts only minimally with the baryons and the leptons, the neutrino interacts more readily with the debytons as both bear a closer kinship via their more similar placement on the QE spectrum. While being buffeted on its relentless transitions through space, the neutrino’s attenuated information is teleported into the metaverse via the incident free debyton particles own hyper-dilated PH regimes. These are the same free debytonic PH regimes that when sequestered in normal matter would produce normal Einsteinian gravitation (G). This is also the same mechanism the LINE hypothesis proposes erodes dark holes in the early universe. The attenuation of the neutrinos information content is quantized hence each debyton-neutrino interaction attenuates a proportional quantity of neutrino energy and mass to produce the observed neutrino oscillations as neutrinos travel through space. This suggests that neutrino oscillation may increase or decrease in the presence of local elevated or diminished debyton population in space. A gravityscape of free debytons too diminutive to produce measurable local gravitational influences will nonetheless manifest within neutrinos a quantized but circumstantially arbitrary spectrum of neutrino energy oscillations as neutrinos travel through regions of space having gradients in debytonic population. This infers that neutrinos don’t only oscillate between a few flavors, but define a quantized region on the universal QE spectrum. By the universal information budget, as described by general relativity, a neutrinos extremely low mass defines a velocity very near to the maximum universal rendering rate, the speed of light. This near luminal velocity provides the neutrino with a perpetual supply of new information which perpetually replenishes the neutrinos loss of information due to its interaction with free debytonic particles. However, in the absence of free debytonic particles, neutrinos would not shed mass to oscillate, but instead would grow in mass into a more massive particle. A new neutrino perhaps, able to sequester a proportional quantity of debytonic (dark) matter particles and its accompanying gravitation. This new flavor of the venerable neutrino is called the dark neutrino and can only exist naturally within the debytonic deserts known as; voids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.