Jump to content
Science Forums

I Can Slow Down Time!


Recommended Posts

WOW! I have just discovered that I can slow down time and the experiment I performed shows I am correct. 

 

I started the experiment by looking for a way to measure time.  I decided that I would count numbers to equal the amount of time passed. 

 

I firstly counted to ten, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 

 

I then ran the experimental measurement several times

 

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

 

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

 

1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

 

I then discovered that if I counted quicker, time was to speed up. 

 

I then discovered that if I counted slower , time was to slow down. 

 

 

Where do I report my discovery? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOOOL

 

If we had a Funny claims forum I would say there, lacking it strange claims is fine :D

LOl, I thought I would try some   Reverse Psychology leads to scientific enlightenment.   It becomes more serious if I apply the above and use the Caesium standard. Science is saying the exact same thing as above with time dilation. Not so funny or silly anymore  hey? 

Edited by antoine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, this one is *totally* Silly.

 

 

In a rocket ship I soar, I explore the ocean floor, but you know, I'll never go unless you come along, :phones:

Buffyzo

IT is not silly at all .  Read my second post and decide for yourself what you and science is doing incorrectly. 

Edited by antoine
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, let me remove the reverse psychology

 

WOW! I have just discovered that I can slow down time and the experiment I performed shows I am correct. 

 

I started the experiment by looking for a way to measure time.  I decided that I would count numbers to equal the amount of time passed. 

 

I firstly counted to 9,192,631,770 

 

I then ran the experimental measurement several times

 

9,192,631,770 

 

9,192,631,770 

 

9,192,631,770 

 

I then discovered that if I counted quicker, time was to speed up. 

 

I then discovered that if I counted slower , time was to slow down. 

 

p.s an identical silly claim to the first post.

 

added diagram - 

 

post-94325-0-21896300-1502985367_thumb.jpg

 

 

 

 

Edited by antoine
Link to post
Share on other sites

LOl, I thought I would try some   Reverse Psychology leads to scientific enlightenment.   It becomes more serious if I apply the above and use the Caesium standard. Science is saying the exact same thing as above with time dilation. Not so funny or silly anymore  hey? 

How far can this gag run?  Surely you know that you don't even need a cesium clock to count time more consistently than a human counting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How far can this gag run?  Surely you know that you don't even need a cesium clock to count time more consistently than a human counting.

Of course I know that, you will tell me from my first post that I can't change the speed of time by counting fast or slow.  I think you miss the point .  Science says by counting fast or slow that time slows down or speeds up.  Think about this and you will realise it is far from a gag. I can count therefore I am. 

 

added- 

 

''I am'' an atomic clock detector

 

I firstly count 9,192,631,770  while at relative rest

 

 

I then count 9,192,631,000 while in relative motion

 

I am counting at different speeds . 

Edited by antoine
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

No it doesn't say that, because:

 

 

Excellent disproof of your assertion! Congratulations! :cheer:

 

 

The hurrier I go, the behinder I get, :phones:

Buffy

Excellent disproof of ''your'' assertion of Albert Einsteins thoughts on time dilation.   I intentionally put that in that disproves my assertion the same it disproves Einstein,  my notion is the exact same notion as time dilation. 

 

All observers anywhere in the Universe in any inertia reference frame experience 1.855e+43 tP's/second because c is constant.  My clock is very accurate.

 

In time dilation theory and the Lorentz length contraction, this is not accounted for, the shorter slower time being exactly that, a short measurement that has not travelled 1.855e+43 tP's/second . 

 

 

If we set the speed of time by using Δt=72e99a53d5ab93bc6364f60f1d3ec1f0.gif=c  we have synchronous time always and all observers count at the same speed and values always. 

 

So if instead of using the Caesium clock to measure time, if two observers were to use Planck light clocks, both observers at relative rest or in relative motion measure time to be synchronous.  The atomic clocks aboard your aeroplanes being shown to be malfunctioning and a variate measuring device,  by both the Planck light clocks constant tick frequency remaining synchronous.  

Edited by antoine
Link to post
Share on other sites

You win , being ignorant and ignoring me will make me see sense in that this forum is pointless for me .  I request a ban and will not return as a sock.  I have also requested all other science forums ban me that I am on, I have wasted my life trying to correct science with no gratitude or even proper listeners. 

 

Thank you for at least not being a-holes and allowing me to post on here, but will no discussion I am wasting my time . 

 

I wish you good day and good luck in the future, 

 

Regards 

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still not banned, huh!

 

Ok, as you have not banned me I can only continue.  I understand my notions are ''scary'' notions to the scientific community.   It is not my fault that my notions are very axiom notions, I did not create these notions they are a part of the universe, I just observed this and tried to explain this. 

I do not even like the idea of my own notions, I do not want to mess anything up.  BUT these notions are truthful so how am I suppose to ignore this? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...